Message ID | 20220908132910.62122-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ACPI: unify _UID handling as integer | expand |
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 3:38 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:29:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > This series is about unification on how we handle ACPI _UID when > > it's known to be an integer-in-the-string. > > > > The idea of merging either all via ACPI tree, or taking ACPI stuff > > for the v6.1 while the rest may be picked up later on by respective > > maintainers separately > > >(currently all depends on Wolfram, other > > patches have got the tags from the maintainers). > > I stand corrected, the perf patch is not tagged yet. > > > Partially compile-tested (x86-64). Tentatively applied as 6.1 material. If there are updates, we'll make changes as they go. Thanks!
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 06:32:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 3:38 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: ... > Tentatively applied as 6.1 material. Thanks! > If there are updates, we'll make changes as they go. There is one at least to fix a warning in the perf patch. Should I resend a fixed patch, just a fix, or entire series with a fixed patch?
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 01:39:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 06:32:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 3:38 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: ... > > Tentatively applied as 6.1 material. > > Thanks! > > > If there are updates, we'll make changes as they go. > > There is one at least to fix a warning in the perf patch. Should I resend > a fixed patch, just a fix, or entire series with a fixed patch? Since LKP found one small issue with SPI patch when CONFIG_ACPI=n, I decided to send a v3. Please, replace this by a new version in your tree, thanks!