| Message ID | 20241216201148.535115-4-briannorris@chromium.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drivers: base: Don't match device with NULL of_node/fwnode/etc + tests | expand |
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:12, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote: > > We recently updated these device_match*() (and therefore, various > *find_device_by*()) functions to return a consistent 'false' value when > trying to match a NULL handle. Add tests for this. > > This provides regression-testing coverage for the sorts of bugs that > underly commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device > only if one actually exists"). > > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> > --- > Thanks. This looks good to me. Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> -- David > Changes in v3: > * Fix potential leak in test error case > * Add Maxime's Reviewed-by > > Changes in v2: > * Keep "devm" and "match" tests in separate suites > > drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c > index ea05b8785743..6355a2231b74 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c > +++ b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c > @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@ > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +#include <kunit/platform_device.h> > #include <kunit/resource.h> > > #include <linux/device.h> > +#include <linux/device/bus.h> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > #define DEVICE_NAME "test" > @@ -217,7 +220,43 @@ static struct kunit_suite platform_device_devm_test_suite = { > .test_cases = platform_device_devm_tests, > }; > > -kunit_test_suite(platform_device_devm_test_suite); > +static void platform_device_find_by_null_test(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct platform_device *pdev; > + int ret; > + > + pdev = kunit_platform_device_alloc(test, DEVICE_NAME, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev); > + > + ret = kunit_platform_device_add(test, pdev); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > + > + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, of_find_device_by_node(NULL), NULL); > + > + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_of_node(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_fwnode(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_acpi_dev(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL); > + > + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_of_node(&pdev->dev, NULL)); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_fwnode(&pdev->dev, NULL)); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_acpi_dev(&pdev->dev, NULL)); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_acpi_handle(&pdev->dev, NULL)); > +} > + > +static struct kunit_case platform_device_match_tests[] = { > + KUNIT_CASE(platform_device_find_by_null_test), > + {} > +}; > + > +static struct kunit_suite platform_device_match_test_suite = { > + .name = "platform-device-match", > + .test_cases = platform_device_match_tests, > +}; > + > +kunit_test_suites( > + &platform_device_devm_test_suite, > + &platform_device_match_test_suite, > +); > > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test module for platform devices"); > MODULE_AUTHOR("Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>"); > -- > 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog >
On 12/18/24 22:45, David Gow wrote: > On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:12, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> We recently updated these device_match*() (and therefore, various >> *find_device_by*()) functions to return a consistent 'false' value when >> trying to match a NULL handle. Add tests for this. >> >> This provides regression-testing coverage for the sorts of bugs that >> underly commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device >> only if one actually exists"). >> >> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> >> --- >> > > Thanks. This looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > > > This one also can go through Greg's drivers tree: Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c index ea05b8785743..6355a2231b74 100644 --- a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c +++ b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include <kunit/platform_device.h> #include <kunit/resource.h> #include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/device/bus.h> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #define DEVICE_NAME "test" @@ -217,7 +220,43 @@ static struct kunit_suite platform_device_devm_test_suite = { .test_cases = platform_device_devm_tests, }; -kunit_test_suite(platform_device_devm_test_suite); +static void platform_device_find_by_null_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct platform_device *pdev; + int ret; + + pdev = kunit_platform_device_alloc(test, DEVICE_NAME, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev); + + ret = kunit_platform_device_add(test, pdev); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, of_find_device_by_node(NULL), NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_of_node(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_fwnode(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_acpi_dev(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_of_node(&pdev->dev, NULL)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_fwnode(&pdev->dev, NULL)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_acpi_dev(&pdev->dev, NULL)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_acpi_handle(&pdev->dev, NULL)); +} + +static struct kunit_case platform_device_match_tests[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(platform_device_find_by_null_test), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite platform_device_match_test_suite = { + .name = "platform-device-match", + .test_cases = platform_device_match_tests, +}; + +kunit_test_suites( + &platform_device_devm_test_suite, + &platform_device_match_test_suite, +); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test module for platform devices"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>");
We recently updated these device_match*() (and therefore, various *find_device_by*()) functions to return a consistent 'false' value when trying to match a NULL handle. Add tests for this. This provides regression-testing coverage for the sorts of bugs that underly commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device only if one actually exists"). Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> --- Changes in v3: * Fix potential leak in test error case * Add Maxime's Reviewed-by Changes in v2: * Keep "devm" and "match" tests in separate suites drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)