| Message ID | 20231013145935.220945-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: allow slew rate bit in main pin config register | expand |
On 23/10/2023 10:19, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 4:59 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > >> Changes in v2 > > I tried to apply this to the pinctrl devel branch: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel > > It doesn't apply, could you rebase it? The context depends on my previous fix which you applied and sent for v6.6 already: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CACRpkdaybnYEmkgv7VG4fh5sXQ7uwHm2wH2Khja-P1b6idYr8w@mail.gmail.com/ I can rebase, but I am afraid it will cause conflicts. Is it reasonable for you to merge v6.6-rc7 into your devel branch? Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi, Changes in v2 ============= 1. Reversed xmas tree v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230901090224.27770-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/ Description =========== Prepare LPASS (Low Power Audio SubSystem) pin controller for newer Qualcomm SoCs. The patchset does not bring the newer SoCs yet, but only re-organizes the code for future changes. I understand that patch #2 (adding flag) makes little sense without actual user of that flag, but such user I cannot post yet. Dependency ========== Context depends on my previous fix: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230815110625.317971-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/ Best regards, Krzysztof Krzysztof Kozlowski (2): pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: split slew rate set to separate function pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: allow slew rate bit in main pin config register drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 69 +++++++++++++++--------- drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h | 7 +++ 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)