From patchwork Thu Nov 30 17:16:22 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Johan Hovold X-Patchwork-Id: 748668 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 637E95645D; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 17:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BtrU19xY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15C69C433CA; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 17:16:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1701364613; bh=UUFQFRvb1jh1J5SJLOCbZilXMNLl0hLuc7JaAaDPPtc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=BtrU19xYVX3pBdckOdxDyK8GaLlTk1wYxcTqfXvUhjW9VzRBZtRS2tfNAdgYFsMLC PYCwKyLTIdnc8Op8EmKrvFr9qvgoHJE/V2rO0eM84kpIA33vagLfzAoetHuPL6SPV1 SYYL43iE5P3R/ssgzzN8B1TRWMU4qjanMS+xh2RYVIXDeQrrvGkYkKqAlZuCG4AX8k uWjPbG3bAoVk3k7CAnOckVheVck8psHKCn8x1r56iNI5uJce7EFMY9Ni+StnXeJFOv MO7OvFK2ydYj0kawDp6WbEDesPEe4TmTbmdOE8RljXlX4uZt+518W2o4K/rv+1/z0O pHMtqQSgU208w== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r8kfF-0003Ce-1w; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:17:26 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hovold Subject: [PATCH 0/6] dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi: fix up examples Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:16:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20231130171628.12257-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup. This series addresses the iio/adc ones. Johan Johan Hovold (6): dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: fix reg description dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: fix example node name dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-iadc: clean up example dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-rradc: clean up example dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: fix example node names dt-bindings: iio/adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: clean up examples .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-iadc.yaml | 10 ++++++---- .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-rradc.yaml | 4 ++-- .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml | 9 +++++---- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)