Message ID | 20170505115725.1424772-9-arnd@arndb.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | fixes for all remaining known warnings | expand |
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:57:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@unisys.com> > > Commit f84bd6267d623b49f196d54ba9edc41ff1c4d5e3 upstream > > Properly handle the return value from queue_delayed_work() - it's a > bool, not an int, so using a less than comparison isn't appropriate. > > This mistake was found by David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>. > > [arnd: the fix is from 4.4 but needed some minor fixup to adapt > to context changes] Ah, I already did this one, bug missed that there was an upstream change. I'll take this as well, thanks. greg k-h
diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c index 3dd1c04d0e14..95802d0e9cc6 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ BOOL visor_periodic_work_nextperiod(struct periodic_work *pw) pw->want_to_stop = FALSE; rc = TRUE; /* yes, TRUE; see visor_periodic_work_stop() */ goto unlock; - } else if (queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work, - pw->jiffy_interval) < 0) { + } else if (!queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work, + pw->jiffy_interval)) { ERRDEV(pw->devnam, "queue_delayed_work failed!"); pw->is_scheduled = FALSE; rc = FALSE; @@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ BOOL visor_periodic_work_start(struct periodic_work *pw) goto unlock; } INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&pw->work, &periodic_work_func); - if (queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work, - pw->jiffy_interval) < 0) { + if (!queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work, + pw->jiffy_interval)) { ERRDEV(pw->devnam, "%s queue_delayed_work failed!", __func__); rc = FALSE; goto unlock;