Message ID | 20241112142248.20503-7-frederic@kernel.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c b/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c index c5aec26019d6..4b2a9cd811c4 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c @@ -1960,13 +1960,11 @@ static int qedi_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu) struct qedi_percpu_s *p = this_cpu_ptr(&qedi_percpu); struct task_struct *thread; - thread = kthread_create_on_node(qedi_percpu_io_thread, (void *)p, - cpu_to_node(cpu), - "qedi_thread/%d", cpu); + thread = kthread_create_on_cpu(qedi_percpu_io_thread, (void *)p, + cpu, "qedi_thread/%d"); if (IS_ERR(thread)) return PTR_ERR(thread); - kthread_bind(thread, cpu); p->iothread = thread; wake_up_process(thread); return 0;
Use the proper API instead of open coding it. However it looks like qedi_percpu_io_thread() kthread could be replaced by the use of a high prio workqueue instead. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> --- drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)