From patchwork Mon Feb 22 09:37:54 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shannon Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 62538 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.43.199 with SMTP id y7csp1125030lbl; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:47:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.98.79.156 with SMTP id f28mr36872453pfj.55.1456134451636; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:47:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id zv5si30149503pac.220.2016.02.22.01.47.31 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:47:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:1868:205::9; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aXn4T-00014s-FF; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:46:25 +0000 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aXn0U-0004Mj-2T for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:42:22 +0000 Received: from 172.24.1.48 (EHLO szxeml434-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.48]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DEY64633; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:39:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from HGHY1Z002260041.china.huawei.com (10.177.16.142) by szxeml434-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.225) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:38:59 +0800 From: Shannon Zhao To: , , Subject: [PATCH v12 18/21] KVM: ARM64: Free perf event of PMU when destroying vcpu Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:37:54 +0800 Message-ID: <1456133877-9584-19-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.0.msysgit.0 In-Reply-To: <1456133877-9584-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> References: <1456133877-9584-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.177.16.142] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.56CAD75F.0014, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 1820cace93e9922ec6f3cd9faf0d4182 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160222_014219_157934_1169BD10 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.61 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-4.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [58.251.152.64 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [58.251.152.64 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: wei@redhat.com, hangaohuai@huawei.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, shannon.zhao@linaro.org, zhaoshenglong@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cov@codeaurora.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org From: Shannon Zhao When KVM frees VCPU, it needs to free the perf_event of PMU. Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones --- arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 1 + include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 2 ++ virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+) -- 2.0.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c index f54264c..d2c2cc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) kvm_mmu_free_memory_caches(vcpu); kvm_timer_vcpu_terminate(vcpu); kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(vcpu); + kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(vcpu); kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vcpu); } diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h index 46b773e..9cebf03 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx); void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val); u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); +void kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return 0; } static inline void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} +static inline void kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c index 92fff9a..0427af8 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c @@ -101,6 +101,27 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } } +/** + * kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy - free perf event of PMU for cpu + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer + * + */ +void kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int i; + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu; + + for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) { + struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->pmc[i]; + + if (pmc->perf_event) { + perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event); + perf_event_release_kernel(pmc->perf_event); + pmc->perf_event = NULL; + } + } +} + u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { u64 val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;