| Message ID | 20240909054318.1809580-11-almasrymina@google.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Device Memory TCP | expand |
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 05:43:15 +0000 Mina Almasry wrote: > --- a/include/uapi/linux/uio.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/uio.h > @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ struct dmabuf_cmsg { > */ > }; > > +struct dmabuf_token { > + __u32 token_start; > + __u32 token_count; > +}; > /* nit: missing new line
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:05:38PM -0700, Mina Almasry wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 4:17 AM Lai, Yi <yi1.lai@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Mina Almasry, > > > > Greetings! > > > > I used Syzkaller and found that there is BUG: soft lockup inqt in linux-next tree next-20241008 > > > > After bisection and the first bad commit is: > > " > > 678f6e28b5f6 net: add SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED setsockopt to release RX frags > > " > > > > All detailed into can be found at: > > https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/241009_103423_do_sock_setsockopt > > Syzkaller repro code: > > https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/241009_103423_do_sock_setsockopt/repro.c > > Syzkaller repro syscall steps: > > https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/241009_103423_do_sock_setsockopt/repro.prog > > Syzkaller report: > > https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/241009_103423_do_sock_setsockopt/repro.report > > Kconfig(make olddefconfig): > > https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/241009_103423_do_sock_setsockopt/kconfig_origin > > Bisect info: > > https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/tree/main/241009_103423_do_sock_setsockopt/bisect_info.log > > bzImage: > > https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/raw/refs/heads/main/241009_103423_do_sock_setsockopt/bzImage_8cf0b93919e13d1e8d4466eb4080a4c4d9d66d7b > > Issue dmesg: > > https://github.com/laifryiee/syzkaller_logs/blob/main/241009_103423_do_sock_setsockopt/8cf0b93919e13d1e8d4466eb4080a4c4d9d66d7b_dmesg.log > > > > " > > [ 48.825073] ? __lock_acquire+0x1b0f/0x5c90 > > [ 48.825419] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.825774] sock_setsockopt+0x68/0x90 > > [ 48.826117] do_sock_setsockopt+0x3fb/0x480 > > [ 48.826455] ? __pfx_do_sock_setsockopt+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.826829] ? lock_release+0x441/0x870 > > [ 48.827140] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 > > [ 48.827558] ? fdget+0x188/0x230 > > [ 48.827846] __sys_setsockopt+0x131/0x200 > > [ 48.828184] ? __pfx___sys_setsockopt+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.828551] ? seqcount_lockdep_reader_access.constprop.0+0xc0/0xd0 > > [ 48.829042] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 > > [ 48.829425] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xbf/0xf0 > > [ 48.829817] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xc6/0x160 > > [ 48.830160] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x14a/0x230 > > [ 48.830520] x64_sys_call+0x6cf/0x20d0 > > [ 48.830825] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 > > [ 48.831124] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e > > [ 48.831517] RIP: 0033:0x7f26cdc3ee5d > > [ 48.831804] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 93 af 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > > [ 48.833180] RSP: 002b:00007fff33f36278 EFLAGS: 00000213 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036 > > [ 48.833756] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f26cdc3ee5d > > [ 48.834294] RDX: 0000000000000050 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000003 > > [ 48.834830] RBP: 00007fff33f36290 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 00007fff33f36290 > > [ 48.835368] R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000213 R12: 00007fff33f363e8 > > [ 48.835906] R13: 000000000040178f R14: 0000000000403e08 R15: 00007f26cde51000 > > [ 48.836466] </TASK> > > [ 48.836648] Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks > > [ 48.837096] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 729 Comm: repro Tainted: G L 6.12.0-rc2-8cf0b93919e1 #1 > > [ 48.837796] Tainted: [L]=SOFTLOCKUP > > [ 48.838071] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 > > [ 48.838916] Call Trace: > > [ 48.839113] <IRQ> > > [ 48.839282] dump_stack_lvl+0x42/0x150 > > [ 48.839584] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 > > [ 48.839846] panic+0x703/0x790 > > [ 48.840100] ? __pfx_panic+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.840394] ? watchdog_timer_fn+0x599/0x6b0 > > [ 48.840727] ? watchdog_timer_fn+0x58c/0x6b0 > > [ 48.841065] watchdog_timer_fn+0x5aa/0x6b0 > > [ 48.841382] ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.841743] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x5d6/0xc30 > > [ 48.842091] ? __pfx___hrtimer_run_queues+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.842473] hrtimer_interrupt+0x324/0x7a0 > > [ 48.842802] __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x10b/0x410 > > [ 48.843198] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x20/0x30 > > [ 48.843551] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xaf/0xd0 > > [ 48.843922] </IRQ> > > [ 48.844101] <TASK> > > [ 48.844275] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1f/0x30 > > [ 48.844711] RIP: 0010:__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x45/0x70 > > [ 48.845130] Code: a9 00 01 ff 00 74 1d f6 c4 01 74 43 a9 00 00 0f 00 75 3c a9 00 00 f0 00 75 35 8b 82 04 1e 00 00 85 c0 74 2b 8b 82 e0 1d 00 00 <83> f8 02 75 20 48 8b 8a e8 1d 00 00 8b 92 e4 1d 00 00 48 8b 01 48 > > [ 48.846480] RSP: 0018:ffff8880239cf790 EFLAGS: 00000246 > > [ 48.846876] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880239cf900 RCX: ffffffff8581c19f > > [ 48.847407] RDX: ffff88801a818000 RSI: ffffffff8581c1d5 RDI: 0000000000000007 > > [ 48.847933] RBP: ffff8880239cf790 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed1004739f23 > > [ 48.848472] R10: 0000000077cc006e R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 > > [ 48.849002] R13: 0000000077cc006e R14: ffff8880239cf918 R15: 0000000000000000 > > [ 48.849536] ? xas_start+0x11f/0x730 > > [ 48.849818] ? xas_start+0x155/0x730 > > [ 48.850101] xas_start+0x155/0x730 > > [ 48.850372] xas_load+0x2f/0x520 > > [ 48.850629] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 > > [ 48.850922] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0xd0 > > [ 48.851304] xas_store+0x1165/0x1ad0 > > [ 48.851588] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 > > [ 48.851950] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 > > [ 48.852254] __xa_erase+0xc6/0x180 > > [ 48.852524] ? __pfx___xa_erase+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.852842] ? __xa_erase+0xf1/0x180 > > [ 48.853123] ? sock_devmem_dontneed+0x42c/0x6d0 > > [ 48.853480] sock_devmem_dontneed+0x3a8/0x6d0 > > [ 48.853829] ? __pfx_sock_devmem_dontneed+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.854205] ? trace_lock_acquire+0x139/0x1b0 > > [ 48.854548] ? lock_acquire+0x80/0xb0 > > [ 48.854833] ? __might_fault+0xf1/0x1b0 > > [ 48.855133] ? __might_fault+0xf1/0x1b0 > > [ 48.855437] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 > > [ 48.855849] sk_setsockopt+0x480/0x3c60 > > [ 48.856158] ? __pfx_sk_setsockopt+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.856491] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 > > [ 48.856814] ? __lock_acquire+0x1b0f/0x5c90 > > [ 48.857144] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.857488] sock_setsockopt+0x68/0x90 > > [ 48.857785] do_sock_setsockopt+0x3fb/0x480 > > [ 48.858110] ? __pfx_do_sock_setsockopt+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.858474] ? lock_release+0x441/0x870 > > [ 48.858776] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 > > [ 48.859184] ? fdget+0x188/0x230 > > [ 48.859448] __sys_setsockopt+0x131/0x200 > > [ 48.859764] ? __pfx___sys_setsockopt+0x10/0x10 > > [ 48.860123] ? seqcount_lockdep_reader_access.constprop.0+0xc0/0xd0 > > [ 48.860598] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 > > [ 48.860982] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xbf/0xf0 > > [ 48.861370] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xc6/0x160 > > [ 48.861710] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x14a/0x230 > > [ 48.862057] x64_sys_call+0x6cf/0x20d0 > > [ 48.862350] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 > > [ 48.862639] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e > > [ 48.863023] RIP: 0033:0x7f26cdc3ee5d > > [ 48.863301] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 93 af 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > > [ 48.864659] RSP: 002b:00007fff33f36278 EFLAGS: 00000213 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036 > > [ 48.865223] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f26cdc3ee5d > > " > > > > I hope you find it useful. > > Thank you for the report. I think I see the issue and I commented on > the fix in the code below. > > Only issue is that this is unlucky timing for me. I have a flight > tomorrow for a vacation where I think I may have internet access and > may not. I will try to follow up here, but in case I can't, what's the > urgency for this issue? Can this wait 2 weeks when I get back? > > > > + if (optlen % sizeof(struct dmabuf_token) || > > > + optlen > sizeof(*tokens) * MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + tokens = kvmalloc_array(optlen, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (!tokens) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + > > There is an unrelated bug here. The first argument for kvmalloc_array > is the number of elements, I think, not the number of bytes. So this > should be: > > num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(struct dmabuf_token); > tokens = kvmalloc_array(num_tokens, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!tokens) > return -ENOMEM; > > > > + > > > + if (copy_from_sockptr(tokens, optval, optlen)) { > > > + kvfree(tokens); > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > + } > > > + > > > + xa_lock_bh(&sk->sk_user_frags); > > > + for (i = 0; i < num_tokens; i++) { > > > + for (j = 0; j < tokens[i].token_count; j++) { > > The bug should be here. tokens[i].token_count is a u32 provided by the > user. The user can specify U32_MAX here, which will make the loop > below spin for a very long time with the lock held, which should be > the cause of the soft lockup. > > We should add a check that token_count is < MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS or > something like that, above this line. > > Please let me know of urgency. If this can't wait I'll try very hard > to repro the issue/fix while I'm out. Untested fix I'm going to try > out: > Hi Mina This bug can wait as you mentioned two weeks. Just let you know, after applied your proposed fix, the issue cannot be reproduced using the same repro binary. If you have a formal fix patch later, I would be happy to test it again. Just let me know. Regards, Yi Lai > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > index 083d438d8b6f..cb3d8b19de14 100644 > --- a/net/core/sock.c > +++ b/net/core/sock.c > @@ -1071,11 +1071,11 @@ sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, > sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen) > optlen > sizeof(*tokens) * MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS) > return -EINVAL; > > - tokens = kvmalloc_array(optlen, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL); > + num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(struct dmabuf_token); > + tokens = kvmalloc_array(num_tokens, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!tokens) > return -ENOMEM; > > - num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(struct dmabuf_token); > if (copy_from_sockptr(tokens, optval, optlen)) { > kvfree(tokens); > return -EFAULT; > @@ -1083,6 +1083,10 @@ sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t > optval, unsigned int optlen) > > xa_lock_bh(&sk->sk_user_frags); > for (i = 0; i < num_tokens; i++) { > + > + if (tokens[i].token_count > MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS) > + continue; > + > for (j = 0; j < tokens[i].token_count; j++) { > netmem_ref netmem = (__force netmem_ref)__xa_erase( > &sk->sk_user_frags, tokens[i].token_start + j); > > -- > Thanks, > Mina
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:05:38 -0700 Mina Almasry wrote: > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > index 083d438d8b6f..cb3d8b19de14 100644 > --- a/net/core/sock.c > +++ b/net/core/sock.c > @@ -1071,11 +1071,11 @@ sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, > sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen) > optlen > sizeof(*tokens) * MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS) > return -EINVAL; > > - tokens = kvmalloc_array(optlen, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL); > + num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(struct dmabuf_token); > + tokens = kvmalloc_array(num_tokens, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!tokens) > return -ENOMEM; > > - num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(struct dmabuf_token); > if (copy_from_sockptr(tokens, optval, optlen)) { > kvfree(tokens); > return -EFAULT; > @@ -1083,6 +1083,10 @@ sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t > optval, unsigned int optlen) > > xa_lock_bh(&sk->sk_user_frags); > for (i = 0; i < num_tokens; i++) { > + > + if (tokens[i].token_count > MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS) > + continue; For the real fix let's scan the tokens before we take the xa lock and return an error rather than silently skipping? > for (j = 0; j < tokens[i].token_count; j++) {
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:27 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:05:38 -0700 Mina Almasry wrote: > > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > > index 083d438d8b6f..cb3d8b19de14 100644 > > --- a/net/core/sock.c > > +++ b/net/core/sock.c > > @@ -1071,11 +1071,11 @@ sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, > > sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen) > > optlen > sizeof(*tokens) * MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - tokens = kvmalloc_array(optlen, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL); > > + num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(struct dmabuf_token); > > + tokens = kvmalloc_array(num_tokens, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!tokens) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > - num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(struct dmabuf_token); > > if (copy_from_sockptr(tokens, optval, optlen)) { > > kvfree(tokens); > > return -EFAULT; > > @@ -1083,6 +1083,10 @@ sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t > > optval, unsigned int optlen) > > > > xa_lock_bh(&sk->sk_user_frags); > > for (i = 0; i < num_tokens; i++) { > > + > > + if (tokens[i].token_count > MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS) > > + continue; > > For the real fix let's scan the tokens before we take the xa lock > and return an error rather than silently skipping? > > > for (j = 0; j < tokens[i].token_count; j++) { > Yes, sorry, I called the diff above an 'untested fix' but it was more of a hack to see if I got the root cause right. For a proper fix, we should do exactly that. Scan and see how many tokens the user is asking us to free ahead of time, then exit early if it's too much before we acquire locks and loop. Will do!
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h index ef4656a41058..251b73c5481e 100644 --- a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h +++ b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ #define SCM_DEVMEM_LINEAR SO_DEVMEM_LINEAR #define SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF 79 #define SCM_DEVMEM_DMABUF SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF +#define SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED 80 #if !defined(__KERNEL__) diff --git a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h index 414807d55e33..8ab7582291ab 100644 --- a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h +++ b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ #define SCM_DEVMEM_LINEAR SO_DEVMEM_LINEAR #define SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF 79 #define SCM_DEVMEM_DMABUF SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF +#define SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED 80 #if !defined(__KERNEL__) diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h index 2b817efd4544..38fc0b188e08 100644 --- a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h +++ b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ #define SCM_DEVMEM_LINEAR SO_DEVMEM_LINEAR #define SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF 79 #define SCM_DEVMEM_DMABUF SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF +#define SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED 80 #if !defined(__KERNEL__) diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h index 00248fc68977..57084ed2f3c4 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ #define SCM_DEVMEM_LINEAR SO_DEVMEM_LINEAR #define SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF 0x0058 #define SCM_DEVMEM_DMABUF SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF +#define SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED 0x0059 #if !defined(__KERNEL__) diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h index e993edc9c0ee..3b4e3e815602 100644 --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ #define SCM_DEVMEM_LINEAR SO_DEVMEM_LINEAR #define SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF 79 #define SCM_DEVMEM_DMABUF SO_DEVMEM_DMABUF +#define SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED 80 #if !defined(__KERNEL__) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/uio.h b/include/uapi/linux/uio.h index 3a22ddae376a..d17f8fcd93ec 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/uio.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/uio.h @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ struct dmabuf_cmsg { */ }; +struct dmabuf_token { + __u32 token_start; + __u32 token_count; +}; /* * UIO_MAXIOV shall be at least 16 1003.1g (5.4.1.1) */ diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 468b1239606c..bbb57b5af0b1 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ #include <linux/netdevice.h> #include <net/protocol.h> #include <linux/skbuff.h> +#include <linux/skbuff_ref.h> #include <net/net_namespace.h> #include <net/request_sock.h> #include <net/sock.h> @@ -1049,6 +1050,69 @@ static int sock_reserve_memory(struct sock *sk, int bytes) return 0; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL + +/* This is the number of tokens that the user can SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED in + * 1 syscall. The limit exists to limit the amount of memory the kernel + * allocates to copy these tokens. + */ +#define MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS 128 + +static noinline_for_stack int +sock_devmem_dontneed(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen) +{ + unsigned int num_tokens, i, j, k, netmem_num = 0; + struct dmabuf_token *tokens; + netmem_ref netmems[16]; + int ret = 0; + + if (!sk_is_tcp(sk)) + return -EBADF; + + if (optlen % sizeof(struct dmabuf_token) || + optlen > sizeof(*tokens) * MAX_DONTNEED_TOKENS) + return -EINVAL; + + tokens = kvmalloc_array(optlen, sizeof(*tokens), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tokens) + return -ENOMEM; + + num_tokens = optlen / sizeof(struct dmabuf_token); + if (copy_from_sockptr(tokens, optval, optlen)) { + kvfree(tokens); + return -EFAULT; + } + + xa_lock_bh(&sk->sk_user_frags); + for (i = 0; i < num_tokens; i++) { + for (j = 0; j < tokens[i].token_count; j++) { + netmem_ref netmem = (__force netmem_ref)__xa_erase( + &sk->sk_user_frags, tokens[i].token_start + j); + + if (netmem && + !WARN_ON_ONCE(!netmem_is_net_iov(netmem))) { + netmems[netmem_num++] = netmem; + if (netmem_num == ARRAY_SIZE(netmems)) { + xa_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_user_frags); + for (k = 0; k < netmem_num; k++) + WARN_ON_ONCE(!napi_pp_put_page(netmems[k])); + netmem_num = 0; + xa_lock_bh(&sk->sk_user_frags); + } + ret++; + } + } + } + + xa_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_user_frags); + for (k = 0; k < netmem_num; k++) + WARN_ON_ONCE(!napi_pp_put_page(netmems[k])); + + kvfree(tokens); + return ret; +} +#endif + void sockopt_lock_sock(struct sock *sk) { /* When current->bpf_ctx is set, the setsockopt is called from @@ -1211,6 +1275,10 @@ int sk_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; return ret; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL + case SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED: + return sock_devmem_dontneed(sk, optval, optlen); +#endif } sockopt_lock_sock(sk);