mbox series

[0/2] ASoC: codecs: Add Awinic AW8738 audio amplifier driver

Message ID 20220301123742.72146-1-stephan@gerhold.net
Headers show
Series ASoC: codecs: Add Awinic AW8738 audio amplifier driver | expand

Message

Stephan Gerhold March 1, 2022, 12:37 p.m. UTC 
This series adds a simple driver and DT schema for the Awinic AW8738 
audio amplifier. It's fairly simple - the main difference to 
simple-amplifier is that there is a "one-wire pulse control" that 
allows configuring the amplifier to one of a few pre-defined modes.

Jonathan Albrieux (1):
  ASoC: codecs: Add Awinic AW8738 audio amplifier driver

Stephan Gerhold (1):
  ASoC: dt-bindings: Add schema for "awinic,aw8738"

 .../bindings/sound/awinic,aw8738.yaml         |  48 ++++++++
 sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig                      |  10 ++
 sound/soc/codecs/Makefile                     |   2 +
 sound/soc/codecs/aw8738.c                     | 104 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/awinic,aw8738.yaml
 create mode 100644 sound/soc/codecs/aw8738.c

Comments

Mark Brown March 1, 2022, 12:47 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 01:37:42PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> From: Jonathan Albrieux <jonathan.albrieux@gmail.com>
> 
> The Awinic AW8738 is a simple audio amplifier using an enable GPIO.
> The main difference to simple-amplifier is that there is a "one-wire
> pulse control" that allows configuring the amplifier to one of a few
> pre-defined modes.

I only have this patch, nothing else from the rest of the series.
What's the story with dependencies?
Mark Brown March 1, 2022, 1:26 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 01:53:12PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:47:10PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I only have this patch, nothing else from the rest of the series.
> > What's the story with dependencies?

> Hmm, I definitely sent the whole series to you. Let's wait a bit longer
> to see if it will still arrive, otherwise let me know and I can try to
> send it again.

Yes, it's turned up OK now - wonder what delayed the earlier bits.