mbox series

[0/2] soundwire: qcom: fix IP version v1.5.1 support

Message ID 20200909160912.3656-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Headers show
Series soundwire: qcom: fix IP version v1.5.1 support | expand

Message

Srinivas Kandagatla Sept. 9, 2020, 4:09 p.m. UTC
While testing Qualcomm soundwire controller version 1.5.1, found two issue,
Firstly the frame shape information configured vs the bus parameters
are out of sync. secondly some ports on this ip version require
block packing mode support.

With this two patches on top of https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/5/220
("[PATCH v2 0/4] soundwire: qcom: add support for mmio soundwire master")
patchset I was able to test 2 WSA speakers!
This patchset depends on this above patchset!

thanks,
srini

Srinivas Kandagatla (2):
  soundwire: qcom: add support to block packing mode
  soundwire: qcom: get max rows and cols info from compatible

 drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Comments

Srinivas Kandagatla Sept. 10, 2020, 8:09 a.m. UTC | #1
On 10/09/2020 07:39, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 09-09-20, 17:09, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> currently the max rows and cols values are hardcoded. In reality
>> these values depend on the IP version. So get these based on
>> device tree compatible strings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> index 1ec0ee931f5b..03c5bc05fc6e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> @@ -69,11 +69,6 @@
>>   #define SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(data, dev, id, reg)	\
>>   			((reg) | ((id) << 16) | ((dev) << 20) | ((data) << 24))
>>   
>> -#define SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL	0 /* Rows = 48 */
>> -#define SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS	48
>> -#define SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL	0 /* Cols = 2 */
>> -#define SWRM_DEFAULT_COL	16
>> -#define SWRM_MAX_COL_VAL	7
>>   #define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID	0xF
>>   #define MAX_FREQ_NUM		1
>>   #define TIMEOUT_MS		(2 * HZ)
>> @@ -107,6 +102,8 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>>   	unsigned int version;
>>   	int num_din_ports;
>>   	int num_dout_ports;
>> +	int cols_index;
>> +	int rows_index;
>>   	unsigned long dout_port_mask;
>>   	unsigned long din_port_mask;
>>   	struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>> @@ -116,6 +113,21 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>>   	int (*reg_write)(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg, int val);
>>   };
>>   
>> +struct qcom_swrm_data {
>> +	int default_cols;
>> +	int default_rows;
> 
> unsigned int for these?
Yes, we could do that but does it really add anything, given the range 
is up to 256.

> 
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct qcom_swrm_data swrm_v1_3_data = {
>> +	.default_rows = 48,
>> +	.default_cols = 16,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct qcom_swrm_data swrm_v1_5_data = {
>> +	.default_rows = 50,
>> +	.default_cols = 16,
>> +};
>> +
>>   #define to_qcom_sdw(b)	container_of(b, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, bus)
>>   
>>   static int qcom_swrm_ahb_reg_read(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg,
>> @@ -302,8 +314,8 @@ static int qcom_swrm_init(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>>   	u32 val;
>>   
>>   	/* Clear Rows and Cols */
>> -	val = (SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT |
>> -	       SWRM_MIN_COL_VAL << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT);
>> +	val = ctrl->rows_index << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT |
>> +		ctrl->cols_index << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT;
> 
> use FIELD_{GET|SET} / u32_encode_bits for these
> 
> Please rebase on sdw-next, this has already been updated in next

Yes, I will do that!
> 
>>   
>>   	ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ADDR(0), val);
>>   
>> @@ -382,8 +394,8 @@ static int qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>>   	val &= ~SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_BMSK;
>>   	val &= ~SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_BMSK;
>>   
>> -	val |= (SWRM_MAX_ROW_VAL << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT |
>> -		SWRM_MAX_COL_VAL << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT);
>> +	val |= ctrl->rows_index << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_ROW_CTRL_SHFT |
>> +	       ctrl->cols_index << SWRM_MCP_FRAME_CTRL_BANK_COL_CTRL_SHFT;
>>   
>>   	return ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, reg, val);
>>   }
>> @@ -784,6 +796,7 @@ static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	struct sdw_master_prop *prop;
>>   	struct sdw_bus_params *params;
>>   	struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl;
>> +	const struct qcom_swrm_data *data;
>>   	struct resource *res;
>>   	int ret;
>>   	u32 val;
>> @@ -792,6 +805,9 @@ static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	if (!ctrl)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>> +	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> 
> how about checking data is valid?
I think the check would be unnecessary here, as we would not endup here 
without a matching compatible!

--srini
> 
>> +	ctrl->rows_index = sdw_find_row_index(data->default_rows);
>> +	ctrl->cols_index = sdw_find_col_index(data->default_cols);
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_SLIMBUS
>>   	if (dev->parent->bus == &slimbus_bus) {
>>   #else
>> @@ -844,8 +860,8 @@ static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	params = &ctrl->bus.params;
>>   	params->max_dr_freq = DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ;
>>   	params->curr_dr_freq = DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ;
>> -	params->col = SWRM_DEFAULT_COL;
>> -	params->row = SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS;
>> +	params->col = data->default_cols;
>> +	params->row = data->default_rows;
>>   	ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_STATUS, &val);
>>   	params->curr_bank = val & SWRM_MCP_STATUS_BANK_NUM_MASK;
>>   	params->next_bank = !params->curr_bank;
>> @@ -855,8 +871,8 @@ static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	prop->num_clk_gears = 0;
>>   	prop->num_clk_freq = MAX_FREQ_NUM;
>>   	prop->clk_freq = &qcom_swrm_freq_tbl[0];
>> -	prop->default_col = SWRM_DEFAULT_COL;
>> -	prop->default_row = SWRM_DEFAULT_ROWS;
>> +	prop->default_col = data->default_cols;
>> +	prop->default_row = data->default_rows;
>>   
>>   	ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION, &ctrl->version);
>>   
>> @@ -907,8 +923,8 @@ static int qcom_swrm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   }
>>   
>>   static const struct of_device_id qcom_swrm_of_match[] = {
>> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.3.0", },
>> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.5.1", },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.3.0", .data = &swrm_v1_3_data },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.5.1", .data = &swrm_v1_5_data },
>>   	{/* sentinel */},
>>   };
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.21.0
>