From patchwork Mon Feb 17 09:25:10 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Viresh Kumar X-Patchwork-Id: 24752 Return-Path: X-Original-To: linaro@patches.linaro.org Delivered-To: linaro@patches.linaro.org Received: from mail-pa0-f70.google.com (mail-pa0-f70.google.com [209.85.220.70]) by ip-10-151-82-157.ec2.internal (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11802202B2 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:26:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f70.google.com with SMTP id kq14sf36512940pab.1 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:delivered-to:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:in-reply-to:references :sender:precedence:list-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:mailing-list:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-unsubscribe; bh=ZiKLxd9IrZyA1XA0qQ68Opz15euFfbPO8Rwb6MCf77Q=; b=JPWS1tyh6tyNnmLIsl4OFe/Ui782SFnMaEvdOcPLGSoPqhElc02hYFAFGbSckonuzJ PVUfuqr/RmctPa5Ux+rOKj3Ts8mJu2oxTwDFUtAbsk4hsfwySbpFLXewtAHQ07Rx3AeV fseYMHEp0Mtq6vgehPuhQQSkK0+eyzhfVKSOGc5eQE3Z7RNYDG2ce+M2pXRvIJnjZBMO b1kXhzQJFsDatvEcBiX6+AqF1p/cvp3lGBi5FvylnjGgCUzMoTeO5amNAAbkDI+Oy8O6 vJ38juMZ3w/TKxAvdBrlddl47styIa9lRpmxnLV5rDi3uSj2jYKAYQcdOnrx3bMfWes2 +Ouw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkWNFVij8KXDBzb/bTTv+39cqng/q9qbORJBilNzMLilqbdmNb8SVUIu09EmsVfu3VJ0qST X-Received: by 10.69.16.98 with SMTP id fv2mr9892383pbd.7.1392629177164; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: patchwork-forward@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.109.101 with SMTP id k92ls770803qgf.78.gmail; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:16 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.52.61.133 with SMTP id p5mr13714881vdr.4.1392629176813; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ve0-f175.google.com (mail-ve0-f175.google.com [209.85.128.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o6si4359222vcn.21.2014.02.17.01.26.16 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.128.175 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org) client-ip=209.85.128.175; Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c14so11712143vea.20 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:16 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.52.246.133 with SMTP id xw5mr10139966vdc.32.1392629176729; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:16 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-To: patchwork-forward@linaro.org X-Forwarded-For: patch@linaro.org patchwork-forward@linaro.org Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.220.174.196 with SMTP id u4csp123658vcz; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:16 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.228.37 with SMTP id sf5mr25301125pac.19.1392629175851; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r3si14123458pbh.280.2014.02.17.01.26.15; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:26:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752252AbaBQJZw (ORCPT + 11 others); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:25:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:48090 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752630AbaBQJZu (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:25:50 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id e4so2154018wiv.5 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:25:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.219.44 with SMTP id pl12mr12189882wic.12.1392629148537; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:25:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([213.122.173.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n15sm30582817wij.3.2014.02.17.01.25.44 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:25:47 -0800 (PST) From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, jinchoi@broadcom.com, tianyu.lan@intel.com, sebastian.capella@linaro.org, jhbird.choi@samsung.com, Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH V6 4/7] cpufreq: Implement cpufreq_generic_suspend() Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:55:10 +0530 Message-Id: <93d247abf8b2a7976e280653335af16f97bedf95.1392629003.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: list List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Removed-Original-Auth: Dkim didn't pass. X-Original-Sender: viresh.kumar@linaro.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.128.175 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org) smtp.mail=patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org Mailing-list: list patchwork-forward@linaro.org; contact patchwork-forward+owners@linaro.org X-Google-Group-Id: 836684582541 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Multiple platforms need to set CPU to a particular frequency before suspending system. And so they need a common infrastructure which is provided by this patch. Those platforms just need to initialize their ->suspend() pointers with the generic routine. Tested-by: Stephen Warren Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index c240232..48315e0 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1578,6 +1578,32 @@ static struct subsys_interface cpufreq_interface = { .remove_dev = cpufreq_remove_dev, }; +/* + * In case platform wants some specific frequency to be configured + * during suspend.. + */ +int cpufreq_generic_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + int ret; + + if (!policy->suspend_freq) { + pr_err("%s: suspend_freq can't be zero\n", __func__); + return -EINVAL; + } + + pr_debug("%s: Setting suspend-freq: %u\n", __func__, + policy->suspend_freq); + + ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->suspend_freq, + CPUFREQ_RELATION_H); + if (ret) + pr_err("%s: unable to set suspend-freq: %u. err: %d\n", + __func__, policy->suspend_freq, ret); + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_generic_suspend); + /** * cpufreq_suspend() - Suspend CPUFreq governors * diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index 94ed907..325bab0 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ struct cpufreq_policy { unsigned int max; /* in kHz */ unsigned int cur; /* in kHz, only needed if cpufreq * governors are used */ + unsigned int suspend_freq; /* freq to set during suspend */ + unsigned int policy; /* see above */ struct cpufreq_governor *governor; /* see below */ void *governor_data; @@ -299,6 +301,7 @@ cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ void cpufreq_suspend(void); void cpufreq_resume(void); +int cpufreq_generic_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); #else static inline void cpufreq_suspend(void) {} static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}