Message ID | 20250506143512.4315-6-philmd@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [PULL,01/22] bsd-user: add option to enable plugins | expand |
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Include "exec/target_page.h" to be able to compile HVF on x86_64: > > ../target/i386/hvf/hvf.c:139:49: error: use of undeclared identifier 'TARGET_PAGE_SIZE' > uint64_t dirty_page_start = gpa & ~(TARGET_PAGE_SIZE - 1u); > ^ > ../target/i386/hvf/hvf.c:141:45: error: use of undeclared identifier 'TARGET_PAGE_SIZE' > hv_vm_protect(dirty_page_start, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, > > Fixes: 9c2ff9cdc9b ("exec/cpu-all: remove exec/target_page include") > Reported-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> > Reported-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > Message-Id: <20250425174310.70890-1-philmd@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> FYI Paolo merged a patch from me that does the same thing. My patch is already in the master branch. Wei. > --- > target/i386/hvf/hvf.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c > index 99e37a33e50..b16fb066758 100644 > --- a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c > +++ b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ > #include "qemu/error-report.h" > #include "qemu/memalign.h" > #include "qapi/error.h" > +#include "exec/target_page.h" > #include "migration/blocker.h" > > #include "system/hvf.h" > -- > 2.47.1 >
Hi Wei, On 7/5/25 08:35, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> Include "exec/target_page.h" to be able to compile HVF on x86_64: >> >> ../target/i386/hvf/hvf.c:139:49: error: use of undeclared identifier 'TARGET_PAGE_SIZE' >> uint64_t dirty_page_start = gpa & ~(TARGET_PAGE_SIZE - 1u); >> ^ >> ../target/i386/hvf/hvf.c:141:45: error: use of undeclared identifier 'TARGET_PAGE_SIZE' >> hv_vm_protect(dirty_page_start, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, >> >> Fixes: 9c2ff9cdc9b ("exec/cpu-all: remove exec/target_page include") >> Reported-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> >> Reported-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> >> Message-Id: <20250425174310.70890-1-philmd@linaro.org> >> Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> > > FYI Paolo merged a patch from me that does the same thing. My patch is > already in the master branch. Paolo said he'd replace your patch by this older one which mentions the problematic commit, which is why I didn't notice your patch, I was expecting this one to disappear on rebase. I don't plan to repost this PR except if there is a serious problem with it. In this case, we can still revert if we are picky. Duplicated includes aren't a problem, missing ones are. BTW since you are testing / using HVF on x86, do you know if your employer could help extending our CI infrastructure coverage for your use cases? Regards, Phil.
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 01:20:49PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi Wei, > > On 7/5/25 08:35, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > > Include "exec/target_page.h" to be able to compile HVF on x86_64: > > > > > > ../target/i386/hvf/hvf.c:139:49: error: use of undeclared identifier 'TARGET_PAGE_SIZE' > > > uint64_t dirty_page_start = gpa & ~(TARGET_PAGE_SIZE - 1u); > > > ^ > > > ../target/i386/hvf/hvf.c:141:45: error: use of undeclared identifier 'TARGET_PAGE_SIZE' > > > hv_vm_protect(dirty_page_start, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, > > > > > > Fixes: 9c2ff9cdc9b ("exec/cpu-all: remove exec/target_page include") > > > Reported-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> > > > Reported-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > > > Message-Id: <20250425174310.70890-1-philmd@linaro.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> > > > > FYI Paolo merged a patch from me that does the same thing. My patch is > > already in the master branch. > > Paolo said he'd replace your patch by this older one which mentions > the problematic commit, which is why I didn't notice your patch, > I was expecting this one to disappear on rebase. I don't plan to > repost this PR except if there is a serious problem with it. In > this case, we can still revert if we are picky. Duplicated includes > aren't a problem, missing ones are. > Sure. > BTW since you are testing / using HVF on x86, do you know if your > employer could help extending our CI infrastructure coverage for > your use cases? > No, we don't have a use case for HVF. I only tested it because I wanted to refactor the instruction emulator out of the HVF code base. Thanks, Wei. > Regards, > > Phil.
diff --git a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c index 99e37a33e50..b16fb066758 100644 --- a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c +++ b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ #include "qemu/error-report.h" #include "qemu/memalign.h" #include "qapi/error.h" +#include "exec/target_page.h" #include "migration/blocker.h" #include "system/hvf.h"