@@ -721,6 +721,33 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port(struct device_node *parent,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_next_port);
+/**
+ * of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint() - get next endpoint node in port.
+ * If it reached to end of the port, it will return NULL.
+ * @port: pointer to the target port node
+ * @prev: previous endpoint node, or NULL to get first
+ *
+ * Return: An 'endpoint' node pointer with refcount incremented. Refcount
+ * of the passed @prev node is decremented.
+ */
+struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(const struct device_node *port,
+ struct device_node *prev)
+{
+ while (1) {
+ prev = of_get_next_child(port, prev);
+ if (!prev)
+ break;
+ if (WARN(!of_node_name_eq(prev, "endpoint"),
+ "non endpoint node is used (%pOF)", prev))
+ continue;
+
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return prev;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint);
+
/**
* of_graph_get_next_endpoint() - get next endpoint node
* @parent: pointer to the parent device node
@@ -62,6 +62,18 @@ struct of_endpoint {
for (struct device_node *child __free(device_node) = of_graph_get_next_port(parent, NULL);\
child != NULL; child = of_graph_get_next_port(parent, child))
+/**
+ * for_each_of_graph_port_endpoint - iterate over every endpoint in a port node
+ * @parent: parent port node
+ * @child: loop variable pointing to the current endpoint node
+ *
+ * When breaking out of the loop, and continue to use the @child, you need to
+ * use return_ptr(@child) or no_free_ptr(@child) not to call __free() for it.
+ */
+#define for_each_of_graph_port_endpoint(parent, child) \
+ for (struct device_node *child __free(device_node) = of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(parent, NULL);\
+ child != NULL; child = of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(parent, child))
+
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node);
int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
@@ -76,6 +88,8 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_ports(struct device_node *parent,
struct device_node *ports);
struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port(struct device_node *parent,
struct device_node *port);
+struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(const struct device_node *port,
+ struct device_node *prev);
struct device_node *of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(
const struct device_node *parent, int port_reg, int reg);
struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(
@@ -136,6 +150,13 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port(
return NULL;
}
+static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(
+ const struct device_node *parent,
+ struct device_node *previous)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(
const struct device_node *parent, int port_reg, int reg)
{
We already have of_graph_get_next_endpoint(), but it is not intuitive to use in some case. (X) node { (Y) ports { (P0) port@0 { endpoint { remote-endpoint = ...; };}; (P10) port@1 { endpoint { remote-endpoint = ...; }; (P11) endpoint { remote-endpoint = ...; };}; (P2) port@2 { endpoint { remote-endpoint = ...; };}; }; }; For example, if I want to handle port@1's 2 endpoints (= P10, P11), I want to use like below P10 = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, NULL); P11 = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, P10); But 1st one will be error, because of_graph_get_next_endpoint() requested 1st parameter is "node" (X) or "ports" (Y), not but "port". Below works well, but it will get P0 P0 = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(node, NULL); P0 = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(ports, NULL); In other words, we can't handle P10/P11 directly via of_graph_get_next_endpoint(). There is another non intuitive behavior on of_graph_get_next_endpoint(). In case of if I could get P10 pointer for some way, and if I want to handle port@1 things by loop, I would like use it like below /* * "ep" is now P10, and handle port1 things here, * but we don't know how many endpoints port1 have. * * Because "ep" is non NULL now, we can use port1 * as of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, xxx) */ do { /* do something for port1 specific things here */ } while (ep = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, ep)) But it also not worked as I expected. I expect it will be P10 -> P11 -> NULL, but it will be P10 -> P11 -> P2, because of_graph_get_next_endpoint() will fetch "endpoint" beyond the "port". It is not useful for generic driver. To handle endpoint more intuitive, create of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint() of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(port1, NULL); // P10 of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(port1, P10); // P11 of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(port1, P11); // NULL Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> --- drivers/of/property.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/of_graph.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)