mbox series

[0/1] Pass down connector to drm bridge detect hook

Message ID 20250321085345.136380-1-andyshrk@163.com
Headers show
Series Pass down connector to drm bridge detect hook | expand

Message

Andy Yan March 21, 2025, 8:53 a.m. UTC
From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>


In some application scenarios, we hope to get the corresponding
connector when the bridge's detect hook is invoked.

For example, we may want to call drm_dp_read_sink_count_cap(which needs
a drm_connector) at the dp deteck hook, intel_dp and nouveau_dp do this
at it's connector's detetc_ctx/detect hook.

But for a bridge driver, it's detect hook is initiated by the connector,
there is no connector passed down.

In most cases, we can get the connector by drm_atomic_get_connector_for_encoder
if the encoder attached to the bridge is enabled, however there will
still be some scenarios where the detect hook of the bridge is called
but the corresponding encoder has not been enabled yet. For instance,
this occurs when the device is hot plug in for the first time.

Since the call to bridge's detect is initiated by the connector, passing
down the corresponding connector directly will make things simpler.

Before preparing this patch, we have had some discussions on the details
here[0].

[0]https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/640712/?series=143573&rev=5


Andy Yan (1):
  drm/bridge: Pass down connector to drm bridge detect hook

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c          |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c             |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c   |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/chrontel-ch7033.c              |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/display-connector.c            | 11 ++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6263.c                   |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c                   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it66121.c                  |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt8912b.c              |  6 +++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c               |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c            |  3 ++-
 .../gpu/drm/bridge/megachips-stdpxxxx-ge-b850v3-fw.c  |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sii902x.c                      |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/simple-bridge.c                |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi-qp.c          |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c             |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c                     |  5 +++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c                 |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c                    |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tpd12s015.c                 |  8 +++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_bridge_connector.c        |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c                          |  5 +++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c                     |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi.c                   |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c                       |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.h                       |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_bridge.c                |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_hpd.c                   |  4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c                      |  3 ++-
 include/drm/drm_bridge.h                              |  6 ++++--
 30 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

Comments

Maxime Ripard March 21, 2025, 9:48 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 04:53:38PM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
> From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
> 
> In some application scenarios, we hope to get the corresponding
> connector when the bridge's detect hook is invoked.
> 
> In most cases, we can get the connector by drm_atomic_get_connector_for_encoder
> if the encoder attached to the bridge is enabled, however there will
> still be some scenarios where the detect hook of the bridge is called
> but the corresponding encoder has not been enabled yet. For instance,
> this occurs when the device is hot plug in for the first time.
> 
> Since the call to bridge's detect is initiated by the connector, passing
> down the corresponding connector directly will make things simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>

FTR, I'm against it and would have appreciated that you wait for a
meaningful closure to the discussion we've had on this.

Maxime