From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:14 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788826 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD8E13CFB6; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933039; cv=none; b=PGjgRNKB/EHzVmMvOuqQsRcGVIAgAZImmC+3yWOQ+B1yGnAZYhjI/ESjayHiYT1gEXovZkQ1OxgtnwxInTjRFU7tOwgwX6tjaIcndy2HNPLA370UgtJYE6IjSmqPIx/2SMDL//yeiLMK3WHDWKdbrNUF/tUlEmm5QAD8QYmiwLg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933039; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8PkKGvCQLT87jpkOOWeRPKjETbhhsSNzxiAzXF+L118=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a1+BIy6KDchVqygIvBVA7oC8yGpGO6PKisxn4oC7ITzPts3IgmoLqYs+m3DsNg+xToT9QMIL+CZaphJTJy8Ci+/ABxqtc1dXI9VA5tGtosBSPIvp+6zwu+TtGk3wr9ISlO5OnijAWJmdUcJ0hDOIDbK+i1sYYzKE8E0phyH2EkA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK2K3jThz6K92Z; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:39:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D554B140B55; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:43:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:43:55 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 13/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-14-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse To support virtual CPU hotplug, ACPI has added an 'online capable' bit to the MADT GICC entries. This indicates a disabled CPU entry may not be possible to online via PSCI until firmware has set enabled bit in _STA. This means that a "usable" GIC is one that is marked as either enabled, or online capable. Therefore, change acpi_gicc_is_usable() to check both bits. However, we need to change the test in gic_acpi_match_gicc() back to testing just the enabled bit so the count of enabled distributors is correct. What about the redistributor in the GICC entry? ACPI doesn't want to say. Assume the worst: When a redistributor is described in the GICC entry, but the entry is marked as disabled at boot, assume the redistributor is inaccessible. The GICv3 driver doesn't support late online of redistributors, so this means the corresponding CPU can't be brought online either. Clear the possible and present bits. Systems that want CPU hotplug in a VM can ensure their redistributors are always-on, and describe them that way with a GICR entry in the MADT. When mapping redistributors found via GICC entries, handle the case where the arch code believes the CPU is present and possible, but it does not have an accessible redistributor. Print a warning and clear the present and possible bits. Signed-off-by: James Morse Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No Change. --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/acpi.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 10af15f93d4d..66132251c1bb 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -2363,11 +2363,25 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header; u32 reg = readl_relaxed(acpi_data.dist_base + GICD_PIDR2) & GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_MASK; u32 size = reg == GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_GICv4 ? SZ_64K * 4 : SZ_64K * 2; + int cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(gicc->uid); void __iomem *redist_base; if (!acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc)) return 0; + /* + * Capable but disabled CPUs can be brought online later. What about + * the redistributor? ACPI doesn't want to say! + * Virtual hotplug systems can use the MADT's "always-on" GICR entries. + * Otherwise, prevent such CPUs from being brought online. + */ + if (!(gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) { + pr_warn_once("CPU %u's redistributor is inaccessible: this CPU can't be brought online\n", cpu); + set_cpu_present(cpu, false); + set_cpu_possible(cpu, false); + return 0; + } + redist_base = ioremap(gicc->gicr_base_address, size); if (!redist_base) return -ENOMEM; @@ -2413,9 +2427,12 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, /* * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means - * GICR base is presented via GICC + * GICR base is presented via GICC. The redistributor is only known to + * be accessible if the GICC is marked as enabled. If this bit is not + * set, we'd need to add the redistributor at runtime, which isn't + * supported. */ - if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) + if (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED && gicc->gicr_base_address) acpi_data.enabled_rdists++; return 0; diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 2629c459738a..6dd396825bb5 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -239,7 +239,8 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry (struct acpi_subtable_header *madt); static inline bool acpi_gicc_is_usable(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc) { - return gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED; + return gicc->flags & (ACPI_MADT_ENABLED | + ACPI_MADT_GICC_ONLINE_CAPABLE); } /* the following numa functions are architecture-dependent */