Message ID | 20221214220727.1350784-1-jcormier@criticallink.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | hwmon: ltc2945: Add binding and shunt resistor support | expand |
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 07:04:55PM -0500, Cormier, Jonathan wrote: > Signed-off-by: "Cormier, Jonathan" <jcormier@criticallink.com> There should still be some description here. > --- > drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c b/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c > index 9adebb59f604..9af3e3821152 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c > @@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ > #define CONTROL_MULT_SELECT (1 << 0) > #define CONTROL_TEST_MODE (1 << 4) > > +static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused ltc2945_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "adi,ltc2945" }, > + { } > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ltc2945_of_match); > + > static inline bool is_power_reg(u8 reg) > { > return reg < LTC2945_SENSE_H; > @@ -475,8 +481,9 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ltc2945_id); > > static struct i2c_driver ltc2945_driver = { > .driver = { > - .name = "ltc2945", > - }, > + .name = "ltc2945", > + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ltc2945_of_match), > + }, > .probe_new = ltc2945_probe, > .id_table = ltc2945_id, > }; > -- > 2.25.1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 07:04:57PM -0500, Cormier, Jonathan wrote: > From: John Pruitt <jpruitt@criticallink.com> > > Use 64-bit values for intermediate calculations. Check for > overflows and return INT_MAX if overflows happened. > > Signed-off-by: John Pruitt <jpruitt@criticallink.com> > Signed-off-by: "Cormier, Jonathan" <jcormier@criticallink.com> The problems here are introduced with the previous patch and thus would need a Fixes: tag. It just doesn't make sense to submit that as separate patch. > --- > drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c | 20 +++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c b/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c > index fc7d399b2c85..7239422fc6db 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c > @@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ static long long ltc2945_reg_to_val(struct device *dev, u8 reg) > } > val *= 1000; > val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(val, shunt_resistor); > + /* check for overflow, use MAX value if it happened */ > + if (val > INT_MAX) > + val = INT_MAX; > + ltc2945_reg_to_val returns long long, and the calling code expects long long. How would this ever overflow ? > break; > case LTC2945_VIN_H: > case LTC2945_MAX_VIN_H: > @@ -159,12 +163,14 @@ static long long ltc2945_reg_to_val(struct device *dev, u8 reg) > } > > static int ltc2945_val_to_reg(struct device *dev, u8 reg, > - unsigned long val) > + unsigned long val_32) > { > struct ltc2945_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > struct regmap *regmap = data->regmap; > u32 shunt_resistor = data->shunt_resistor; > unsigned int control; > + /* use 64-bit val for intermediate calculations */ > + unsigned long long val = val_32; This is unnnecessary. The parameter can be unsigned long long, making the conversion automatic. > int ret; > > switch (reg) { > @@ -184,7 +190,7 @@ static int ltc2945_val_to_reg(struct device *dev, u8 reg, > if (control & CONTROL_MULT_SELECT) { > /* 25 mV * 25 uV = 0.625 uV resolution. */ > val *= shunt_resistor; > - val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val, 625 * 1000); > + val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(val, 625LL * 1000LL); > } else { > /* > * 0.5 mV * 25 uV = 0.0125 uV resolution. > @@ -192,7 +198,7 @@ static int ltc2945_val_to_reg(struct device *dev, u8 reg, > * accept loss of accuracy. > */ > val *= shunt_resistor; > - val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val, 25 * 1000) * 2; > + val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(val, 25LL * 1000LL) * 2; > } > break; > case LTC2945_VIN_H: > @@ -201,7 +207,7 @@ static int ltc2945_val_to_reg(struct device *dev, u8 reg, > case LTC2945_MAX_VIN_THRES_H: > case LTC2945_MIN_VIN_THRES_H: > /* 25 mV resolution. */ > - val /= 25; > + val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(val, 25LL); Unrelated change causing behavioral change. Not that I mind, but it is still unrelated and would have to be a separate patch. > break; > case LTC2945_ADIN_H: > case LTC2945_MAX_ADIN_H: > @@ -218,11 +224,15 @@ static int ltc2945_val_to_reg(struct device *dev, u8 reg, > case LTC2945_MIN_SENSE_THRES_H: > /* 25 uV resolution. Convert to mA. */ > val *= shunt_resistor; > - val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val, 25 * 1000); > + val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(val, 25LL * 1000LL); > break; > default: > return -EINVAL; > } > + /* If val is too large, just return the max value */ > + if (val > INT_MAX) > + return INT_MAX; > + While the return value is declared as int, the calling code expects unsigned long. It would be better to adjust the return value and clamp against ULONG_MAX. > return val; > } > > -- > 2.25.1