Message ID | 20231017130526.2216827-7-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Improve loader environment variable handling | expand |
On 2023-10-17 09:05, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > Instead of ignoring ill-formatted tunable strings, first, check all the > tunable definitions are correct and then set each tunable value. It > means that partially invalid strings, like "key1=value1:key2=key2=value' > or 'key1=value':key2=value2=value2' do not enable 'key1=value1'. It > avoids possible user-defined errors in tunable definitions. > > Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu. > --- Harsher than 5/19, but fair I guess. Please send v3 with a tiny nit fixup I've mentioned below. Thanks, Sid > elf/dl-tunables.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > elf/tst-tunables.c | 13 ++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/elf/dl-tunables.c b/elf/dl-tunables.c > index 59bee61124..5d4b8c5bc0 100644 > --- a/elf/dl-tunables.c > +++ b/elf/dl-tunables.c > @@ -154,17 +154,29 @@ __tunable_set_val (tunable_id_t id, tunable_val_t *valp, tunable_num_t *minp, > do_tunable_update_val (cur, valp, minp, maxp); > } > > -/* Parse the tunable string VALSTRING. VALSTRING is a duplicated values, > - where delimiters ':' are replaced with '\0', so string tunables are null > - terminated. */ > -static void > -parse_tunables (char *valstring) > +struct tunable_toset_t > +{ > + tunable_t *t; > + const char *value; > +}; > + > +enum { tunables_list_size = array_length (tunable_list) }; > + > +/* Parse the tunable string VALSTRING and set TUNABLES with the found tunables > + and their respectibles values. VALSTRING is a duplicated values, where > + delimiters ':' are replaced with '\0', so string tunables are null > + terminated. > + Return the number of tunables found (including 0 if the string is empty) > + or -1 if for a ill-formatted definition. */ > +static int > +parse_tunables_string (char *valstring, struct tunable_toset_t *tunables) > { > if (valstring == NULL || *valstring == '\0') > - return; > + return 0; > > char *p = valstring; > bool done = false; > + int ntunables = 0; > > while (!done) > { > @@ -177,7 +189,7 @@ parse_tunables (char *valstring) > /* If we reach the end of the string before getting a valid name-value > pair, bail out. */ > if (*p == '\0') > - break; > + return -1; > > /* We did not find a valid name-value pair before encountering the > colon. */ > @@ -190,30 +202,44 @@ parse_tunables (char *valstring) > /* Skip the ':' or '='. */ > p++; > > - const char *value = p; > + char *value = p; > > while (*p != '=' && *p != ':' && *p != '\0') > p++; > > if (*p == '=') > - break; > + return -1; > else if (*p == '\0') > done = true; > else > *p++ = '\0'; > > /* Add the tunable if it exists. */ > - for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof (tunable_list) / sizeof (tunable_t); i++) > + for (size_t i = 0; i < tunables_list_size; i++) > { > tunable_t *cur = &tunable_list[i]; > > if (tunable_is_name (cur->name, name)) > { > - tunable_initialize (cur, value); > + tunables[ntunables++] = (struct tunable_toset_t) { cur, value }; > break; > } > } > } > + > + return ntunables; > +} > + > +static void > +parse_tunables (char *valstring) > +{ > + struct tunable_toset_t tunables[tunables_list_size]; > + int ntunables = parse_tunables_string (valstring, tunables); > + if (ntunables == -1) > + return; You don't actually need this; the for loop below will return without doing anything if ntunables == -1. > + > + for (int i = 0; i < ntunables; i++) > + tunable_initialize (tunables[i].t, tunables[i].value); > } > > /* Initialize the tunables list from the environment. For now we only use the > @@ -240,7 +266,7 @@ __tunables_init (char **envp) > continue; > } > > - for (int i = 0; i < sizeof (tunable_list) / sizeof (tunable_t); i++) > + for (int i = 0; i < tunables_list_size; i++) > { > tunable_t *cur = &tunable_list[i]; > > diff --git a/elf/tst-tunables.c b/elf/tst-tunables.c > index 03039b5260..e124fa4c6d 100644 > --- a/elf/tst-tunables.c > +++ b/elf/tst-tunables.c > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static const struct test_t > 0, > 0, > }, > - /* If there is a ill-formatted key=value, everything after is also ignored. */ > + /* Ill-formatted tunables string is not parsed. */ > { > "glibc.malloc.mmap_threshold=glibc.malloc.mmap_threshold=4096:glibc.malloc.check=2", > 0, > @@ -186,13 +186,18 @@ static const struct test_t > 0, > 0, > }, > - /* Valid tunables set before ill-formatted ones are set. */ > { > "glibc.malloc.check=2:glibc.malloc.mmap_threshold=4096=4096", > - 2, > 0, > 0, > - } > + 0, > + }, > + { > + "glibc.malloc.check=2:glibc.malloc.mmap_threshold=4096=4096", > + 0, > + 0, > + 0, > + }, > }; > > static int
On 27/10/23 07:25, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > > On 2023-10-17 09:05, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: >> Instead of ignoring ill-formatted tunable strings, first, check all the >> tunable definitions are correct and then set each tunable value. It >> means that partially invalid strings, like "key1=value1:key2=key2=value' >> or 'key1=value':key2=value2=value2' do not enable 'key1=value1'. It >> avoids possible user-defined errors in tunable definitions. >> >> Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu. >> --- > > Harsher than 5/19, but fair I guess. Please send v3 with a tiny nit fixup I've mentioned below. Ack. >> + >> + return ntunables; >> +} >> + >> +static void >> +parse_tunables (char *valstring) >> +{ >> + struct tunable_toset_t tunables[tunables_list_size]; >> + int ntunables = parse_tunables_string (valstring, tunables); >> + if (ntunables == -1) >> + return; > > You don't actually need this; the for loop below will return without doing anything if ntunables == -1. Ack.
diff --git a/elf/dl-tunables.c b/elf/dl-tunables.c index 59bee61124..5d4b8c5bc0 100644 --- a/elf/dl-tunables.c +++ b/elf/dl-tunables.c @@ -154,17 +154,29 @@ __tunable_set_val (tunable_id_t id, tunable_val_t *valp, tunable_num_t *minp, do_tunable_update_val (cur, valp, minp, maxp); } -/* Parse the tunable string VALSTRING. VALSTRING is a duplicated values, - where delimiters ':' are replaced with '\0', so string tunables are null - terminated. */ -static void -parse_tunables (char *valstring) +struct tunable_toset_t +{ + tunable_t *t; + const char *value; +}; + +enum { tunables_list_size = array_length (tunable_list) }; + +/* Parse the tunable string VALSTRING and set TUNABLES with the found tunables + and their respectibles values. VALSTRING is a duplicated values, where + delimiters ':' are replaced with '\0', so string tunables are null + terminated. + Return the number of tunables found (including 0 if the string is empty) + or -1 if for a ill-formatted definition. */ +static int +parse_tunables_string (char *valstring, struct tunable_toset_t *tunables) { if (valstring == NULL || *valstring == '\0') - return; + return 0; char *p = valstring; bool done = false; + int ntunables = 0; while (!done) { @@ -177,7 +189,7 @@ parse_tunables (char *valstring) /* If we reach the end of the string before getting a valid name-value pair, bail out. */ if (*p == '\0') - break; + return -1; /* We did not find a valid name-value pair before encountering the colon. */ @@ -190,30 +202,44 @@ parse_tunables (char *valstring) /* Skip the ':' or '='. */ p++; - const char *value = p; + char *value = p; while (*p != '=' && *p != ':' && *p != '\0') p++; if (*p == '=') - break; + return -1; else if (*p == '\0') done = true; else *p++ = '\0'; /* Add the tunable if it exists. */ - for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof (tunable_list) / sizeof (tunable_t); i++) + for (size_t i = 0; i < tunables_list_size; i++) { tunable_t *cur = &tunable_list[i]; if (tunable_is_name (cur->name, name)) { - tunable_initialize (cur, value); + tunables[ntunables++] = (struct tunable_toset_t) { cur, value }; break; } } } + + return ntunables; +} + +static void +parse_tunables (char *valstring) +{ + struct tunable_toset_t tunables[tunables_list_size]; + int ntunables = parse_tunables_string (valstring, tunables); + if (ntunables == -1) + return; + + for (int i = 0; i < ntunables; i++) + tunable_initialize (tunables[i].t, tunables[i].value); } /* Initialize the tunables list from the environment. For now we only use the @@ -240,7 +266,7 @@ __tunables_init (char **envp) continue; } - for (int i = 0; i < sizeof (tunable_list) / sizeof (tunable_t); i++) + for (int i = 0; i < tunables_list_size; i++) { tunable_t *cur = &tunable_list[i]; diff --git a/elf/tst-tunables.c b/elf/tst-tunables.c index 03039b5260..e124fa4c6d 100644 --- a/elf/tst-tunables.c +++ b/elf/tst-tunables.c @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static const struct test_t 0, 0, }, - /* If there is a ill-formatted key=value, everything after is also ignored. */ + /* Ill-formatted tunables string is not parsed. */ { "glibc.malloc.mmap_threshold=glibc.malloc.mmap_threshold=4096:glibc.malloc.check=2", 0, @@ -186,13 +186,18 @@ static const struct test_t 0, 0, }, - /* Valid tunables set before ill-formatted ones are set. */ { "glibc.malloc.check=2:glibc.malloc.mmap_threshold=4096=4096", - 2, 0, 0, - } + 0, + }, + { + "glibc.malloc.check=2:glibc.malloc.mmap_threshold=4096=4096", + 0, + 0, + 0, + }, }; static int