Message ID | 20191010113937.15962-6-ulf.hansson@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 778f173eb4528a6b48ff6a8600515899de75333c |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> > > Currently CPU's idle states are represented using the flattened model. > Let's add support for the hierarchical layout, via converting to use > of_get_cpu_state_node(). > > Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Looks simpler now, thanks. Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> -- Regards, Sudeep
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c b/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c index d06d21a9525d..252f2a9686a6 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c @@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ static bool idle_state_valid(struct device_node *state_node, unsigned int idx, for (cpu = cpumask_next(cpumask_first(cpumask), cpumask); cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpumask)) { cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu); - curr_state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", - idx); + curr_state_node = of_get_cpu_state_node(cpu_node, idx); if (state_node != curr_state_node) valid = false; @@ -170,7 +169,7 @@ int dt_init_idle_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpumask_first(cpumask)); for (i = 0; ; i++) { - state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i); + state_node = of_get_cpu_state_node(cpu_node, i); if (!state_node) break;