Message ID | 20250325123019.597976-1-prashanth.k@oss.qualcomm.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk for some QC targets | expand |
On 26-03-25 03:40 am, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 05:31:28PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 3/25/25 4:01 PM, Prashanth K wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 25-03-25 08:11 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> On 3/25/25 1:30 PM, Prashanth K wrote: >>>>> During device mode initialization on certain QC targets, before the >>>>> runstop bit is set, sometimes it's observed that the GEVNTADR{LO/HI} >>>>> register write fails. As a result, GEVTADDR registers are still 0x0. >>>>> Upon setting runstop bit, DWC3 controller attempts to write the new >>>>> events to address 0x0, causing an SMMU fault and system crash. More >>>>> info about the crash at [1]. >>>>> >>>>> This was initially observed on SM8450 and later reported on few >>>>> other targets as well. As suggested by Qualcomm HW team, clearing >>>>> the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit resolves the issue by preventing register >>>>> write failures. Address this by setting the snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> to keep the GUSB3PIPECTL.SUSPHY bit cleared. This change was tested >>>>> on multiple targets (SM8350, SM8450 QCS615 etc.) for over an year >>>>> and hasn't exhibited any side effects. >>>>> >>>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fa94cbc9-e637-ba9b-8ec8-67c6955eca98@quicinc.com/ >>>>> >>>>> Prashanth K (3): >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> >>>>> Pratham Pratap (2): >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>>> arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk >>>> >>>> Are there more targets affected, from the list of the ones currently >>>> supported upstream? >>>> >>>> Konrad >>> >>> My initial plan was to add it for all the QC platforms, but wasn't >>> confident enough about it. Because we have seen the issue only on these >>> targets and hence tested only on these. >> >> Okay, let's proceed with these and in the meantime please query internally >> whether it could be applicable to others too >> > > But if it applies to all qcom targets, wouldn't it make more sense to > add the property in the qcom glue driver? Hi Bjorn, This issue was seen only on some targets 2 years back, so we only tested on those platforms. I think its better to add it to other QC targets only if we see that issue. > > Regards, > Bjorn > >> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> >> >> Konrad Thanks for the review Konrad Regards, Prashanth K