Message ID | 20220421080735.31698-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: SOF: Rework the firmware ready message handling | expand |
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 11:07:29 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > The firmware ready (fw_ready) message is sent by the firmware to notify the host > that it has been booted up and caries additional information about it's > configuration. > All of this is IPC specific, the message itself is IPC version specific and the > information itself also. > > Move the code to handle the fw_ready message under ipc3.c since the parsing and > interpretation is IPC specific. > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/6] ASoC: SOF: ipc3: Add local implementation for handling fw_ready message commit: b641fb7e019214d3fa2f44c3e562ba388e2a3933 [2/6] ASoC: SOF: Do not check for the fw_ready callback commit: cf64b67eebc222c9388adddc0038f9a59cb9511c [3/6] ASoC: SOF: amd: Do not set fw_ready callback commit: 473dd4ea340c237e59d0c4d1973cf129a1bae504 [4/6] ASoC: SOF: imx: Do not set fw_ready callback commit: b5054161ebd168894b5a1d9d7eb97cd58dcbbb7f [5/6] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Do not set fw_ready callback commit: 0fc88b5d42c646ecf4040f65c0f22cb9df42e69a [6/6] ASoC: SOF: loader: Remove the old fw_ready related code commit: 19faf9ee06224c5db669539a10eae7c63f52f2e6 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark