| Message ID | 1495167957-14923-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | coresight: enable debug module | expand |
Hi Suzuki, Leo, On 19/05/17 05:25, Leo Yan wrote: > From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > > Add Coresight CPU debug nodes for Juno r0, r1 & r2. The CPU > debug areas are mapped at the same address for all revisions, > like the ETM, even though the CPUs have changed from r1 to r2. > > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.porier@linaro.org> > Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> ARM-SoC team expect DTS to be routed via platform tree. So I have queued this for v4.13[1] -- Regards, Sudeep [1] https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/linux/h/for-next/juno-updates -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 19/05/17 18:44, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi Suzuki, Leo, > > On 19/05/17 05:25, Leo Yan wrote: >> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> >> >> Add Coresight CPU debug nodes for Juno r0, r1 & r2. The CPU >> debug areas are mapped at the same address for all revisions, >> like the ETM, even though the CPUs have changed from r1 to r2. >> >> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> >> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> >> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.porier@linaro.org> >> Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > > ARM-SoC team expect DTS to be routed via platform tree. > So I have queued this for v4.13[1] Sudeep Thanks for picking that up. Suzuki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:25:49PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > Add detailed documentation for Coresight CPU debug driver, which > contains the info for driver implementation, Mike Leach excellent > summary for "clock and power domain". At the end some examples on how > to enable the debugging functionality are provided. Hi Leo, Below are my minor suggestions to improve readability of the documentation. Thanks, Liviu > > Suggested-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/trace/coresight-cpu-debug.txt | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 174 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/coresight-cpu-debug.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/trace/coresight-cpu-debug.txt b/Documentation/trace/coresight-cpu-debug.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..f0c3f0f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/trace/coresight-cpu-debug.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ > + Coresight CPU Debug Module > + ========================== > + > + Author: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > + Date: April 5th, 2017 > + > +Introduction > +------------ > + > +Coresight CPU debug module is defined in ARMv8-a architecture reference manual > +(ARM DDI 0487A.k) Chapter 'Part H: External debug', the CPU can integrate > +debug module and it is mainly used for two modes: self-hosted debug and > +external debug. Usually the external debug mode is well known as the external > +debugger connects with SoC from JTAG port; on the other hand the program can > +explore debugging method which rely on self-hosted debug mode, this document > +is to focus on this part. > + > +The debug module provides sample-based profiling extension, which can be used > +to sample CPU program counter, secure state and exception level, etc; usually > +every CPU has one dedicated debug module to be connected. Based on self-hosted > +debug mechanism, Linux kernel can access these related registers from mmio > +region when the kernel panic happens. The callback notifier for kernel panic > +will dump related registers for every CPU; finally this is good for assistant > +analysis for panic. > + > + > +Implementation > +-------------- > + > +- During driver registration, use EDDEVID and EDDEVID1 two device ID During driver registration, it uses EDDEVID and EDDEVID1 - two device ID > + registers to decide if sample-based profiling is implemented or not. On some > + platforms this hardware feature is fully or partialy implemented; and if > + this feature is not supported then registration will fail. > + > +- When write this doc, the debug driver mainly relies on three sampling > + registers. The kernel panic callback notifier gathers info from EDPCSR > + EDVIDSR and EDCIDSR; from EDPCSR we can get program counter, EDVIDSR has At the time this documentation was writen, the debug driver mainly relies on information gathered by the kernel panic callback notifier from three sampling registers: EDPCSR, EDVIDSR and EDCIDSR: .... > + information for secure state, exception level, bit width, etc; EDCIDSR is > + context ID value which contains the sampled value of CONTEXTIDR_EL1. > + > +- The driver supports CPU running mode with either AArch64 or AArch32. The ... supports a CPU running in either AArch64 or AArch32 mode. The > + registers naming convention is a bit different between them, AArch64 uses > + 'ED' for register prefix (ARM DDI 0487A.k, chapter H9.1) and AArch32 uses > + 'DBG' as prefix (ARM DDI 0487A.k, chapter G5.1). The driver is unified to > + use AArch64 naming convention. > + > +- ARMv8-a (ARM DDI 0487A.k) and ARMv7-a (ARM DDI 0406C.b) have different > + register bits definition. So the driver consolidates two difference: > + > + If PCSROffset=0b0000, on ARMv8-a the feature of EDPCSR is not implemented; > + but ARMv7-a defines "PCSR samples are offset by a value that depends on the > + instruction set state". For ARMv7-a, the driver checks furthermore if CPU > + runs with ARM or thumb instruction set and calibrate PCSR value, the > + detailed description for offset is in ARMv7-a ARM (ARM DDI 0406C.b) chapter > + C11.11.34 "DBGPCSR, Program Counter Sampling Register". > + > + If PCSROffset=0b0010, ARMv8-a defines "EDPCSR implemented, and samples have > + no offset applied and do not sample the instruction set state in AArch32 > + state". So on ARMv8 if EDDEVID1.PCSROffset is 0b0010 and the CPU operates > + in AArch32 state, EDPCSR is not sampled; when the CPU operates in AArch64 > + state EDPCSR is sampled and no offset are applied. > + > + > +Clock and power domain > +---------------------- > + > +Before accessing debug registers, we should ensure the clock and power domain > +have been enabled properly. In ARMv8-a ARM (ARM DDI 0487A.k) chapter 'H9.1 > +Debug registers', the debug registers are spread into two domains: the debug > +domain and the CPU domain. > + > + +---------------+ > + | | > + | | > + +----------+--+ | > + dbg_clk -->| |**| |<-- cpu_clk > + | Debug |**| CPU | > + dbg_pd -->| |**| |<-- cpu_pd > + +----------+--+ | > + | | > + | | > + +---------------+ > + > +For debug domain, the user uses DT binding "clocks" and "power-domains" to > +specify the corresponding clock source and power supply for the debug logic. > +The driver calls the pm_runtime_{put|get} operations as needed to handle the > +debug power domain. > + > +For CPU domain, the different SoC designs have different power management > +schemes and finally this heavily impacts external debug module. So we can > +divide into below cases: > + > +- On systems with a sane power controller which can behave correctly with > + respect to CPU power domain, the CPU power domain can be controlled by > + register EDPRCR in driver. The driver firstly writes bit EDPRCR.COREPURQ > + to power up the CPU, and then writes bit EDPRCR.CORENPDRQ for emulation > + of CPU power down. As result, this can ensure the CPU power domain is > + powered on properly during the period when access debug related registers; > + > +- Some designs will power down an entire cluster if all CPUs on the cluster > + are powered down - including the parts of the debug registers that should > + remain powered in the debug power domain. The bits in EDPRCR are not > + respected in these cases, so these designs do not support debug over > + power down in the way that the CoreSight / Debug designers anticipated. > + This means that even checking EDPRSR has the potential to cause a bus hang > + if the target register is unpowered. > + > + In this case, accessing to the debug registers while they are not powered > + is a recipe for disaster; so we need preventing CPU low power states at boot > + time or when user enable module at the run time. Please see chapter > + "How to use the module" for detailed usage info for this. > + > + > +Device Tree Bindings > +-------------------- > + > +See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight-cpu-debug.txt for details. > + > + > +How to use the module > +--------------------- > + > +If you want to enable debugging functionality at boot time, you can add > +"coresight_cpu_debug.enable=1" to the kernel command line parameter. > + > +The driver also can work as module, so can enable the debugging when insmod > +module: > +# insmod coresight_cpu_debug.ko debug=1 > + > +When boot time or insmod module you have not enabled the debugging, the driver > +uses the debugfs file system to provide a knob to dynamically enable or disable > +debugging: > + > +To enable it, write a '1' into /sys/kernel/debug/coresight_cpu_debug/enable: > +# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/coresight_cpu_debug/enable > + > +To disable it, write a '0' into /sys/kernel/debug/coresight_cpu_debug/enable: > +# echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/coresight_cpu_debug/enable > + > +As explained in chapter "Clock and power domain", if you are working on one > +platform which has idle states to power off debug logic and the power > +controller cannot work well for the request from EDPRCR, then you should > +firstly constraint CPU idle states before enable CPU debugging feature; so can > +ensure the accessing to debug logic. > + > +If you want to limit idle states at boot time, you can use "nohlt" or > +"cpuidle.off=1" in the kernel command line. > + > +At the runtime you can disable idle states with below methods: > + > +Set latency request to /dev/cpu_dma_latency to disable all CPUs specific idle > +states (if latency = 0uS then disable all idle states): > +# echo "what_ever_latency_you_need_in_uS" > /dev/cpu_dma_latency > + > +Disable specific CPU's specific idle state: > +# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$cpu/cpuidle/state$state/disable > + > + > +Output format > +------------- > + > +Here is an example of the debugging output format: > + > +ARM external debug module: > +coresight-cpu-debug 850000.debug: CPU[0]: > +coresight-cpu-debug 850000.debug: EDPRSR: 00000001 (Power:On DLK:Unlock) > +coresight-cpu-debug 850000.debug: EDPCSR: [<ffff00000808e9bc>] handle_IPI+0x174/0x1d8 > +coresight-cpu-debug 850000.debug: EDCIDSR: 00000000 > +coresight-cpu-debug 850000.debug: EDVIDSR: 90000000 (State:Non-secure Mode:EL1/0 Width:64bits VMID:0) > +coresight-cpu-debug 852000.debug: CPU[1]: > +coresight-cpu-debug 852000.debug: EDPRSR: 00000001 (Power:On DLK:Unlock) > +coresight-cpu-debug 852000.debug: EDPCSR: [<ffff0000087fab34>] debug_notifier_call+0x23c/0x358 > +coresight-cpu-debug 852000.debug: EDCIDSR: 00000000 > +coresight-cpu-debug 852000.debug: EDVIDSR: 90000000 (State:Non-secure Mode:EL1/0 Width:64bits VMID:0) > -- > 2.7.4 > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html