diff mbox series

usb: gadget: m66592-udc: Add check for clk_enable()

Message ID 20241215205358.4100142-1-zmw12306@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series usb: gadget: m66592-udc: Add check for clk_enable() | expand

Commit Message

Mingwei Zheng Dec. 15, 2024, 8:53 p.m. UTC
Add check for the return value of clk_enable() to catch the potential
error.

Fixes: b4822e2317e8 ("usb: gadget: m66592-udc: Convert to use module_platform_driver()")
Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zheng <zmw12306@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Mingwei Zheng Dec. 18, 2024, 3:06 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Greg,

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 2:56 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 03:53:58PM -0500, Mingwei Zheng wrote:
> > Add check for the return value of clk_enable() to catch the potential
> > error.
> >
> > Fixes: b4822e2317e8 ("usb: gadget: m66592-udc: Convert to use module_platform_driver()")
> > Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zheng <zmw12306@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>
>
> Why this order of signed-off-by lines?  Shouldn't yours be last?  Who
> wrote this patch?
>

I listed two names because both of us co-authored this patch.

> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c | 6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c
> > index a938b2af0944..bf408476a24c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c
> > @@ -1606,7 +1606,11 @@ static int m66592_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >                       ret = PTR_ERR(m66592->clk);
> >                       goto clean_up2;
> >               }
> > -             clk_enable(m66592->clk);
> > +             ret = clk_enable(m66592->clk);
> > +             if (ret) {
> > +                     clk_put(m66592->clk);
> > +                     goto clean_up2;
> > +             }
>
> How did you find this and how was it tested?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

We found it through a static analysis tool. Additionally, we validated
the patch's correctness
using the built-in tests provided during the compilation process.
Please kindly let me know if you need further details or have any
questions. Thank you!

Best,
Mingwei
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c
index a938b2af0944..bf408476a24c 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/m66592-udc.c
@@ -1606,7 +1606,11 @@  static int m66592_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			ret = PTR_ERR(m66592->clk);
 			goto clean_up2;
 		}
-		clk_enable(m66592->clk);
+		ret = clk_enable(m66592->clk);
+		if (ret) {
+			clk_put(m66592->clk);
+			goto clean_up2;
+		}
 	}
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&m66592->gadget.ep_list);