Message ID | cover.1679259085.git.william.gray@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | regmap-irq: Drop map from handle_mask_sync() parameters | expand |
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 05:02:00PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > Changes in v2: > - Pull out 104-dio-48e refactor to a precursor patch > > Remove the map parameter from the struct regmap_irq_chip callback > handle_mask_sync() because it can be passed via the irq_drv_data > parameter instead. The gpio-104-dio-48e driver is the only consumer of > this callback and is thus updated accordingly. > > A couple pending patchsets also utilize handle_mask_sync() [0][1], so > it'll be useful to merge the changes in this series first to avoid > subsequent noise adjusting the dependent drivers. > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1677515341.git.william.gray@linaro.org/ > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1678106722.git.william.gray@linaro.org/ Good idea and intention, but something went wrong with bisectability as pointed out by the build bot. As a last resort you would need to squash these two, but try first another possible patch series split.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 05:18:53PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 02:44:43PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 05:02:00PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > > > Changes in v2: > > > - Pull out 104-dio-48e refactor to a precursor patch > > > > > > Remove the map parameter from the struct regmap_irq_chip callback > > > handle_mask_sync() because it can be passed via the irq_drv_data > > > parameter instead. The gpio-104-dio-48e driver is the only consumer of > > > this callback and is thus updated accordingly. > > > > > > A couple pending patchsets also utilize handle_mask_sync() [0][1], so > > > it'll be useful to merge the changes in this series first to avoid > > > subsequent noise adjusting the dependent drivers. > > > > > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1677515341.git.william.gray@linaro.org/ > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1678106722.git.william.gray@linaro.org/ > > > > Good idea and intention, but something went wrong with bisectability as pointed > > out by the build bot. As a last resort you would need to squash these two, but > > try first another possible patch series split. > I should have build tested each commit when I rebased rather than just > the last. Right, that's what we call a "compile time bisectability". > I'd rather avoid a squash so that these changes are distinct > for the sake of a clear git history on the regmap API change; That's my point! I glad we are on the same page. > I'll submit a v3 soon with the minor changes needed.