diff mbox series

Revert "mfd: axp20x: Allow multiple regulators"

Message ID 20241231165103.800752-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
State New
Headers show
Series Revert "mfd: axp20x: Allow multiple regulators" | expand

Commit Message

Andre Przywara Dec. 31, 2024, 4:51 p.m. UTC
As Chris and Vasily reported, the attempt to support multiple AXP PMICs
in one system [1] breaks some of the battery and charging functionality
on devices with AXP PMICs. The reason is that the drivers now fail to get
the correct IIO channel for the ADC component, as the current code seems
to rely on the zero-based enumeration of the regulator devices.
A fix is possible, but not trivial, as it requires some rework in the AXP
MFD driver, which cannot be fully reviewed or tested in time for the
6.13 release.

So revert this patch for now, to avoid regressions on battery powered
devices. This patch was really only necessary for devices with two
PMICs, support for which is not mainline yet anyway, so we don't lose
any functionality.

This reverts commit e37ec32188701efa01455b9be42a392adab06ce4.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20241007001408.27249-4-andre.przywara@arm.com/

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Vasily Khoruzhick Dec. 31, 2024, 7:31 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 8:51 AM Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>
> As Chris and Vasily reported, the attempt to support multiple AXP PMICs
> in one system [1] breaks some of the battery and charging functionality
> on devices with AXP PMICs. The reason is that the drivers now fail to get
> the correct IIO channel for the ADC component, as the current code seems
> to rely on the zero-based enumeration of the regulator devices.
> A fix is possible, but not trivial, as it requires some rework in the AXP
> MFD driver, which cannot be fully reviewed or tested in time for the
> 6.13 release.
>
> So revert this patch for now, to avoid regressions on battery powered
> devices. This patch was really only necessary for devices with two
> PMICs, support for which is not mainline yet anyway, so we don't lose
> any functionality.
>
> This reverts commit e37ec32188701efa01455b9be42a392adab06ce4.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20241007001408.27249-4-andre.przywara@arm.com/

Doesn't it need a Fixes tag?

Tested-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>

> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> index 251465a656d09..5b8e88341a305 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> @@ -1445,7 +1445,7 @@ int axp20x_device_probe(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       ret = mfd_add_devices(axp20x->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, axp20x->cells,
> +       ret = mfd_add_devices(axp20x->dev, -1, axp20x->cells,
>                               axp20x->nr_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
>
>         if (ret) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
index 251465a656d09..5b8e88341a305 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
@@ -1445,7 +1445,7 @@  int axp20x_device_probe(struct axp20x_dev *axp20x)
 		}
 	}
 
-	ret = mfd_add_devices(axp20x->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, axp20x->cells,
+	ret = mfd_add_devices(axp20x->dev, -1, axp20x->cells,
 			      axp20x->nr_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
 
 	if (ret) {