From patchwork Tue Dec 22 22:31:15 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kevin Hilman X-Patchwork-Id: 58963 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.89.199 with SMTP id bq7csp3515027lbb; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:33:17 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.148.167 with SMTP id tt7mr39806130pab.62.1450823596955; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:33:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 192si3229946pfa.49.2015.12.22.14.33.16 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:33:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:1868:205::9; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aBVTD-0005kL-C8; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:31:51 +0000 Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aBVTA-0005g8-FC for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:31:49 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-f169.google.com with SMTP id o64so112526574pfb.3 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:31:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=7cPNkf3sxyC7pl+rRjjkn8uXRQyqGCBK838c9f/7XBM=; b=b6+BnFDfPcuCYN4qdOqynYUqNeh2wsHFy1MJHSd/X8291kvgfXIYr0JOM4deYbM+Cg thKf9oLmXwPMnpgzmp+5qXFHOJz9nFcovxC+2K/WMccq98lCUkML6Knt7hjX109ZU44l jHO9j92NdyAK251HUJ701ajGQoXVVKGrNaIOcGA4nNrlC2CueehA+LNhoyh1dZrY5nw3 QW9kDcoiB4D805TFV+HOMdWvTVtZgVnJ0ucsrHfurc/Ou1rRCAv9sDuvp7LqIem8nHUS yf9X6HCecpS1iXG2gH6V9YCWWII65ogcfnyBMs+9MEnM/DintQwNXwA8t9LEENF+4Gd9 c+4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnyi3HbuSYXRVYE0oGhu+8hErzHej0Sytmg30kr34HKdOr7QxzDAmfufywAek3xXrU2ME8jbfJZBDDamV3JgNrzkHibMA== X-Received: by 10.98.73.19 with SMTP id w19mr39596987pfa.103.1450823487159; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:31:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-76-104-183-97.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [76.104.183.97]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cp4sm48001503pad.41.2015.12.22.14.31.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:31:25 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Hilman To: Mason Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] Sigma Designs Tango4 port References: <566FDF53.3030004@sigmadesigns.com> <7hr3iexp3e.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <5679B15F.80106@free.fr> <7hoadi6wfw.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <5679C743.1070000@free.fr> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:31:15 -0800 In-Reply-To: <5679C743.1070000@free.fr> (Mason's message of "Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:57:23 +0100") Message-ID: <7h60zqund8.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20151222_143148_575868_211BF272 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.45 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.6 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.192.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.192.169 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Arnd Bergmann , arm-soc , Olof Johansson , Sebastian Frias , Linux ARM , Marc Gonzalez Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org Mason writes: > On 22/12/2015 21:49, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Mason wrote: >> >>> On 22/12/2015 20:25, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> >>>> Was it intentional to leave out a multi_v7_defconfig change so that this >>>> actually builds? Or was that planned for a future series? >>> >>> How is a multi_v7_defconfig different from any old defconfig? >> >> Not sure what you're asking. >> >> The point is that this series doesn't enable any defconfig to build it. > > What is not clear to me is: are you asking me to submit a new defconfig > (specific to my platform), or are you saying I need to add the new > platform to arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig multi_v7_defconfig, which is what I've been assuming you've been testing it with. Is that correct? > (I'm not sure how exactly > to go about doing that; also I'm concerned about merge conflicts, since > my patch set is based on v4.1) The latter. Something like below[1]. Just keep the multi_v7_defconfig patch as a separate patch, and we'll take care of the merge conflicts when applying to the relevant arm-soc branches. > >>>> IMO, it should be part of this series so it gets build tested as soon as >>>> it's merged. >>> >>> The problem is that a mandatory driver is missing upstream >>> (interrupt controller). >>> >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2089470 >> >> Which means it presumably wont boot without that, but it should still >> build without it, correct? (I tried it locally, and it does.) > > Can I submit the defconfig update as a follow-up patch? IMO, it should be part of this series that adds the platform. That way, as soon as it gets merged, it will be automatically build tested by various automated builders. (also note that it would be automatically boot tested if I had the hardware as well... hint, hint) ;) Kevin [1] _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig index 69a22fdb52a5..d5aa59b148da 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ CONFIG_ARCH_R8A7794=y CONFIG_ARCH_SH73A0=y CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI=y CONFIG_ARCH_SIRF=y +CONFIG_ARCH_TANGO=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC=y