From patchwork Mon Sep 23 15:07:50 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Howells X-Patchwork-Id: 831181 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1F7819E973 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727104140; cv=none; b=kg3ewic5H6s8lLAB8InumNBYkFdCeDck+ItTTqyGgPWBxZSYPCny/p1Dz8hneBptNbhxZMGv8KqLTd1x9iSfhABycQC8uPUGl2eeNGrc/lgKO2C55iFgdMP7JvJD+iovY2ue06Z1yb/c9oH9e5E5Vzj8+EUZ9lj5wOhYCdDAkTc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727104140; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0IYAdn8eY46RygPutjDmNaD9LRl4RSbhlUdXbOFZlss=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=VIZN9CtfCghyyP3RnBq4SDXPfka8YA06Vs6cMrfTC1zM+3R2rcbwBrjqeGMji2vN6W4Ahi7tBgiXzN2VOvPwjOZgayUrvzyd2TjC1INOl4mPzH82hcOATViDg9Z84TNV/6oesfJXX3ccSD1q/rFcAbhVRpK+LuRAWx04IWWVthc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=iEhQYZjU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="iEhQYZjU" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1727104136; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z8v23aDW/AqUoLZapyyeRQboTKixFXScSQEzJQ0mhVc=; b=iEhQYZjUWsS1QQbOU/OgFQkENIj6DpRv0mGhmvzKW/5LjyEs0e9z5rbB91QT7b2Vid4iN2 VNulL+Mr98h6rhnQw01NwRW+KOnv+Ehex9R2DMvaTYl+cTO62cj3yh20kz+CQlA70we01X GfIbu+nOdSgln8ogl03/VDOK1SMnkEk= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-551-DYyLGeXsPkSx-Jt_v0ORCQ-1; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:08:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DYyLGeXsPkSx-Jt_v0ORCQ-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (unknown [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAD5618B63DB; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.com (unknown [10.42.28.145]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C923A1934989; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:08:36 +0000 (UTC) From: David Howells To: Christian Brauner , Steve French , Marc Dionne Cc: David Howells , Paulo Alcantara , Jeff Layton , Matthew Wilcox , netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 6/8] afs: Fix the setting of the server responding flag Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:07:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20240923150756.902363-7-dhowells@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240923150756.902363-1-dhowells@redhat.com> References: <20240923150756.902363-1-dhowells@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 In afs_wait_for_operation(), we set transcribe the call responded flag to the server record that we used after doing the fileserver iteration loop - but it's possible to exit the loop having had a response from the server that we've discarded (e.g. it returned an abort or we started receiving data, but the call didn't complete). This means that op->server might be NULL, but we don't check that before attempting to set the server flag. Fixes: 98f9fda2057b ("afs: Fold the afs_addr_cursor struct in") Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org --- fs/afs/fs_operation.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/afs/fs_operation.c b/fs/afs/fs_operation.c index 3546b087e791..428721bbe4f6 100644 --- a/fs/afs/fs_operation.c +++ b/fs/afs/fs_operation.c @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ void afs_wait_for_operation(struct afs_operation *op) } } - if (op->call_responded) + if (op->call_responded && op->server) set_bit(AFS_SERVER_FL_RESPONDING, &op->server->flags); if (!afs_op_error(op)) {