diff mbox series

[7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: remove invalid reg-names from ufs node

Message ID 20230323-topic-sm8450-upstream-dt-bindings-fixes-v1-7-3ead1e418fe4@linaro.org
State New
Headers show
Series arm64: qcom: sm8450: bindings check cleanup | expand

Commit Message

Neil Armstrong March 23, 2023, 10:25 a.m. UTC
Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)

Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Eric Biggers March 24, 2023, 6:52 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Neil,

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
> > > ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
> > >   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
> > >   				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> > >   			reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
> > >   			      <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
> > > -			reg-names = "std", "ice";
> > 
> > This is also part of:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
> > but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
> 
> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
> 

The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
be removed from the device tree.  A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names.  It looks like that
patch got missed, though:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com

- Eric
Krzysztof Kozlowski March 24, 2023, 7:14 a.m. UTC | #2
On 24/03/2023 07:52, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>> Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
>>>> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
>>>>   				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>>>>   			reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
>>>>   			      <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
>>>> -			reg-names = "std", "ice";
>>>
>>> This is also part of:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
>>> but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
>>
>> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
>> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
>>
> 
> The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
> be removed from the device tree.  A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
> device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names.  It looks like that
> patch got missed, though:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com

Exactly. This is why I never saw these warnings.

Neil, there are a lot of pending patches, so you need to be sure you run
dtbs_check with them applied.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Luca Weiss March 24, 2023, 7:26 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Eric,

On Fri Mar 24, 2023 at 7:52 AM CET, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > > Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
> > > > ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
> > > >   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > > index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > > @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
> > > >   				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> > > >   			reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
> > > >   			      <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
> > > > -			reg-names = "std", "ice";
> > > 
> > > This is also part of:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
> > > but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
> > 
> > I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
> > and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
> > 
>
> The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
> be removed from the device tree.  A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
> device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names.  It looks like that
> patch got missed, though:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com

Are you implying that I should resend the patch or something? Not sure
who to bug about applying this patch.

Regards
Luca

>
> - Eric
Krzysztof Kozlowski March 24, 2023, 7:27 a.m. UTC | #4
On 24/03/2023 08:26, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> On Fri Mar 24, 2023 at 7:52 AM CET, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
>>>>> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
>>>>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
>>>>>   				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>>>>>   			reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
>>>>>   			      <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
>>>>> -			reg-names = "std", "ice";
>>>>
>>>> This is also part of:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
>>>> but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
>>>
>>> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
>>> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
>>>
>>
>> The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
>> be removed from the device tree.  A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
>> device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names.  It looks like that
>> patch got missed, though:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com
> 
> Are you implying that I should resend the patch or something? Not sure
> who to bug about applying this patch.

Yes, you should. It has been almost three months...

Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
@@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@  ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
 				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
 			reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
 			      <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
-			reg-names = "std", "ice";
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>;
 			phy-names = "ufsphy";