From patchwork Sat Mar 21 11:25:46 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Gleixner X-Patchwork-Id: 194352 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722F3C4332D for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6C520658 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728619AbgCULe6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:34:58 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:38471 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727071AbgCULe4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:34:56 -0400 Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jFcOQ-0001zH-Br; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:34:18 +0100 Received: from nanos.tec.linutronix.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6861039FD; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:34:17 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20200321113240.936097534@linutronix.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:25:46 +0100 From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Sebastian Siewior , Linus Torvalds , Joel Fernandes , Oleg Nesterov , Davidlohr Bueso , Logan Gunthorpe , Bjorn Helgaas , Kurt Schwemmer , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Felipe Balbi , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kbuild test robot , Nick Hu , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Guo Ren , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Brian Cain , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek , Michael Ellerman , Arnd Bergmann , Geoff Levand , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Paul E . McKenney" , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , Davidlohr Bueso Subject: [patch V3 02/20] pci/switchtec: Replace completion wait queue usage for poll References: <20200321112544.878032781@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8-bit X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1, SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior The poll callback is using the completion wait queue and sticks it into poll_wait() to wake up pollers after a command has completed. This works to some extent, but cannot provide EPOLLEXCLUSIVE support because the waker side uses complete_all() which unconditionally wakes up all waiters. complete_all() is required because completions internally use exclusive wait and complete() only wakes up one waiter by default. This mixes conceptually different mechanisms and relies on internal implementation details of completions, which in turn puts contraints on changing the internal implementation of completions. Replace it with a regular wait queue and store the state in struct switchtec_user. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Kurt Schwemmer Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org --- V2: Reworded changelog. --- drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c +++ b/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c @@ -52,10 +52,11 @@ struct switchtec_user { enum mrpc_state state; - struct completion comp; + wait_queue_head_t cmd_comp; struct kref kref; struct list_head list; + bool cmd_done; u32 cmd; u32 status; u32 return_code; @@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ static struct switchtec_user *stuser_cre stuser->stdev = stdev; kref_init(&stuser->kref); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&stuser->list); - init_completion(&stuser->comp); + init_waitqueue_head(&stuser->cmd_comp); stuser->event_cnt = atomic_read(&stdev->event_cnt); dev_dbg(&stdev->dev, "%s: %p\n", __func__, stuser); @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ static int mrpc_queue_cmd(struct switcht kref_get(&stuser->kref); stuser->read_len = sizeof(stuser->data); stuser_set_state(stuser, MRPC_QUEUED); - reinit_completion(&stuser->comp); + stuser->cmd_done = false; list_add_tail(&stuser->list, &stdev->mrpc_queue); mrpc_cmd_submit(stdev); @@ -222,7 +223,8 @@ static void mrpc_complete_cmd(struct swi memcpy_fromio(stuser->data, &stdev->mmio_mrpc->output_data, stuser->read_len); out: - complete_all(&stuser->comp); + stuser->cmd_done = true; + wake_up_interruptible(&stuser->cmd_comp); list_del_init(&stuser->list); stuser_put(stuser); stdev->mrpc_busy = 0; @@ -529,10 +531,11 @@ static ssize_t switchtec_dev_read(struct mutex_unlock(&stdev->mrpc_mutex); if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) { - if (!try_wait_for_completion(&stuser->comp)) + if (!stuser->cmd_done) return -EAGAIN; } else { - rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&stuser->comp); + rc = wait_event_interruptible(stuser->cmd_comp, + stuser->cmd_done); if (rc < 0) return rc; } @@ -580,7 +583,7 @@ static __poll_t switchtec_dev_poll(struc struct switchtec_dev *stdev = stuser->stdev; __poll_t ret = 0; - poll_wait(filp, &stuser->comp.wait, wait); + poll_wait(filp, &stuser->cmd_comp, wait); poll_wait(filp, &stdev->event_wq, wait); if (lock_mutex_and_test_alive(stdev)) @@ -588,7 +591,7 @@ static __poll_t switchtec_dev_poll(struc mutex_unlock(&stdev->mrpc_mutex); - if (try_wait_for_completion(&stuser->comp)) + if (stuser->cmd_done) ret |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM; if (stuser->event_cnt != atomic_read(&stdev->event_cnt)) @@ -1272,7 +1275,8 @@ static void stdev_kill(struct switchtec_ /* Wake up and kill any users waiting on an MRPC request */ list_for_each_entry_safe(stuser, tmpuser, &stdev->mrpc_queue, list) { - complete_all(&stuser->comp); + stuser->cmd_done = true; + wake_up_interruptible(&stuser->cmd_comp); list_del_init(&stuser->list); stuser_put(stuser); }