From patchwork Tue Feb 2 19:43:08 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= X-Patchwork-Id: 374822 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2AEC433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C21C64E60 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238380AbhBBTpV (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:45:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39166 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235277AbhBBTo7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:44:59 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [IPv6:2001:67c:670:201:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B082BC061573 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:44:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l71a4-0002fO-D0; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 20:43:20 +0100 Received: from ukl by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l71Zv-0004SH-BD; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 20:43:11 +0100 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:43:08 +0100 From: Uwe =?utf-8?q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: Russell King , Mathieu Poirier , Suzuki K Poulose , Alexander Shishkin , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Viresh Kumar , Tushar Khandelwal , Jassi Brar Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Linus Walleij , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jaroslav Kysela , Eric Anholt , Uwe =?utf-8?q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Alexandre Torgue , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , Takashi Iwai , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alexandre Belloni , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson , Guenter Roeck , Mike Leach , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Alessandro Zummo , coresight@lists.linaro.org, Vladimir Zapolskiy , Eric Auger , Alex Williamson , Mark Brown , Matt Mackall , Daniel Vetter , Dan Williams , Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Maxime Coquelin , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Leo Yan , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] mailbox: arm_mhuv2: make remove callback return void Message-ID: <20210202194308.jm66vblqjwr5wo6v@pengutronix.de> References: <20210126165835.687514-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20210202135350.36nj3dmcoq3t7gcf@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210202135350.36nj3dmcoq3t7gcf@pengutronix.de> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org My build tests failed to catch that amba driver that would have needed adaption in commit 3fd269e74f2f ("amba: Make the remove callback return void"). Change the remove function to make the driver build again. Reported-by: kernel test robot Fixes: 3fd269e74f2f ("amba: Make the remove callback return void") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- Hello, I guess I missed that driver during rebase as it was only introduced in the last merge window. Sorry for that. I'm unsure what is the right thing to do now. Should I redo the pull request (with this patch squashed into 3fd269e74f2f)? Or do we just apply this patch on top? FTR, the test robot report is at https://lore.kernel.org/r/202102030343.D9j1wukx-lkp@intel.com Best regards Uwe drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c index 67fb10885bb4..6cf1991a5c9c 100644 --- a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c +++ b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c @@ -1095,14 +1095,12 @@ static int mhuv2_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) return ret; } -static int mhuv2_remove(struct amba_device *adev) +static void mhuv2_remove(struct amba_device *adev) { struct mhuv2 *mhu = amba_get_drvdata(adev); if (mhu->frame == SENDER_FRAME) writel_relaxed(0x0, &mhu->send->access_request); - - return 0; } static struct amba_id mhuv2_ids[] = {