Message ID | 20220710021032.27455-1-quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Coresight: Add support for TPDM and TPDA | expand |
Hi all, Please help to review V12 patches. Thanks Jinlong Mao On 7/10/2022 10:10 AM, Mao Jinlong wrote: > This series adds support for the trace performance monitoring and > diagnostics hardware (TPDM and TPDA). It is composed of two major > elements. > a) Changes for original coresight framework to support for TPDM and TPDA. > b) Add driver code for TPDM and TPDA. > > Introduction of changes for original coresight framework > Support TPDM as new coresight source. > Since only STM and ETM are supported as coresight source originally. > TPDM is a newly added coresight source. We need to change > the original way of saving coresight path to support more types source > for coresight driver. > The following patch is to add support more coresight sources. > coresight: core: Use IDR for non-cpu bound sources' paths. > > Introduction of TPDM and TPDA > TPDM - The trace performance monitoring and diagnostics monitor or TPDM in > short serves as data collection component for various dataset types > specified in the QPMDA(Qualcomm performance monitoring and diagnostics > architecture) spec. The primary use case of the TPDM is to collect data > from different data sources and send it to a TPDA for packetization, > timestamping and funneling. > Coresight: Add coresight TPDM source driver > dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDM hardware definitions > coresight-tpdm: Add DSB dataset support > coresight-tpdm: Add integration test support > docs: sysfs: coresight: Add sysfs ABI documentation for TPDM > > TPDA - The trace performance monitoring and diagnostics aggregator or > TPDA in short serves as an arbitration and packetization engine for the > performance monitoring and diagnostics network as specified in the QPMDA > (Qualcomm performance monitoring and diagnostics architecture) > specification. The primary use case of the TPDA is to provide > packetization, funneling and timestamping of Monitor data as specified > in the QPMDA specification. > The following patch is to add driver for TPDA. > Coresight: Add TPDA link driver > dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDA hardware definitions > > The last patch of this series is a device tree modification, which add > the TPDM and TPDA configuration to device tree for validating. > ARM: dts: msm: Add coresight components for SM8250 > ARM: dts: msm: Add tpdm mm/prng for sm8250 > > Once this series patches are applied properly, the tpdm and tpda nodes > should be observed at the coresight path /sys/bus/coresight/devices > e.g. > /sys/bus/coresight/devices # ls -l | grep tpd > tpda0 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/6004000.tpda/tpda0 > tpdm0 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/6c08000.mm.tpdm/tpdm0 > > We can use the commands are similar to the below to validate TPDMs. > Enable coresight sink first. > > echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tmc_etf0/enable_sink > echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/enable_source > echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/integration_test > echo 2 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/integration_test > The test data will be collected in the coresight sink which is enabled. > If rwp register of the sink is keeping updating when do > integration_test (by cat tmc_etf0/mgmt/rwp), it means there is data > generated from TPDM to sink. > > There must be a tpda between tpdm and the sink. When there are some > other trace event hw components in the same HW block with tpdm, tpdm > and these hw components will connect to the coresight funnel. When > there is only tpdm trace hw in the HW block, tpdm will connect to > tpda directly. > > +---------------+ +-------------+ > | tpdm@6c08000 | |tpdm@684C000 | > +-------|-------+ +------|------+ > | | > +-------|-------+ | > | funnel@6c0b000| | > +-------|-------+ | > | | > +-------|-------+ | > |funnel@6c2d000 | | > +-------|-------+ | > | | > | +---------------+ | > +----- tpda@6004000 -----------+ > +-------|-------+ > | > +-------|-------+ > |funnel@6005000 | > +---------------+ > > This patch series depends on patch series: > "[v2,00/13] coresight: Add new API to allocate trace source ID values" > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20220704081149.16797-1-mike.leach@linaro.org/ > > Changes from V11: > 1. Clear bits for atid before setting them and relese atid when tpda > remove. -- Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > > Mao Jinlong (9): > coresight: core: Use IDR for non-cpu bound sources' paths. > Coresight: Add coresight TPDM source driver > dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDM hardware definitions > coresight-tpdm: Add DSB dataset support > coresight-tpdm: Add integration test support > Coresight: Add TPDA link driver > dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDA hardware definitions > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add coresight components > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add tpdm mm/prng > > .../testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm | 13 + > .../bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-tpda.yaml | 111 +++ > .../bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-tpdm.yaml | 93 +++ > MAINTAINERS | 2 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 671 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig | 23 + > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile | 2 + > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 42 +- > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c | 208 ++++++ > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.h | 35 + > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 259 +++++++ > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h | 62 ++ > include/linux/coresight.h | 1 + > 13 files changed, 1510 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-tpda.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-tpdm.yaml > create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c > create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.h > create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c > create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h >
Hi Reviewers, Please help to review V12 series of TPDM/TPDA patches. Thanks Jinlong Mao On 7/21/2022 11:30 PM, Jinlong Mao wrote: > Hi all, > > Please help to review V12 patches. > > Thanks > > Jinlong Mao > > On 7/10/2022 10:10 AM, Mao Jinlong wrote: >> This series adds support for the trace performance monitoring and >> diagnostics hardware (TPDM and TPDA). It is composed of two major >> elements. >> a) Changes for original coresight framework to support for TPDM and >> TPDA. >> b) Add driver code for TPDM and TPDA. >> >> Introduction of changes for original coresight framework >> Support TPDM as new coresight source. >> Since only STM and ETM are supported as coresight source originally. >> TPDM is a newly added coresight source. We need to change >> the original way of saving coresight path to support more types source >> for coresight driver. >> The following patch is to add support more coresight sources. >> coresight: core: Use IDR for non-cpu bound sources' paths. >> >> Introduction of TPDM and TPDA >> TPDM - The trace performance monitoring and diagnostics monitor or >> TPDM in >> short serves as data collection component for various dataset types >> specified in the QPMDA(Qualcomm performance monitoring and diagnostics >> architecture) spec. The primary use case of the TPDM is to collect data >> from different data sources and send it to a TPDA for packetization, >> timestamping and funneling. >> Coresight: Add coresight TPDM source driver >> dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDM hardware definitions >> coresight-tpdm: Add DSB dataset support >> coresight-tpdm: Add integration test support >> docs: sysfs: coresight: Add sysfs ABI documentation for TPDM >> >> TPDA - The trace performance monitoring and diagnostics aggregator or >> TPDA in short serves as an arbitration and packetization engine for the >> performance monitoring and diagnostics network as specified in the QPMDA >> (Qualcomm performance monitoring and diagnostics architecture) >> specification. The primary use case of the TPDA is to provide >> packetization, funneling and timestamping of Monitor data as specified >> in the QPMDA specification. >> The following patch is to add driver for TPDA. >> Coresight: Add TPDA link driver >> dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDA hardware definitions >> >> The last patch of this series is a device tree modification, which add >> the TPDM and TPDA configuration to device tree for validating. >> ARM: dts: msm: Add coresight components for SM8250 >> ARM: dts: msm: Add tpdm mm/prng for sm8250 >> >> Once this series patches are applied properly, the tpdm and tpda nodes >> should be observed at the coresight path /sys/bus/coresight/devices >> e.g. >> /sys/bus/coresight/devices # ls -l | grep tpd >> tpda0 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/6004000.tpda/tpda0 >> tpdm0 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/6c08000.mm.tpdm/tpdm0 >> >> We can use the commands are similar to the below to validate TPDMs. >> Enable coresight sink first. >> >> echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tmc_etf0/enable_sink >> echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/enable_source >> echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/integration_test >> echo 2 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/integration_test >> The test data will be collected in the coresight sink which is enabled. >> If rwp register of the sink is keeping updating when do >> integration_test (by cat tmc_etf0/mgmt/rwp), it means there is data >> generated from TPDM to sink. >> >> There must be a tpda between tpdm and the sink. When there are some >> other trace event hw components in the same HW block with tpdm, tpdm >> and these hw components will connect to the coresight funnel. When >> there is only tpdm trace hw in the HW block, tpdm will connect to >> tpda directly. >> +---------------+ +-------------+ >> | tpdm@6c08000 | |tpdm@684C000 | >> +-------|-------+ +------|------+ >> | | >> +-------|-------+ | >> | funnel@6c0b000| | >> +-------|-------+ | >> | | >> +-------|-------+ | >> |funnel@6c2d000 | | >> +-------|-------+ | >> | | >> | +---------------+ | >> +----- tpda@6004000 -----------+ >> +-------|-------+ >> | >> +-------|-------+ >> |funnel@6005000 | >> +---------------+ >> >> This patch series depends on patch series: >> "[v2,00/13] coresight: Add new API to allocate trace source ID values" >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20220704081149.16797-1-mike.leach@linaro.org/ >> >> >> Changes from V11: >> 1. Clear bits for atid before setting them and relese atid when tpda >> remove. -- Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> >> >> Mao Jinlong (9): >> coresight: core: Use IDR for non-cpu bound sources' paths. >> Coresight: Add coresight TPDM source driver >> dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDM hardware definitions >> coresight-tpdm: Add DSB dataset support >> coresight-tpdm: Add integration test support >> Coresight: Add TPDA link driver >> dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDA hardware definitions >> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add coresight components >> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add tpdm mm/prng >> >> .../testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm | 13 + >> .../bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-tpda.yaml | 111 +++ >> .../bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-tpdm.yaml | 93 +++ >> MAINTAINERS | 2 + >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 671 ++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig | 23 + >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile | 2 + >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 42 +- >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c | 208 ++++++ >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.h | 35 + >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 259 +++++++ >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h | 62 ++ >> include/linux/coresight.h | 1 + >> 13 files changed, 1510 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 >> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm >> create mode 100644 >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-tpda.yaml >> create mode 100644 >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-tpdm.yaml >> create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.h >> create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h >>
On 8/2/2022 7:43 AM, Jinlong Mao wrote: > Hi Reviewers, > > Please help to review V12 series of TPDM/TPDA patches. > > Thanks > Suzuki and Mathieu, we are almost there it seems in getting the acceptance of these patches, so I hope you find the time to review these patches. I guess it is almost a year now for these patches and had a good amount of reviews and revisions :) ---Trilok Soni
Hi Trilok, On 02/08/2022 18:33, Trilok Soni wrote: > > > On 8/2/2022 7:43 AM, Jinlong Mao wrote: >> Hi Reviewers, >> >> Please help to review V12 series of TPDM/TPDA patches. >> >> Thanks >> > > Suzuki and Mathieu, we are almost there it seems in getting the > acceptance of these patches, so I hope you find the time to review these > patches. I guess it is almost a year now for these patches and had a > good amount of reviews and revisions :) This series has been reviewed for the previous versions (which is why we have it in v12) and this one depends on a series worked on by Mike Leach. We cannot push this without the dynamic Trace ID allocation scheme, which is clearly mentioned in the cover letter for this series. As such this series is in a good shape, assuming all the comments in the previous version has been addressed. So, we would rather get Mike's work priority and pull that in, so that we can eventually get this upstream. Kind regards Suzuki > > ---Trilok Soni
Hi Suzuki, On 8/2/2022 10:43 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > Hi Trilok, > > On 02/08/2022 18:33, Trilok Soni wrote: >> >> >> On 8/2/2022 7:43 AM, Jinlong Mao wrote: >>> Hi Reviewers, >>> >>> Please help to review V12 series of TPDM/TPDA patches. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >> >> Suzuki and Mathieu, we are almost there it seems in getting the >> acceptance of these patches, so I hope you find the time to review >> these patches. I guess it is almost a year now for these patches and >> had a good amount of reviews and revisions :) > > This series has been reviewed for the previous versions (which is why > we have it in v12) and this one depends on a series worked on by Mike > Leach. We cannot push this without the dynamic Trace ID allocation > scheme, which is clearly mentioned in the cover letter for this > series. > > As such this series is in a good shape, assuming all the comments > in the previous version has been addressed. So, we would rather > get Mike's work priority and pull that in, so that we can eventually > get this upstream. > > I believe we have addressed all the comments in v12. Are you ok, if we post additional features series (around ~2k to ~3k SLOC)? I just want to make sure we are not creating flood of patches w/ features. ---Trilok Soni
On 02/08/2022 19:09, Trilok Soni wrote: > Hi Suzuki, > > On 8/2/2022 10:43 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >> Hi Trilok, >> >> On 02/08/2022 18:33, Trilok Soni wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 8/2/2022 7:43 AM, Jinlong Mao wrote: >>>> Hi Reviewers, >>>> >>>> Please help to review V12 series of TPDM/TPDA patches. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>> >>> Suzuki and Mathieu, we are almost there it seems in getting the >>> acceptance of these patches, so I hope you find the time to review >>> these patches. I guess it is almost a year now for these patches and >>> had a good amount of reviews and revisions :) >> >> This series has been reviewed for the previous versions (which is why >> we have it in v12) and this one depends on a series worked on by Mike >> Leach. We cannot push this without the dynamic Trace ID allocation >> scheme, which is clearly mentioned in the cover letter for this >> series. >> >> As such this series is in a good shape, assuming all the comments >> in the previous version has been addressed. So, we would rather >> get Mike's work priority and pull that in, so that we can eventually >> get this upstream. >> >> > > I believe we have addressed all the comments in v12. Are you ok, if we > post additional features series (around ~2k to ~3k SLOC)? I just want to > make sure we are not creating flood of patches w/ features. You are free to post the patches, as long as you clearly mention the dependencies in the cover letter. Please be mindful about the merge window. Suzuki