[v7,1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,tcsr: document ipq6018 compatible

Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.txt | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Hi Rob,

On Wed, Aug 25 2021, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:48:26 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
>> ---
>> v7:
>> 
>>   Use 'reg' instead of 'offset' (Rob)
>> 
>>   Drop 'clock-names' and 'assigned-clock*' (Bjorn)
>> 
>>   Use single cell address/size in example node (Bjorn)
>> 
>>   Move '#pwm-cells' lower in example node (Bjorn)
>> 
>>   List 'reg' as required
>> 
>> v6:
>> 
>>   Device node is child of TCSR; remove phandle (Rob Herring)
>> 
>>   Add assigned-clocks/assigned-clock-rates (Uwe Kleine-König)
>> 
>> v5: Use qcom,pwm-regs for phandle instead of direct regs (Bjorn
>>     Andersson, Kathiravan T)
>> 
>> v4: Update the binding example node as well (Rob Herring's bot)
>> 
>> v3: s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)
>> 
>> v2: Make #pwm-cells const (Rob Herring)
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml      | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
>
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
>
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.example.dt.yaml:0:0:
> /example-0/syscon@1937000: failed to match any schema with compatible:
> ['qcom,tcsr-ipq6018', 'syscon', 'simple-mfd']

What can I do about that? Is it because qcom,tcsr-ipq6018 is documented
in a non-yaml plain .txt file?

Thanks,
baruch

> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1520591
>
> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> series is generally the most recent rc1.
>
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
>
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>
> Please check and re-submit.

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:12 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 05:59:45PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 25 2021, Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:48:26 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > >> DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
> > >> ---
> > >> v7:
> > >>
> > >>   Use 'reg' instead of 'offset' (Rob)
> > >>
> > >>   Drop 'clock-names' and 'assigned-clock*' (Bjorn)
> > >>
> > >>   Use single cell address/size in example node (Bjorn)
> > >>
> > >>   Move '#pwm-cells' lower in example node (Bjorn)
> > >>
> > >>   List 'reg' as required
> > >>
> > >> v6:
> > >>
> > >>   Device node is child of TCSR; remove phandle (Rob Herring)
> > >>
> > >>   Add assigned-clocks/assigned-clock-rates (Uwe Kleine-König)
> > >>
> > >> v5: Use qcom,pwm-regs for phandle instead of direct regs (Bjorn
> > >>     Andersson, Kathiravan T)
> > >>
> > >> v4: Update the binding example node as well (Rob Herring's bot)
> > >>
> > >> v3: s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)
> > >>
> > >> v2: Make #pwm-cells const (Rob Herring)
> > >> ---
> > >>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml      | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> > >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
> > >
> > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> > >
> > > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > >
> > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.example.dt.yaml:0:0:
> > > /example-0/syscon@1937000: failed to match any schema with compatible:
> > > ['qcom,tcsr-ipq6018', 'syscon', 'simple-mfd']
> >
> > What can I do about that? Is it because qcom,tcsr-ipq6018 is documented
> > in a non-yaml plain .txt file?
>
> No, it is not documented at all.

Sorry, I should read patch 1 first... Still, before adding new
features to an MFD, the base MFD should be converted.

Rob