From patchwork Thu Aug 11 09:33:39 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhen Lei X-Patchwork-Id: 73717 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.29.52 with SMTP id a49csp15357qga; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 02:36:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.98.63.1 with SMTP id m1mr15506164pfa.14.1470908219517; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 02:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t90si2445068pfa.50.2016.08.11.02.36.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Aug 2016 02:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:1868:205::9; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bXmP2-0007QH-Fn; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:35:52 +0000 Received: from [119.145.14.66] (helo=szxga03-in.huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bXmOv-00064f-Cn for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:35:47 +0000 Received: from 172.24.1.60 (EHLO szxeml422-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.60]) by szxrg03-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.4.3-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CGE16264; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:34:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.177.23.164) by szxeml422-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:34:17 +0800 From: Zhen Lei To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , Rob Herring , "Frank Rowand" , devicetree Subject: [PATCH v6 05/14] arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:33:39 +0800 Message-ID: <1470908028-8596-6-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.5.msysgit.1 In-Reply-To: <1470908028-8596-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> References: <1470908028-8596-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.177.23.164] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.57AC46A6.00A4, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-05-26 15:14:31, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: a264423f0df063f9dd95aaa2d8a12ee9 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160811_023545_834487_C20A164F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.39 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-3.4 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [119.145.14.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [119.145.14.66 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Xinwei Hu , Zhen Lei , Zefan Li , Hanjun Guo , Tianhong Ding Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org numa_init(of_numa_init) may returned error because of numa configuration error. So "No NUMA configuration found" is inaccurate. In fact, specific configuration error information should be immediately printed by the testing branch. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei --- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.5.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c index c7fe3ec..fe26ed9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c @@ -333,8 +333,10 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void)) if (ret < 0) return ret; - if (nodes_empty(numa_nodes_parsed)) + if (nodes_empty(numa_nodes_parsed)) { + pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n"); return -EINVAL; + } ret = numa_register_nodes(); if (ret < 0) @@ -365,8 +367,6 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void) if (numa_off) pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */ - else - pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n"); pr_info("NUMA: Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", 0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);