@@ -55,12 +55,14 @@
(udata)->outlen = (olen); \
} while (0)
-#define INIT_UDATA_BUF_OR_NULL(udata, ibuf, obuf, ilen, olen) \
- do { \
- (udata)->inbuf = (ilen) ? (const void __user *) (ibuf) : NULL; \
- (udata)->outbuf = (olen) ? (void __user *) (obuf) : NULL; \
- (udata)->inlen = (ilen); \
- (udata)->outlen = (olen); \
+#define INIT_UDATA_BUF_OR_NULL(udata, ibuf, obuf, ilen, olen) \
+ do { \
+ (udata)->inbuf = (ilen) > 0 ? \
+ (const void __user *) (ibuf) : NULL; \
+ (udata)->outbuf = (olen) > 0 ? \
+ (void __user *) (obuf) : NULL; \
+ (udata)->inlen = (ilen); \
+ (udata)->outlen = (olen); \
} while (0)
/*
When using ccache, we get a harmless warning about the fact that we use the result of a multiplication as a condition: drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c: In function 'ib_uverbs_write': drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c:787:40: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c:787:117: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c:790:50: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c:790:151: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] This changes the macro to explicitly check the number for a positive length, which avoids the warning. Fixes: a96e4e2ffe43 ("IB/uverbs: New macro to set pointers to NULL if length is 0 in INIT_UDATA()") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)