mbox series

[v1,0/7] pinctrl: npcm8xx: pin configuration changes

Message ID 20240711193749.2397471-1-tmaimon77@gmail.com
Headers show
Series pinctrl: npcm8xx: pin configuration changes | expand

Message

Tomer Maimon July 11, 2024, 7:37 p.m. UTC
This patch set addresses various pin configuration changes for the 
Nuvoton NPCM8XX BMC SoC. The patches aim to enhance functionality, 
remove unused pins, and improve overall pin management. 

Tomer Maimon (7):
  pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: clear polarity before set both edge
  pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: add gpi35 and gpi36
  pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: add pin 250 to DDR pins group
  pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: remove unused smb4den pin, group, function
  pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: remove unused lpcclk pin, group, function
  pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: modify clkrun and serirq pin configuration
  pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: modify pins flags

 drivers/pinctrl/nuvoton/pinctrl-npcm8xx.c | 64 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Comments

J. Neuschäfer July 12, 2024, 5:45 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:37:46PM +0300, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Remove unused smb4den pin, group and function on the Nuvoton NPCM8XX BMC
> SoC.

Does "unused" mean that they are just unused in current board designs,
or does the hardware functionality actually not exist?

Best regards, J

>
> Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/nuvoton/pinctrl-npcm8xx.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/nuvoton/pinctrl-npcm8xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/nuvoton/pinctrl-npcm8xx.c
> index f342aec3f6ca..396bd07e7c74 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/nuvoton/pinctrl-npcm8xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/nuvoton/pinctrl-npcm8xx.c
> @@ -438,7 +438,6 @@ static const int smb4_pins[]  = { 28, 29 };
>  static const int smb4b_pins[] = { 18, 19 };
>  static const int smb4c_pins[] = { 20, 21 };
>  static const int smb4d_pins[] = { 22, 23 };
> -static const int smb4den_pins[] = { 17 };
>  static const int smb5_pins[]  = { 26, 27 };
>  static const int smb5b_pins[] = { 13, 12 };
>  static const int smb5c_pins[] = { 15, 14 };
> @@ -700,7 +699,6 @@ struct npcm8xx_pingroup {
>  	NPCM8XX_GRP(smb4b), \
>  	NPCM8XX_GRP(smb4c), \
>  	NPCM8XX_GRP(smb4d), \
> -	NPCM8XX_GRP(smb4den), \
>  	NPCM8XX_GRP(smb5), \
>  	NPCM8XX_GRP(smb5b), \
>  	NPCM8XX_GRP(smb5c), \
> @@ -949,7 +947,6 @@ NPCM8XX_SFUNC(smb4);
>  NPCM8XX_SFUNC(smb4b);
>  NPCM8XX_SFUNC(smb4c);
>  NPCM8XX_SFUNC(smb4d);
> -NPCM8XX_SFUNC(smb4den);
>  NPCM8XX_SFUNC(smb5);
>  NPCM8XX_SFUNC(smb5b);
>  NPCM8XX_SFUNC(smb5c);
> @@ -1173,7 +1170,6 @@ static struct npcm8xx_func npcm8xx_funcs[] = {
>  	NPCM8XX_MKFUNC(smb4b),
>  	NPCM8XX_MKFUNC(smb4c),
>  	NPCM8XX_MKFUNC(smb4d),
> -	NPCM8XX_MKFUNC(smb4den),
>  	NPCM8XX_MKFUNC(smb5),
>  	NPCM8XX_MKFUNC(smb5b),
>  	NPCM8XX_MKFUNC(smb5c),
> @@ -1348,7 +1344,7 @@ static const struct npcm8xx_pincfg pincfg[] = {
>  	NPCM8XX_PINCFG(14,	gspi, MFSEL1, 24,	smb5c, I2CSEGSEL, 20,	none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		SLEW),
>  	NPCM8XX_PINCFG(15,	gspi, MFSEL1, 24,	smb5c, I2CSEGSEL, 20,	none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		SLEW),
>  	NPCM8XX_PINCFG(16,	lkgpo0, FLOCKR1, 0,	smb7b, I2CSEGSEL, 27,	tp_gpio2b, MFSEL7, 10,	none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		SLEW),
> -	NPCM8XX_PINCFG(17,	pspi, MFSEL3, 13,	cp1gpio5, MFSEL6, 7,	smb4den, I2CSEGSEL, 23,	none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		SLEW),
> +	NPCM8XX_PINCFG(17,	pspi, MFSEL3, 13,	cp1gpio5, MFSEL6, 7,	none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		SLEW),
>  	NPCM8XX_PINCFG(18,	pspi, MFSEL3, 13,	smb4b, I2CSEGSEL, 14,	none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		SLEW),
>  	NPCM8XX_PINCFG(19,	pspi, MFSEL3, 13,	smb4b, I2CSEGSEL, 14,	none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		SLEW),
>  	NPCM8XX_PINCFG(20,	hgpio0,	MFSEL2, 24,	smb15, MFSEL3, 8,	smb4c, I2CSEGSEL, 15,	none, NONE, 0,		none, NONE, 0,		SLEW),
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Jonas Gorski July 13, 2024, 12:35 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 at 02:48, Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This patch set addresses various pin configuration changes for the
> Nuvoton NPCM8XX BMC SoC. The patches aim to enhance functionality,
> remove unused pins, and improve overall pin management.
>
> Tomer Maimon (7):
>   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: clear polarity before set both edge
>   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: add gpi35 and gpi36
>   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: add pin 250 to DDR pins group
>   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: remove unused smb4den pin, group, function
>   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: remove unused lpcclk pin, group, function
>   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: modify clkrun and serirq pin configuration
>   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: modify pins flags

You also need to update
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.yaml
for any changes that affect the device tree bindings (e.g.
adding/removing functions/groups).

Best Regards,
Jonas
Tomer Maimon July 16, 2024, 2:24 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Jonas,

Thanks for your comment, will be addressed in next version.

Thanks,

Tomer

On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 at 15:35, Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 at 02:48, Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch set addresses various pin configuration changes for the
> > Nuvoton NPCM8XX BMC SoC. The patches aim to enhance functionality,
> > remove unused pins, and improve overall pin management.
> >
> > Tomer Maimon (7):
> >   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: clear polarity before set both edge
> >   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: add gpi35 and gpi36
> >   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: add pin 250 to DDR pins group
> >   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: remove unused smb4den pin, group, function
> >   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: remove unused lpcclk pin, group, function
> >   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: modify clkrun and serirq pin configuration
> >   pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm8xx: modify pins flags
>
> You also need to update
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.yaml
> for any changes that affect the device tree bindings (e.g.
> adding/removing functions/groups).
>
> Best Regards,
> Jonas
J. Neuschäfer July 18, 2024, 8:58 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:11PM +0300, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It does not exist, do you suggest modifying the "unused" to "not exist"?

Yes, that would be clearer in my opinion.

Best regards,
Jonathan
Tomer Maimon July 18, 2024, 10:05 p.m. UTC | #5
Done in V2 :-)

On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 at 23:58, J. Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:11PM +0300, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It does not exist, do you suggest modifying the "unused" to "not exist"?
>
> Yes, that would be clearer in my opinion.
>
> Best regards,
> Jonathan