| Message ID | 1480947224-26222-1-git-send-email-abailon@baylibre.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
On Monday 05 December 2016 07:43 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote: > Everytime the usb20 phy is enabled, there is a > "sleeping function called from invalid context" BUG. > > clk_enable() from arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c uses spin_lock_irqsave() > before to invoke the callback usb20_phy_clk_enable(). > usb20_phy_clk_enable() uses clk_get() and clk_enable_prepapre() > which may sleep. > Move clk_get() to da8xx_register_usb20_phy_clk() and > replace clk_prepare_enable() by clk_enable(). > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com> This will still cause the recursive locking problem reported by David. Not sure what the point of sending this version was. Thanks, Sekhar _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On 12/06/2016 10:33 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Monday 05 December 2016 07:43 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote: >> Everytime the usb20 phy is enabled, there is a >> "sleeping function called from invalid context" BUG. >> >> clk_enable() from arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c uses spin_lock_irqsave() >> before to invoke the callback usb20_phy_clk_enable(). >> usb20_phy_clk_enable() uses clk_get() and clk_enable_prepapre() >> which may sleep. >> Move clk_get() to da8xx_register_usb20_phy_clk() and >> replace clk_prepare_enable() by clk_enable(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com> > > This will still cause the recursive locking problem reported by David. > Not sure what the point of sending this version was. > > Thanks, > Sekhar > What am I supposed to do ? Thanks, Alexandre _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Tuesday 06 December 2016 03:21 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote: > On 12/06/2016 10:33 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Monday 05 December 2016 07:43 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote: >>> Everytime the usb20 phy is enabled, there is a >>> "sleeping function called from invalid context" BUG. >>> >>> clk_enable() from arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c uses spin_lock_irqsave() >>> before to invoke the callback usb20_phy_clk_enable(). >>> usb20_phy_clk_enable() uses clk_get() and clk_enable_prepapre() >>> which may sleep. >>> Move clk_get() to da8xx_register_usb20_phy_clk() and >>> replace clk_prepare_enable() by clk_enable(). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com> >> >> This will still cause the recursive locking problem reported by David. >> Not sure what the point of sending this version was. >> >> Thanks, >> Sekhar >> > What am I supposed to do ? That needs to be resolved between you and David. Perhaps convert the fix sent by David into a proper patch and base this patch on that. Or wait for David to send it himself and let him also make the modifications needed in this patch. David ? Thanks, Sekhar _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On 12/06/2016 03:57 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Tuesday 06 December 2016 03:21 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote: >> On 12/06/2016 10:33 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>> On Monday 05 December 2016 07:43 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote: >>>> Everytime the usb20 phy is enabled, there is a >>>> "sleeping function called from invalid context" BUG. >>>> >>>> clk_enable() from arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c uses spin_lock_irqsave() >>>> before to invoke the callback usb20_phy_clk_enable(). >>>> usb20_phy_clk_enable() uses clk_get() and clk_enable_prepapre() >>>> which may sleep. >>>> Move clk_get() to da8xx_register_usb20_phy_clk() and >>>> replace clk_prepare_enable() by clk_enable(). >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com> >>> >>> This will still cause the recursive locking problem reported by David. >>> Not sure what the point of sending this version was. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sekhar >>> > >> What am I supposed to do ? > > That needs to be resolved between you and David. Perhaps convert the fix > sent by David into a proper patch and base this patch on that. Or wait > for David to send it himself and let him also make the modifications > needed in this patch. > > David ? > > Thanks, > Sekhar > Alexandre, I was hoping that you would just squash my patch with your patch and take Sekhar's suggestion about a separate patch to make the private __clk_enable() public as davinci_clk_enable() when you re-submit. You can add "Suggested-By: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>" to the commit message if you would like to give me some credit for my ideas. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On 12/06/2016 07:56 PM, David Lechner wrote: > On 12/06/2016 03:57 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Tuesday 06 December 2016 03:21 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote: >>> On 12/06/2016 10:33 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>>> On Monday 05 December 2016 07:43 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote: >>>>> Everytime the usb20 phy is enabled, there is a >>>>> "sleeping function called from invalid context" BUG. >>>>> >>>>> clk_enable() from arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c uses >>>>> spin_lock_irqsave() >>>>> before to invoke the callback usb20_phy_clk_enable(). >>>>> usb20_phy_clk_enable() uses clk_get() and clk_enable_prepapre() >>>>> which may sleep. >>>>> Move clk_get() to da8xx_register_usb20_phy_clk() and >>>>> replace clk_prepare_enable() by clk_enable(). >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com> >>>> >>>> This will still cause the recursive locking problem reported by David. >>>> Not sure what the point of sending this version was. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sekhar >>>> >> >>> What am I supposed to do ? >> >> That needs to be resolved between you and David. Perhaps convert the fix >> sent by David into a proper patch and base this patch on that. Or wait >> for David to send it himself and let him also make the modifications >> needed in this patch. >> >> David ? >> >> Thanks, >> Sekhar >> > > Alexandre, I was hoping that you would just squash my patch with your > patch and take Sekhar's suggestion about a separate patch to make the > private __clk_enable() public as davinci_clk_enable() when you re-submit. OK. > > You can add "Suggested-By: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>" to the > commit message if you would like to give me some credit for my ideas. That was my concern. I will do that. Thanks, Alexandre _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c index b010e5f..f62f9c2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ #define DA8XX_USB0_BASE 0x01e00000 #define DA8XX_USB1_BASE 0x01e25000 +static struct clk *usb20_clk; + static struct platform_device da8xx_usb_phy = { .name = "da8xx-usb-phy", .id = -1, @@ -158,24 +160,16 @@ int __init da8xx_register_usb_refclkin(int rate) static void usb20_phy_clk_enable(struct clk *clk) { - struct clk *usb20_clk; int err; u32 val; u32 timeout = 500000; /* 500 msec */ val = readl(DA8XX_SYSCFG0_VIRT(DA8XX_CFGCHIP2_REG)); - usb20_clk = clk_get(&da8xx_usb20_dev.dev, "usb20"); - if (IS_ERR(usb20_clk)) { - pr_err("could not get usb20 clk: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(usb20_clk)); - return; - } - /* The USB 2.O PLL requires that the USB 2.O PSC is enabled as well. */ - err = clk_prepare_enable(usb20_clk); + err = clk_enable(usb20_clk); if (err) { pr_err("failed to enable usb20 clk: %d\n", err); - clk_put(usb20_clk); return; } @@ -197,8 +191,7 @@ static void usb20_phy_clk_enable(struct clk *clk) pr_err("Timeout waiting for USB 2.0 PHY clock good\n"); done: - clk_disable_unprepare(usb20_clk); - clk_put(usb20_clk); + clk_disable(usb20_clk); } static void usb20_phy_clk_disable(struct clk *clk) @@ -285,11 +278,19 @@ static struct clk_lookup usb20_phy_clk_lookup = int __init da8xx_register_usb20_phy_clk(bool use_usb_refclkin) { struct clk *parent; - int ret = 0; + int ret; + + usb20_clk = clk_get(&da8xx_usb20_dev.dev, "usb20"); + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(usb20_clk); + if (ret) + return ret; parent = clk_get(NULL, use_usb_refclkin ? "usb_refclkin" : "pll0_aux"); - if (IS_ERR(parent)) - return PTR_ERR(parent); + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(parent); + if (ret) { + clk_put(usb20_clk); + return ret; + } usb20_phy_clk.parent = parent; ret = clk_register(&usb20_phy_clk);
Everytime the usb20 phy is enabled, there is a "sleeping function called from invalid context" BUG. clk_enable() from arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c uses spin_lock_irqsave() before to invoke the callback usb20_phy_clk_enable(). usb20_phy_clk_enable() uses clk_get() and clk_enable_prepapre() which may sleep. Move clk_get() to da8xx_register_usb20_phy_clk() and replace clk_prepare_enable() by clk_enable(). Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com> --- arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb-da8xx.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- 2.7.3 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel