mbox series

[v1,0/5] Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk for some QC targets

Message ID 20250325123019.597976-1-prashanth.k@oss.qualcomm.com
Headers show
Series Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk for some QC targets | expand

Message

Prashanth K March 25, 2025, 12:30 p.m. UTC
During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the
runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI}
register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0.
Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new
events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More
info about the crash at [1].

This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few
other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing
the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register
write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested
on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year
and hasn't exhibited any side effects.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/

Prashanth K (3):
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk

Pratham Pratap (2):
  arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
  arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi  | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi  | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi  | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi  | 1 +
 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

Comments

Prashanth K March 26, 2025, 6:08 a.m. UTC | #1
On 26-03-25 03:40 am, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 05:31:28PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 3/25/25 4:01 PM, Prashanth K wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote:
>>>>> During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the
>>>>> runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI}
>>>>> register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0.
>>>>> Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new
>>>>> events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More
>>>>> info about the crash at [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few
>>>>> other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing
>>>>> the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register
>>>>> write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
>>>>> to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested
>>>>> on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year
>>>>> and hasn't exhibited any side effects.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Prashanth K (3):
>>>>>   arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
>>>>>   arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
>>>>>   arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
>>>>>
>>>>> Pratham Pratap (2):
>>>>>   arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
>>>>>   arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk
>>>>
>>>> Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently
>>>> supported upstream?
>>>>
>>>> Konrad
>>>
>>> My initial plan was to add it for all the QC platforms, but wasn't
>>> confident enough about it. Because we have seen the issue only on these
>>> targets and hence tested only on these.
>>
>> Okay, let's proceed with these and in the meantime please query internally
>> whether it could be applicable to others too
>>
> 
> But if it applies to all qcom targets, wouldn't it make more sense to
> add the property in the qcom glue driver?

Hi Bjorn, This issue was seen only on some targets 2 years back, so we
only tested on those platforms. I think its better to add it to other QC
targets only if we see that issue.

> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> Konrad

Thanks for the review Konrad

Regards,
Prashanth K