Message ID | 20250509153352.7187-2-tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Some (drm_sched_|dma_)fence lifetime issues | expand |
On 5/9/25 17:47, Matthew Brost wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 04:33:40PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> Replace open-coded helper with the subsystem one. >> > > You probably can just send this one by itself as it good cleanup and > independent. > > Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Any objections that I start to push those patches to drm-misc-next or do you want to take this one through the i915 branch? Regards, Christian. > >> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 7 +------ >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c >> index 7127e90c1a8f..991666fd9f85 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c >> @@ -106,11 +106,6 @@ static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence, >> rcu_read_unlock(); >> } >> >> -static inline bool __dma_fence_is_chain(const struct dma_fence *fence) >> -{ >> - return fence->ops == &dma_fence_chain_ops; >> -} >> - >> void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence, >> const struct i915_sched_attr *attr) >> { >> @@ -126,7 +121,7 @@ void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence, >> >> for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; i++) >> fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr); >> - } else if (__dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) { >> + } else if (dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) { >> struct dma_fence *iter; >> >> /* The chain is ordered; if we boost the last, we boost all */ >> -- >> 2.48.0 >>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c index 7127e90c1a8f..991666fd9f85 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c @@ -106,11 +106,6 @@ static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence, rcu_read_unlock(); } -static inline bool __dma_fence_is_chain(const struct dma_fence *fence) -{ - return fence->ops == &dma_fence_chain_ops; -} - void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence, const struct i915_sched_attr *attr) { @@ -126,7 +121,7 @@ void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence, for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; i++) fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr); - } else if (__dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) { + } else if (dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) { struct dma_fence *iter; /* The chain is ordered; if we boost the last, we boost all */
Replace open-coded helper with the subsystem one. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)