From patchwork Thu Sep 3 10:51:05 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hans de Goede X-Patchwork-Id: 251671 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A526C433E2 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248C4206A5 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="E0XdJNbv" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728388AbgICKwH (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2020 06:52:07 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:52192 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728343AbgICKv4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2020 06:51:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599130309; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=i4LjoFZKzNRx0QYdGkEhCDj0MPbafDuhon7vtbsVDBA=; b=E0XdJNbvc718o0itP/HENnMpVrIxJUHHhdqHOGBSnjRO6BbptoVpWHiID1ArQaMtqgEyZb kJiKSQRHN4bZ9ePHVs4AaTv0WIw3PpVEip64ssxCySKSVNZLKspw5eDuLJerAyoabo4q5U nFvz7ISrAl/Cd7rA2n3Sd7dMzFyPufw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-258-SmVU_WasNTW8PIdOC9Hg0A-1; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 06:51:47 -0400 X-MC-Unique: SmVU_WasNTW8PIdOC9Hg0A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5807664097; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1.localdomain.com (ovpn-115-4.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977D5784A8; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:51:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Hans de Goede To: Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K?= =?utf-8?b?w7ZuaWc=?= , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , =?utf-8?b?VmlsbGUgU3lyasOkbMOk?= , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown Cc: Hans de Goede , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v9 08/17] pwm: crc: Fix period / duty_cycle times being off by a factor of 256 Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:51:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20200903105114.9969-9-hdegoede@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200903105114.9969-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <20200903105114.9969-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org While looking into adding atomic-pwm support to the pwm-crc driver I noticed something odd, there is a PWM_BASE_CLK define of 6 MHz and there is a clock-divider which divides this with a value between 1-128, and there are 256 duty-cycle steps. The pwm-crc code before this commit assumed that a clock-divider setting of 1 means that the PWM output is running at 6 MHZ, if that is true, where do these 256 duty-cycle steps come from? This would require an internal frequency of 256 * 6 MHz = 1.5 GHz, that seems unlikely for a PMIC which is using a silicon process optimized for power-switching transistors. It is way more likely that there is an 8 bit counter for the duty cycle which acts as an extra fixed divider wrt the PWM output frequency. The main user of the pwm-crc driver is the i915 GPU driver which uses it for backlight control. Lets compare the PWM register values set by the video-BIOS (the GOP), assuming the extra fixed divider is present versus the PWM frequency specified in the Video-BIOS-Tables: Device: PWM Hz set by BIOS PWM Hz specified in VBT Asus T100TA 200 200 Asus T100HA 200 200 Lenovo Miix 2 8 23437 20000 Toshiba WT8-A 23437 20000 So as we can see if we assume the extra division by 256 then the register values set by the GOP are an exact match for the VBT values, where as otherwise the values would be of by a factor of 256. This commit fixes the period / duty_cycle calculations to take the extra division by 256 into account. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Acked-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- Changes in v3: - Use NSEC_PER_USEC instead of adding a new (non-sensical) NSEC_PER_MHZ define --- drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c index 272eeb071147..c056eb9b858c 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c @@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ #define PWM_MAX_LEVEL 0xFF -#define PWM_BASE_CLK 6000000 /* 6 MHz */ -#define PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS 21333 /* 46.875KHz */ +#define PWM_BASE_CLK_MHZ 6 /* 6 MHz */ +#define PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS 5461333 /* 183 Hz */ /** * struct crystalcove_pwm - Crystal Cove PWM controller @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int crc_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm, /* changing the clk divisor, need to disable fisrt */ crc_pwm_disable(c, pwm); - clk_div = PWM_BASE_CLK * period_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC; + clk_div = PWM_BASE_CLK_MHZ * period_ns / (256 * NSEC_PER_USEC); regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, clk_div | PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE);