From patchwork Thu Sep 19 08:45:51 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jie Zhan X-Patchwork-Id: 829652 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C7E9199247; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.32 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726735915; cv=none; b=tZCkx522JhCxGMMGs4J+sG6LPei9rRH+bnlQujs7i+Mycoku77baT2zXfCkwJO+iPVTF74m2qybrpOVpE27xJmQHUhUgCkcHcg5r1yRAFk7/tJ7JRHWHRP0L1OcVvONNm8gwChx/NNmCu5dQB3c0UWCITAtXWMisGKapq+pfS0Q= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726735915; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IqAS0Movy4BFYsQGAZNHcdrZatMN+0hZqM9XljpmpeI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=K5c+ZYQsgrUqIlBdLu0XUGZeXCTyacohPp9D94z9YWdV4W+oTdf/dBGeG3Rl8+IuVJPadDv3mATqu1guy+42blM3hGBn0yBPwlhfc+iFHdptNxyT1CEUTLW3YNRx+c0m1Pt5cMgLyTDIsnn8QlG9LQBosmwmuU9KYmqqV0JPy8o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=hisilicon.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hisilicon.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.32 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=hisilicon.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hisilicon.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.44]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4X8Tln4Xkdz1ym6V; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:51:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500019.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.137]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407FA140202; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:51:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.90.30.45) by dggpeml500019.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:51:48 +0800 From: Jie Zhan To: , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] cppc_cpufreq: Use desired perf if feedback ctrs are 0 or unchanged Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:45:51 +0800 Message-ID: <20240919084552.3591400-2-zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20240919084552.3591400-1-zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> References: <20240919084552.3591400-1-zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpeml500019.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.137) The CPPC performance feedback counters could be 0 or unchanged when the target cpu is in a low-power idle state, e.g. power-gated or clock-gated. When the counters are 0, cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() returns 0 KHz, which makes cpufreq_online() get a false error and fail to generate a cpufreq policy. When the counters are unchanged, the existing cppc_perf_from_fbctrs() returns a cached desired perf, but some platforms may update the real frequency back to the desired perf reg. For the above cases in cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(), get the latest desired perf to reflect the frequency; if failed, return the cached desired perf. Fixes: 6a4fec4f6d30 ("cpufreq: cppc: cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() returns zero in all error cases.") Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu Reviewed-by: Huisong Li --- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index bafa32dd375d..e55192303a9f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ static void cppc_scale_freq_workfn(struct kthread_work *work) perf = cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(cpu_data, &cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs, &fb_ctrs); + if (!perf) + return; + cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs = fb_ctrs; perf <<= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; @@ -726,11 +729,26 @@ static int cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data, /* Check to avoid divide-by zero and invalid delivered_perf */ if (!delta_reference || !delta_delivered) - return cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf; + return 0; return (reference_perf * delta_delivered) / delta_reference; } +static int cppc_get_perf_ctrs_sample(int cpu, + struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *fb_ctrs_t0, + struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *fb_ctrs_t1) +{ + int ret; + + ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, fb_ctrs_t0); + if (ret) + return ret; + + udelay(2); /* 2usec delay between sampling */ + + return cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, fb_ctrs_t1); +} + static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) { struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0 = {0}, fb_ctrs_t1 = {0}; @@ -746,18 +764,29 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); - ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs_t0); - if (ret) - return 0; - - udelay(2); /* 2usec delay between sampling */ - - ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs_t1); - if (ret) - return 0; + ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs_sample(cpu, &fb_ctrs_t0, &fb_ctrs_t1); + if (ret) { + if (ret == -EFAULT) + goto out_invalid_counters; + else + return 0; + } delivered_perf = cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(cpu_data, &fb_ctrs_t0, &fb_ctrs_t1); + if (!delivered_perf) + goto out_invalid_counters; + + return cppc_perf_to_khz(&cpu_data->perf_caps, delivered_perf); + +out_invalid_counters: + /* + * Feedback counters could be unchanged or 0 when a cpu enters a + * low-power idle state, e.g. clock-gated or power-gated. + * Get the lastest or cached desired perf for reflecting frequency. + */ + if (cppc_get_desired_perf(cpu, &delivered_perf)) + delivered_perf = cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf; return cppc_perf_to_khz(&cpu_data->perf_caps, delivered_perf); }