@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ virBhyveDomainCapsFill(virDomainCapsPtr caps,
caps->os.supported = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_YES;
+ caps->os.loader.supported = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_NO;
if (bhyvecaps & BHYVE_CAP_LPC_BOOTROM) {
caps->os.loader.supported = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_YES;
VIR_DOMAIN_CAPS_ENUM_SET(caps->os.loader.type,
@@ -98,12 +99,21 @@ virBhyveDomainCapsFill(virDomainCapsPtr caps,
}
+ caps->graphics.supported = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_NO;
+ caps->video.supported = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_NO;
if (bhyvecaps & BHYVE_CAP_FBUF) {
caps->graphics.supported = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_YES;
caps->video.supported = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_YES;
VIR_DOMAIN_CAPS_ENUM_SET(caps->graphics.type, VIR_DOMAIN_GRAPHICS_TYPE_VNC);
VIR_DOMAIN_CAPS_ENUM_SET(caps->video.modelType, VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_GOP);
}
+
+ caps->hostdev.supported = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_NO;
+ caps->iothreads = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_NO;
+ caps->vmcoreinfo = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_NO;
+ caps->genid = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_NO;
+ caps->gic.supported = VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_NO;
+
return 0;
}
<hostdev> and <features> are not supported. <loader>, <graphics>, and <video> are supported conditionally Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> --- This patch is untested. If someone has a bhyve build setup I'd appreciate a test src/bhyve/bhyve_capabilities.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) -- 2.20.1 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list