From patchwork Thu Nov 3 20:23:06 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mark Rutland X-Patchwork-Id: 80727 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.97.247 with SMTP id m110csp826216qge; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:25:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.99.146.22 with SMTP id o22mr3141323pgd.40.1478204756782; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e4si11525481pgc.43.2016.11.03.13.25.56 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:1868:205::9; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1c2OZH-0001U3-Vg; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 20:24:59 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1c2OYM-0001EU-6M for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 20:24:03 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672F71595; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 86A0D3F318; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:23:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Rutland To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCHv2 04/11] arm64: traps: simplify die() and __die() Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:23:06 +0000 Message-Id: <1478204593-29145-5-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1478204593-29145-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> References: <1478204593-29145-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20161103_132402_394722_9D35C757 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.90 ) X-Spam-Score: -8.3 (--------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-8.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [217.140.101.70 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, keescook@chromium.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, james.morse@arm.com, luto@kernel.org, labbott@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org In arm64's die and __die routines we pass around a thread_info, and subsequently use this to determine the relevant task_struct, and the end of the thread's stack. Subsequent patches will decouple thread_info from the stack, and this approach will no longer work. To figure out the end of the stack, we can use the new generic end_of_stack() helper. As we only call __die() from die(), and die() always deals with the current task, we can remove the parameter and have both acquire current directly, which also makes it clear that __die can't be called for arbitrary tasks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Tested-by: Laura Abbott Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon --- arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c index 95a5452..7ac30bf 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c @@ -228,10 +228,9 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp) #endif #define S_SMP " SMP" -static int __die(const char *str, int err, struct thread_info *thread, - struct pt_regs *regs) +static int __die(const char *str, int err, struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct task_struct *tsk = thread->task; + struct task_struct *tsk = current; static int die_counter; int ret; @@ -246,7 +245,8 @@ static int __die(const char *str, int err, struct thread_info *thread, print_modules(); __show_regs(regs); pr_emerg("Process %.*s (pid: %d, stack limit = 0x%p)\n", - TASK_COMM_LEN, tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), thread + 1); + TASK_COMM_LEN, tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), + end_of_stack(tsk)); if (!user_mode(regs)) { dump_mem(KERN_EMERG, "Stack: ", regs->sp, @@ -265,7 +265,6 @@ static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(die_lock); */ void die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, int err) { - struct thread_info *thread = current_thread_info(); int ret; oops_enter(); @@ -273,9 +272,9 @@ void die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, int err) raw_spin_lock_irq(&die_lock); console_verbose(); bust_spinlocks(1); - ret = __die(str, err, thread, regs); + ret = __die(str, err, regs); - if (regs && kexec_should_crash(thread->task)) + if (regs && kexec_should_crash(current)) crash_kexec(regs); bust_spinlocks(0);