From patchwork Tue Jan 11 16:45:23 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 531198 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8DFC4332F for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343821AbiAKRGo (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:06:44 -0500 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:59296 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343798AbiAKRGn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:06:43 -0500 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) (HELO v370.home.net.pl) by /usr/run/smtp (/usr/run/postfix/private/idea_relay_lmtp) via UNIX with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 4.0.0) id 448dd6b6d81b87be; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:06:42 +0100 Received: from kreacher.localnet (unknown [213.134.181.61]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by v370.home.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2BFE66B10D; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:06:41 +0100 (CET) From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux ACPI Cc: LKML , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Hans de Goede Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] ACPI: scan: acpi_scan_init() updates Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:45:23 +0100 Message-ID: <11903300.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CLIENT-IP: 213.134.181.61 X-CLIENT-HOSTNAME: 213.134.181.61 X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudehfedgleejucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecujffqoffgrffnpdggtffipffknecuuegrihhlohhuthemucduhedtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepfdftrghfrggvlhculfdrucghhihsohgtkhhifdcuoehrjhifsehrjhifhihsohgtkhhirdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefhgedtffejheekgeeljeevvedtuefgffeiieejuddutdekgfejvdehueejjeetvdenucfkphepvddufedrudefgedrudekuddriedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepvddufedrudefgedrudekuddriedupdhhvghlohepkhhrvggrtghhvghrrdhlohgtrghlnhgvthdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpedftfgrfhgrvghlucflrdcuhgihshhotghkihdfuceorhhjfiesrhhjfiihshhotghkihdrnhgvtheqpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqrggtphhisehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqkhgvrhhnvghlsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprghnughrihihrdhshhgvvhgthhgvnhhkoheslhhinhhugidrihhnthgvlhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehmihhkrgdrfigvshhtvghrsggvrhhgsehlihhnuhigrdhinhhtvghlrdgtohhmpdhr tghpthhtohephhguvghgohgvuggvsehrvgguhhgrthdrtghomh X-DCC--Metrics: v370.home.net.pl 1024; Body=5 Fuz1=5 Fuz2=5 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi All, There are some minor defects in acpi_scan_init() and because recent changes cause static checkers to catch them, it is better to address them right away. Please see patch changelogs for the details. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede