Message ID | 1638531140-25899-1-git-send-email-srivasam@codeaurora.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add pin control support for lpass sc7280 | expand |
On Fri, 03 Dec 2021 17:02:16 +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote: > Change generic lpass lpi pincotrol bindings file to SoC specific file, > to distinguish and accomadate other SoC specific dt bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.com> > Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> > --- > .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 130 --------------------- > .../pinctrl/qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml: $id: relative path/filename doesn't match actual path or filename expected: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pinctrl/qcom,sm8250-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml# doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1563181 This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch series is generally the most recent rc1. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit.
On Fri 03 Dec 03:32 PST 2021, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote: > From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> > > Update bulk clock voting to optional voting as ADSP bypass platform doesn't > need macro and decodec clocks, these are maintained as power domains and > operated from lpass audio core cc. > > Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> > Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c > index bcc12f6..c2a1110 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c > @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ int lpi_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pctrl->slew_base), > "Slew resource not provided\n"); > > - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); > + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); If some platforms requires this clock and others doesn't have one, then please make this statement conditional on the compatible, rather than making it optional on both. Thanks, Bjorn > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Can't get clocks\n"); > > -- > Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., > is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. >
On 12/6/2021 8:05 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: Thanks for Your Time Bjorn!!! > On Fri 03 Dec 03:32 PST 2021, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote: > >> From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> >> >> Update bulk clock voting to optional voting as ADSP bypass platform doesn't >> need macro and decodec clocks, these are maintained as power domains and >> operated from lpass audio core cc. >> >> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org> >> Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c >> index bcc12f6..c2a1110 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c >> @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ int lpi_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pctrl->slew_base), >> "Slew resource not provided\n"); >> >> - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); >> + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, MAX_LPI_NUM_CLKS, pctrl->clks); > If some platforms requires this clock and others doesn't have one, then > please make this statement conditional on the compatible, rather than > making it optional on both. > > Thanks, > Bjorn Okay. will add one flag in lpi_pinctrl_variant_data structure and handle it accordingly. >> if (ret) >> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Can't get clocks\n"); >> >> -- >> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., >> is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. >>