Message ID | 20210709173202.667820-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | clk: qcom: use power-domain for sm8250's clock controllers | expand |
On Fri 09 Jul 12:31 CDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > In order to properly handle runtime PM status of the provider device, > call pm_runtime_get/pm_runtime_put on the clock controller device. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c > index ccd36617d067..6bec31fccb09 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/ktime.h> > #include <linux/pm_domain.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > #include <linux/regmap.h> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > #include <linux/reset-controller.h> > @@ -50,6 +51,30 @@ enum gdsc_status { > GDSC_ON > }; > > +static int gdsc_pm_runtime_get(struct gdsc *sc) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + if (!sc->rpm_dev) > + return 0; > + > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(sc->rpm_dev); > + if (ret < 0) { > + pm_runtime_put_noidle(sc->rpm_dev); > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int gdsc_pm_runtime_put(struct gdsc *sc) > +{ > + if (!sc->rpm_dev) > + return 0; > + > + return pm_runtime_put_sync(sc->rpm_dev); > +} > + > /* Returns 1 if GDSC status is status, 0 if not, and < 0 on error */ > static int gdsc_check_status(struct gdsc *sc, enum gdsc_status status) > { > @@ -232,9 +257,8 @@ static void gdsc_retain_ff_on(struct gdsc *sc) > regmap_update_bits(sc->regmap, sc->gdscr, mask, mask); > } > > -static int gdsc_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > +static int _gdsc_enable(struct gdsc *sc) > { > - struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); > int ret; > > if (sc->pwrsts == PWRSTS_ON) > @@ -290,11 +314,28 @@ static int gdsc_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > return 0; > } > > -static int gdsc_disable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > +static int gdsc_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > { > struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); > int ret; > > + ret = gdsc_pm_runtime_get(sc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = _gdsc_enable(sc); > + if (ret) { > + gdsc_pm_runtime_put(sc); I presume what you do here is to leave the pm_runtime state of dispcc active if we succeeded in enabling the gdsc. But the gdsc is a subdomain of the parent domain, so the framework should take case of its dependency. So the reason for gdsc_pm_runtime_get()/put() in this code path is so that you can access the dispcc registers, i.e. I think you should get()/put() regardless of the return value. > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int _gdsc_disable(struct gdsc *sc) > +{ > + int ret; > + > if (sc->pwrsts == PWRSTS_ON) > return gdsc_assert_reset(sc); > > @@ -329,6 +370,18 @@ static int gdsc_disable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > return 0; > } > > +static int gdsc_disable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > +{ > + struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); > + int ret; > + If the gdsc is found to be on at initialization, the next operation that will happen is gdsc_disable() and as you didn't activate the pm_runtime state in gdsc_init() you would in theory get here with registers unaccessible. In practice though, the active gdsc should through the being a subdomain of the parent domain keep power on for you, so you won't notice this issue. But as above, I think you should wrap _gdsc_disable() in a get()/put() pair. > + ret = _gdsc_disable(sc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + return gdsc_pm_runtime_put(sc); > +} > + > static int gdsc_init(struct gdsc *sc) > { > u32 mask, val; > @@ -425,6 +478,8 @@ int gdsc_register(struct gdsc_desc *desc, > for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { > if (!scs[i]) > continue; > + if (pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) > + scs[i]->rpm_dev = dev; > scs[i]->regmap = regmap; > scs[i]->rcdev = rcdev; > ret = gdsc_init(scs[i]); > @@ -486,7 +541,10 @@ void gdsc_unregister(struct gdsc_desc *desc) > */ > int gdsc_gx_do_nothing_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > { > + struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); > + > /* Do nothing but give genpd the impression that we were successful */ > - return 0; > + /* Get the runtime PM device only */ > + return gdsc_pm_runtime_get(sc); Per above, if you let the framework deal with the gdsc's dependencies on the parent domain and you only get()/put() for the sake of dispcc then you don't need you don't need to do this to keep the subsequent gdsc_disable() in balance. > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gdsc_gx_do_nothing_enable); > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h > index 5bb396b344d1..a82982df0a55 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct reset_controller_dev; > * @resets: ids of resets associated with this gdsc > * @reset_count: number of @resets > * @rcdev: reset controller > + * @rpm_dev: runtime PM device > */ > struct gdsc { > struct generic_pm_domain pd; > @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ struct gdsc { > > const char *supply; > struct regulator *rsupply; > + struct device *rpm_dev; This isn't just the "runtime pm device", it's the device this gdsc is associated with. So "dev" sounds sufficient to me, but that requires that you have a separate bool rpm_enabled to remember if pm_runtime_enabled() was true during probe. So unless we need "dev" for something else this might be sufficient. Regards, Bjorn > }; > > struct gdsc_desc { > -- > 2.30.2 >
On Fri 09 Jul 12:32 CDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > Switch dispcc and videocc into using MMCX domain directly. Drop the now > unused mmcx regulator. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Regards, Bjorn > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 11 ++--------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi > index 4c0de12aaba6..2a468b85dc09 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi > @@ -271,13 +271,6 @@ memory@80000000 { > reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x0>; > }; > > - mmcx_reg: mmcx-reg { > - compatible = "regulator-fixed-domain"; > - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8250_MMCX>; > - required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>; > - regulator-name = "MMCX"; > - }; > - > pmu { > compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3"; > interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; > @@ -2362,7 +2355,7 @@ videocc: clock-controller@abf0000 { > clocks = <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_AHB_CLK>, > <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, > <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK_A>; > - mmcx-supply = <&mmcx_reg>; > + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8250_MMCX>; > clock-names = "iface", "bi_tcxo", "bi_tcxo_ao"; > #clock-cells = <1>; > #reset-cells = <1>; > @@ -2627,7 +2620,7 @@ opp-358000000 { > dispcc: clock-controller@af00000 { > compatible = "qcom,sm8250-dispcc"; > reg = <0 0x0af00000 0 0x10000>; > - mmcx-supply = <&mmcx_reg>; > + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8250_MMCX>; > clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>, > <&dsi0_phy 0>, > <&dsi0_phy 1>, > -- > 2.30.2 >
On Fri 09 Jul 12:32 CDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > Now as the common qcom clock controller code has been taught about power > domains, stop mentioning mmcx supply as a way to power up the clock > controller's gdsc. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Regards, Bjorn > --- > drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c > index de09cd5c209f..dfbfe64b12f6 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c > @@ -955,7 +955,6 @@ static struct gdsc mdss_gdsc = { > }, > .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON, > .flags = HW_CTRL, > - .supply = "mmcx", > }; > > static struct clk_regmap *disp_cc_sm8250_clocks[] = { > -- > 2.30.2 >
On 09/07/2021 21:54, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Fri 09 Jul 12:31 CDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> In order to properly handle runtime PM status of the provider device, >> call pm_runtime_get/pm_runtime_put on the clock controller device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> >> --- >> drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c >> index ccd36617d067..6bec31fccb09 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ >> #include <linux/kernel.h> >> #include <linux/ktime.h> >> #include <linux/pm_domain.h> >> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> >> #include <linux/regmap.h> >> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> >> #include <linux/reset-controller.h> >> @@ -50,6 +51,30 @@ enum gdsc_status { >> GDSC_ON >> }; >> >> +static int gdsc_pm_runtime_get(struct gdsc *sc) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (!sc->rpm_dev) >> + return 0; >> + >> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(sc->rpm_dev); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(sc->rpm_dev); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int gdsc_pm_runtime_put(struct gdsc *sc) >> +{ >> + if (!sc->rpm_dev) >> + return 0; >> + >> + return pm_runtime_put_sync(sc->rpm_dev); >> +} >> + >> /* Returns 1 if GDSC status is status, 0 if not, and < 0 on error */ >> static int gdsc_check_status(struct gdsc *sc, enum gdsc_status status) >> { >> @@ -232,9 +257,8 @@ static void gdsc_retain_ff_on(struct gdsc *sc) >> regmap_update_bits(sc->regmap, sc->gdscr, mask, mask); >> } >> >> -static int gdsc_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) >> +static int _gdsc_enable(struct gdsc *sc) >> { >> - struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); >> int ret; >> >> if (sc->pwrsts == PWRSTS_ON) >> @@ -290,11 +314,28 @@ static int gdsc_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -static int gdsc_disable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) >> +static int gdsc_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) >> { >> struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); >> int ret; >> >> + ret = gdsc_pm_runtime_get(sc); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = _gdsc_enable(sc); >> + if (ret) { >> + gdsc_pm_runtime_put(sc); > > I presume what you do here is to leave the pm_runtime state of dispcc > active if we succeeded in enabling the gdsc. But the gdsc is a subdomain > of the parent domain, so the framework should take case of its > dependency. > > So the reason for gdsc_pm_runtime_get()/put() in this code path is so > that you can access the dispcc registers, i.e. I think you should > get()/put() regardless of the return value. pm domain code will handle enabling MMCX, so this code is not required strictly speaking. Ulf suggested adding it back, so I followed the suggestion. Maybe I misunderstood his suggestion. putting pm_runtime after gdsc_enable does not sound like a logical case. However it would simplify code a bit. Let me try... > >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int _gdsc_disable(struct gdsc *sc) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + >> if (sc->pwrsts == PWRSTS_ON) >> return gdsc_assert_reset(sc); >> >> @@ -329,6 +370,18 @@ static int gdsc_disable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static int gdsc_disable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) >> +{ >> + struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); >> + int ret; >> + > > If the gdsc is found to be on at initialization, the next operation that > will happen is gdsc_disable() and as you didn't activate the pm_runtime > state in gdsc_init() you would in theory get here with registers > unaccessible. > > In practice though, the active gdsc should through the being a subdomain > of the parent domain keep power on for you, so you won't notice this > issue. Nice catch. > > But as above, I think you should wrap _gdsc_disable() in a get()/put() > pair. > >> + ret = _gdsc_disable(sc); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + return gdsc_pm_runtime_put(sc); >> +} >> + >> static int gdsc_init(struct gdsc *sc) >> { >> u32 mask, val; >> @@ -425,6 +478,8 @@ int gdsc_register(struct gdsc_desc *desc, >> for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { >> if (!scs[i]) >> continue; >> + if (pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) >> + scs[i]->rpm_dev = dev; >> scs[i]->regmap = regmap; >> scs[i]->rcdev = rcdev; >> ret = gdsc_init(scs[i]); >> @@ -486,7 +541,10 @@ void gdsc_unregister(struct gdsc_desc *desc) >> */ >> int gdsc_gx_do_nothing_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) >> { >> + struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); >> + >> /* Do nothing but give genpd the impression that we were successful */ >> - return 0; >> + /* Get the runtime PM device only */ >> + return gdsc_pm_runtime_get(sc); > > Per above, if you let the framework deal with the gdsc's dependencies on > the parent domain and you only get()/put() for the sake of dispcc then > you don't need you don't need to do this to keep the subsequent > gdsc_disable() in balance. > >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gdsc_gx_do_nothing_enable); >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h >> index 5bb396b344d1..a82982df0a55 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h >> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h >> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct reset_controller_dev; >> * @resets: ids of resets associated with this gdsc >> * @reset_count: number of @resets >> * @rcdev: reset controller >> + * @rpm_dev: runtime PM device >> */ >> struct gdsc { >> struct generic_pm_domain pd; >> @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ struct gdsc { >> >> const char *supply; >> struct regulator *rsupply; >> + struct device *rpm_dev; > > This isn't just the "runtime pm device", it's the device this gdsc is > associated with. So "dev" sounds sufficient to me, but that requires > that you have a separate bool rpm_enabled to remember if > pm_runtime_enabled() was true during probe. > > So unless we need "dev" for something else this might be sufficient. > > Regards, > Bjorn > >> }; >> >> struct gdsc_desc { >> -- >> 2.30.2 >>
On Fri 09 Jul 17:10 CDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 09/07/2021 21:54, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Fri 09 Jul 12:31 CDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > > > In order to properly handle runtime PM status of the provider device, > > > call pm_runtime_get/pm_runtime_put on the clock controller device. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > > drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h | 2 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c > > > index ccd36617d067..6bec31fccb09 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c > > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > > #include <linux/ktime.h> > > > #include <linux/pm_domain.h> > > > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > > #include <linux/regmap.h> > > > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > > > #include <linux/reset-controller.h> > > > @@ -50,6 +51,30 @@ enum gdsc_status { > > > GDSC_ON > > > }; > > > +static int gdsc_pm_runtime_get(struct gdsc *sc) > > > +{ > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > + if (!sc->rpm_dev) > > > + return 0; > > > + > > > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(sc->rpm_dev); > > > + if (ret < 0) { > > > + pm_runtime_put_noidle(sc->rpm_dev); > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > +static int gdsc_pm_runtime_put(struct gdsc *sc) > > > +{ > > > + if (!sc->rpm_dev) > > > + return 0; > > > + > > > + return pm_runtime_put_sync(sc->rpm_dev); > > > +} > > > + > > > /* Returns 1 if GDSC status is status, 0 if not, and < 0 on error */ > > > static int gdsc_check_status(struct gdsc *sc, enum gdsc_status status) > > > { > > > @@ -232,9 +257,8 @@ static void gdsc_retain_ff_on(struct gdsc *sc) > > > regmap_update_bits(sc->regmap, sc->gdscr, mask, mask); > > > } > > > -static int gdsc_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > > > +static int _gdsc_enable(struct gdsc *sc) > > > { > > > - struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); > > > int ret; > > > if (sc->pwrsts == PWRSTS_ON) > > > @@ -290,11 +314,28 @@ static int gdsc_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > > > return 0; > > > } > > > -static int gdsc_disable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > > > +static int gdsc_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > > > { > > > struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); > > > int ret; > > > + ret = gdsc_pm_runtime_get(sc); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + > > > + ret = _gdsc_enable(sc); > > > + if (ret) { > > > + gdsc_pm_runtime_put(sc); > > > > I presume what you do here is to leave the pm_runtime state of dispcc > > active if we succeeded in enabling the gdsc. But the gdsc is a subdomain > > of the parent domain, so the framework should take case of its > > dependency. > > > > So the reason for gdsc_pm_runtime_get()/put() in this code path is so > > that you can access the dispcc registers, i.e. I think you should > > get()/put() regardless of the return value. > > pm domain code will handle enabling MMCX, so this code is not required > strictly speaking. Ulf suggested adding it back, so I followed the > suggestion. Maybe I misunderstood his suggestion. > > putting pm_runtime after gdsc_enable does not sound like a logical case. > However it would simplify code a bit. Let me try... > If you consider this device's and the individual gdsc's power state as separate consumers of MMCX, then it perhaps makes more sense? Similar to how a regulator driver would rely on the regulator framework to deal with parent regulators... Regards, Bjorn > > > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > +static int _gdsc_disable(struct gdsc *sc) > > > +{ > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > if (sc->pwrsts == PWRSTS_ON) > > > return gdsc_assert_reset(sc); > > > @@ -329,6 +370,18 @@ static int gdsc_disable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > > > return 0; > > > } > > > +static int gdsc_disable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > > > +{ > > > + struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > > If the gdsc is found to be on at initialization, the next operation that > > will happen is gdsc_disable() and as you didn't activate the pm_runtime > > state in gdsc_init() you would in theory get here with registers > > unaccessible. > > > > In practice though, the active gdsc should through the being a subdomain > > of the parent domain keep power on for you, so you won't notice this > > issue. > > Nice catch. > > > > > But as above, I think you should wrap _gdsc_disable() in a get()/put() > > pair. > > > > > + ret = _gdsc_disable(sc); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + > > > + return gdsc_pm_runtime_put(sc); > > > +} > > > + > > > static int gdsc_init(struct gdsc *sc) > > > { > > > u32 mask, val; > > > @@ -425,6 +478,8 @@ int gdsc_register(struct gdsc_desc *desc, > > > for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { > > > if (!scs[i]) > > > continue; > > > + if (pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) > > > + scs[i]->rpm_dev = dev; > > > scs[i]->regmap = regmap; > > > scs[i]->rcdev = rcdev; > > > ret = gdsc_init(scs[i]); > > > @@ -486,7 +541,10 @@ void gdsc_unregister(struct gdsc_desc *desc) > > > */ > > > int gdsc_gx_do_nothing_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain) > > > { > > > + struct gdsc *sc = domain_to_gdsc(domain); > > > + > > > /* Do nothing but give genpd the impression that we were successful */ > > > - return 0; > > > + /* Get the runtime PM device only */ > > > + return gdsc_pm_runtime_get(sc); > > > > Per above, if you let the framework deal with the gdsc's dependencies on > > the parent domain and you only get()/put() for the sake of dispcc then > > you don't need you don't need to do this to keep the subsequent > > gdsc_disable() in balance. > > > > > } > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gdsc_gx_do_nothing_enable); > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h > > > index 5bb396b344d1..a82982df0a55 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h > > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct reset_controller_dev; > > > * @resets: ids of resets associated with this gdsc > > > * @reset_count: number of @resets > > > * @rcdev: reset controller > > > + * @rpm_dev: runtime PM device > > > */ > > > struct gdsc { > > > struct generic_pm_domain pd; > > > @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ struct gdsc { > > > const char *supply; > > > struct regulator *rsupply; > > > + struct device *rpm_dev; > > > > This isn't just the "runtime pm device", it's the device this gdsc is > > associated with. So "dev" sounds sufficient to me, but that requires > > that you have a separate bool rpm_enabled to remember if > > pm_runtime_enabled() was true during probe. > > > > So unless we need "dev" for something else this might be sufficient. > > > > Regards, > > Bjorn > > > > > }; > > > struct gdsc_desc { > > > -- > > > 2.30.2 > > > > > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry