| Message ID | 20240116064505.487-2-quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,1/2] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Remove pattern match of ETE node name | expand |
On 1/16/2024 5:33 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 16/01/2024 06:45, Mao Jinlong wrote: >> Remove pattern match of ETE node name. Use ete with the number as the >> name for ete nodes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com> >> --- >> .../bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml | 6 ++---- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml >> index f725e6940993..ed78cc7ae94a 100644 >> --- >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml >> +++ >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml >> @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ description: | >> with any optional connection graph as per the coresight bindings. >> properties: >> - $nodename: >> - pattern: "^ete([0-9a-f]+)$" >> compatible: >> items: >> - const: arm,embedded-trace-extension >> @@ -55,13 +53,13 @@ examples: >> # An ETE node without legacy CoreSight connections >> - | >> - ete0 { >> + ete-0 { > > Why do we need the number ? why not simply "ete" as Krzysztof suggested ? > Hi Suzuki & Krzysztof , If name all the ete nodes' name as 'ete', there will be error below when build images. arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:301.6-312.4: ERROR (duplicate_node_names): /ete: Duplicate node name arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:314.6-325.4: ERROR (duplicate_node_names): /ete: Duplicate node name arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:327.6-338.4: ERROR (duplicate_node_names): /ete: Duplicate node name arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:340.6-351.4: ERROR (duplicate_node_names): /ete: Duplicate node name arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:353.6-364.4: ERROR (duplicate_node_names): /ete: Duplicate node name arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:366.6-377.4: ERROR (duplicate_node_names): /ete: Duplicate node name arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:379.6-390.4: ERROR (duplicate_node_names): /ete: Duplicate node name Thanks Jinlong Mao > >
On 17/01/2024 03:14, Jinlong Mao wrote: >>> - const: arm,embedded-trace-extension >>> @@ -55,13 +53,13 @@ examples: >>> # An ETE node without legacy CoreSight connections >>> - | >>> - ete0 { >>> + ete-0 { >> >> Why do we need the number ? why not simply "ete" as Krzysztof suggested ? >> > > Hi Suzuki & Krzysztof , > > If name all the ete nodes' name as 'ete', there will be error below when > build images. > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:301.6-312.4: ERROR Why are you pasting DTSI for binding? How is it related? Do we talk about DTSI here? No, this is a binding patch. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 1/17/2024 3:40 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 17/01/2024 03:14, Jinlong Mao wrote: >>>> - const: arm,embedded-trace-extension >>>> @@ -55,13 +53,13 @@ examples: >>>> # An ETE node without legacy CoreSight connections >>>> - | >>>> - ete0 { >>>> + ete-0 { >>> >>> Why do we need the number ? why not simply "ete" as Krzysztof suggested ? >>> >> >> Hi Suzuki & Krzysztof , >> >> If name all the ete nodes' name as 'ete', there will be error below when >> build images. >> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:301.6-312.4: ERROR > > Why are you pasting DTSI for binding? How is it related? Do we talk > about DTSI here? No, this is a binding patch. > Hi Krzysztof, Do you mean the name in DTSI can be different from the name in binding ? Thanks Jinlong Mao >
On 17/01/2024 08:49, Jinlong Mao wrote: > > > On 1/17/2024 3:40 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 17/01/2024 03:14, Jinlong Mao wrote: >>>>> - const: arm,embedded-trace-extension >>>>> @@ -55,13 +53,13 @@ examples: >>>>> # An ETE node without legacy CoreSight connections >>>>> - | >>>>> - ete0 { >>>>> + ete-0 { >>>> >>>> Why do we need the number ? why not simply "ete" as Krzysztof suggested ? >>>> >>> >>> Hi Suzuki & Krzysztof , >>> >>> If name all the ete nodes' name as 'ete', there will be error below when >>> build images. >>> >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:301.6-312.4: ERROR >> >> Why are you pasting DTSI for binding? How is it related? Do we talk >> about DTSI here? No, this is a binding patch. >> > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Do you mean the name in DTSI can be different from the name in binding ? Yes, we do not talk about DTSI here, so I did not suggest anything about DTSI. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml index f725e6940993..ed78cc7ae94a 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ description: | with any optional connection graph as per the coresight bindings. properties: - $nodename: - pattern: "^ete([0-9a-f]+)$" compatible: items: - const: arm,embedded-trace-extension @@ -55,13 +53,13 @@ examples: # An ETE node without legacy CoreSight connections - | - ete0 { + ete-0 { compatible = "arm,embedded-trace-extension"; cpu = <&cpu_0>; }; # An ETE node with legacy CoreSight connections - | - ete1 { + ete-1 { compatible = "arm,embedded-trace-extension"; cpu = <&cpu_1>;
Remove pattern match of ETE node name. Use ete with the number as the name for ete nodes. Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com> --- .../bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)