From patchwork Sat Sep 10 19:56:54 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Serge Semin X-Patchwork-Id: 604613 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A92C6FA83 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 19:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229815AbiIJT6B (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2022 15:58:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41020 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229789AbiIJT5Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2022 15:57:25 -0400 Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.com (mail.baikalelectronics.com [87.245.175.230]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C19047BB0; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 12:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail (mail.baikal.int [192.168.51.25]) by mail.baikalelectronics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A00DBD; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 23:00:58 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.baikalelectronics.com 96A00DBD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baikalelectronics.ru; s=mail; t=1662840058; bh=evl0QMbGUuK/VXmVFTFt7CDJBznWz4C4rkPe+VRXbvI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Uweo5280VyjXFAZ3PggU/9ogmf6kTDN4pgivwpaQO/gOUoUsS2UT4Qa8nyTRxQSRe VwXVhhb0SiBhpT/Wj3yYFD68W4Ttt/Rw5yn4mEn0dz7zLEpfUNGYCnjrlbrexxpcp3 TWu6bZkuql3lYwvYOqafARTeFJTn1ebO6dMY8mdM= Received: from localhost (192.168.168.10) by mail (192.168.51.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 22:57:07 +0300 From: Serge Semin To: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Michal Simek , Borislav Petkov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tony Luck , James Morse , Robert Richter CC: Serge Semin , Serge Semin , Alexey Malahov , Michail Ivanov , Pavel Parkhomenko , Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri , Manish Narani , Dinh Nguyen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 10/15] EDAC/synopsys: Add individual named ECC IRQs support Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 22:56:54 +0300 Message-ID: <20220910195659.11843-11-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> In-Reply-To: <20220910195659.11843-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> References: <20220910195659.11843-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: MAIL.baikal.int (192.168.51.25) To mail (192.168.51.25) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Currently the DW uMCTL2 DDRC EDAC driver supports a common unnamed IRQ only. It isn't suitable for our platform which has the individual IRQ lines for each DDRC event (ECC UE, ECC CE, DFI parity error, Scrubber done, etc). Moreover the DW uMCTL2 DDRC IP-core doesn't have an option to be configured with a common interrupts output line. So in order to have the generic DW uMCTL2 DDR controller and our platform supported by the driver we need to add the individual, per DDRC event, IRQs request support. There is not much to do really since the common IRQs handler has already been split up into the sub-handlers. So the only thing we need to do is first try to request the individual IRQs, if failed then fallback to the common IRQ. The IRQ names are used in accordance with the DW uMCTL2 DDRC DT-bindings. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin --- drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c index e5359ff2ed25..6a47e53deab5 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c @@ -1524,25 +1524,96 @@ static void snps_mc_free(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) edac_mc_free(mci); } -static int snps_setup_irq(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) +/** + * snps_request_ind_irq - Request individual DDRC IRQs. + * @mci: EDAC memory controller instance. + * + * Return: 0 if the IRQs were successfully requested, 1 if the individual IRQs + * are unavailable, otherwise negative errno. + */ +static int snps_request_ind_irq(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) { struct snps_edac_priv *priv = mci->pvt_info; - int ret, irq; + struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev; + int rc, irq; - irq = platform_get_irq(priv->pdev, 0); - if (irq < 0) { - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_MC, - "No IRQ %d in DT\n", irq); + irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(priv->pdev, "ecc_ce"); + if (irq == -ENXIO) + return 1; + if (irq < 0) + return irq; + + rc = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, snps_ce_irq_handler, 0, "ecc_ce", mci); + if (rc) { + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_MC, "Failed to request ECC CE IRQ\n"); + return rc; + } + + irq = platform_get_irq_byname(priv->pdev, "ecc_ue"); + if (irq < 0) return irq; + + rc = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, snps_ue_irq_handler, 0, "ecc_ue", mci); + if (rc) { + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_MC, "Failed to request ECC UE IRQ\n"); + return rc; + } + + return 0; +} + +/** + * snps_request_com_irq - Request common DDRC IRQ. + * @mci: EDAC memory controller instance. + * + * It first attempts to get the named IRQ. If failed the method fallbacks + * to first available one. + * + * Return: 0 if the IRQ was successfully requested otherwise negative errno. + */ +static int snps_request_com_irq(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) +{ + struct snps_edac_priv *priv = mci->pvt_info; + struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev; + int rc, irq; + + irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(priv->pdev, "ecc"); + if (irq < 0) { + irq = platform_get_irq(priv->pdev, 0); + if (irq < 0) + return irq; } - ret = devm_request_irq(&priv->pdev->dev, irq, snps_com_irq_handler, - 0, dev_name(&priv->pdev->dev), mci); - if (ret < 0) { + rc = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, snps_com_irq_handler, 0, "ecc", mci); + if (rc) { edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_MC, "Failed to request IRQ\n"); - return ret; + return rc; } + return 0; +} + +/** + * snps_setup_irq - Request and enable DDRC IRQs. + * @mci: EDAC memory controller instance. + * + * It first tries to get and request individual IRQs. If failed the method + * fallbacks to the common IRQ line case. The IRQs will be enabled only if + * some of these requests have been successful. + * + * Return: 0 if IRQs were successfully setup otherwise negative errno. + */ +static int snps_setup_irq(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) +{ + struct snps_edac_priv *priv = mci->pvt_info; + int rc; + + rc = snps_request_ind_irq(mci); + if (rc > 0) + rc = snps_request_com_irq(mci); + if (rc) + return rc; + snps_enable_irq(priv); return 0;