diff mbox series

[1/3] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case

Message ID 20240815154529.628087-2-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [1/3] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case | expand

Commit Message

Christoph Schlameuss Aug. 15, 2024, 3:45 p.m. UTC
Add a test case verifying basic running and interaction of ucontrol VMs.
Fill the segment and page tables for allocated memory and map memory on
first access.

* uc_map_unmap
  Store and load data to mapped and unmapped memory and use pic segment
  translation handling to map memory on access.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c       | 120 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Janosch Frank Aug. 23, 2024, 8:02 a.m. UTC | #1
On 8/19/24 6:03 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> On Fri Aug 16, 2024 at 4:29 PM CEST, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> On 8/15/24 5:45 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
>>> Add a test case verifying basic running and interaction of ucontrol VMs.
>>> Fill the segment and page tables for allocated memory and map memory on
>>> first access.
>>>
>>> * uc_map_unmap
>>>     Store and load data to mapped and unmapped memory and use pic segment
>>>     translation handling to map memory on access.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>    .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c       | 120 +++++++++++++++++-
>>>    1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>
>>> +static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
>>> +
>>> +	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
>>> +	switch (run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code) {
>>> +	case PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
>>> +		pr_info("ucontrol pic segment translation 0x%llx\n",
>>> +			run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
>>> +		/* map / make additional memory available */
>>> +		struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map2 = {
>>> +			.user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code),
>>> +			.vcpu_addr = run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code,
>>> +			.length = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
>>> +		};
>>> +		pr_info("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx\n",
>>> +			(void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
>>> +		TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map2));
>>> +		break;
>>
>> Why is this necessary if you fix up the mapping in the test?
>>
> 
> This is also used within the uc_skey test to make sure the remap does
> work after the unmap.

Maybe I'm blind because I'm still recovering but where exactly?
Christoph Schlameuss Aug. 23, 2024, 1:03 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri Aug 23, 2024 at 10:02 AM CEST, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 8/19/24 6:03 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> > On Fri Aug 16, 2024 at 4:29 PM CEST, Janosch Frank wrote:
> >> On 8/15/24 5:45 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> >>> Add a test case verifying basic running and interaction of ucontrol VMs.
> >>> Fill the segment and page tables for allocated memory and map memory on
> >>> first access.
> >>>
> >>> * uc_map_unmap
> >>>     Store and load data to mapped and unmapped memory and use pic segment
> >>>     translation handling to map memory on access.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>    .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c       | 120 +++++++++++++++++-
> >>>    1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >>> +static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
> >>> +
> >>> +	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
> >>> +	switch (run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code) {
> >>> +	case PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
> >>> +		pr_info("ucontrol pic segment translation 0x%llx\n",
> >>> +			run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
> >>> +		/* map / make additional memory available */
> >>> +		struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map2 = {
> >>> +			.user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code),
> >>> +			.vcpu_addr = run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code,
> >>> +			.length = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
> >>> +		};
> >>> +		pr_info("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx\n",
> >>> +			(void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
> >>> +		TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map2));
> >>> +		break;
> >>
> >> Why is this necessary if you fix up the mapping in the test?
> >>
> > 
> > This is also used within the uc_skey test to make sure the remap does
> > work after the unmap.
>
> Maybe I'm blind because I'm still recovering but where exactly?

It is literally used in the last line of the test case. Calling uc_handle_exit()
again re-maps previously unmapped memory.

I can try to make that a little bit more obvious.

+	/* unmap and run loop again */
+	TH_LOG("ucas unmap %p %p 0x%llx",
+	       (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
+	rc = ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP, &map2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
+		TH_LOG("ucas map result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+	ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
+	ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));  // <--- HERE
+}
Janosch Frank Aug. 23, 2024, 1:20 p.m. UTC | #3
On 8/23/24 3:03 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> On Fri Aug 23, 2024 at 10:02 AM CEST, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> On 8/19/24 6:03 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
>>> On Fri Aug 16, 2024 at 4:29 PM CEST, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>>> On 8/15/24 5:45 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
>>>>> Add a test case verifying basic running and interaction of ucontrol VMs.
>>>>> Fill the segment and page tables for allocated memory and map memory on
>>>>> first access.
>>>>>
>>>>> * uc_map_unmap
>>>>>      Store and load data to mapped and unmapped memory and use pic segment
>>>>>      translation handling to map memory on access.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c       | 120 +++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>     1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
>>>>> +	switch (run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code) {
>>>>> +	case PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
>>>>> +		pr_info("ucontrol pic segment translation 0x%llx\n",
>>>>> +			run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
>>>>> +		/* map / make additional memory available */
>>>>> +		struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map2 = {
>>>>> +			.user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code),
>>>>> +			.vcpu_addr = run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code,
>>>>> +			.length = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
>>>>> +		};
>>>>> +		pr_info("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx\n",
>>>>> +			(void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
>>>>> +		TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map2));
>>>>> +		break;
>>>>
>>>> Why is this necessary if you fix up the mapping in the test?
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is also used within the uc_skey test to make sure the remap does
>>> work after the unmap.
>>
>> Maybe I'm blind because I'm still recovering but where exactly?
> 
> It is literally used in the last line of the test case. Calling uc_handle_exit()
> again re-maps previously unmapped memory.
> 
> I can try to make that a little bit more obvious.
> 
> +	/* unmap and run loop again */
> +	TH_LOG("ucas unmap %p %p 0x%llx",
> +	       (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
> +	rc = ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP, &map2);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
> +		TH_LOG("ucas map result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
> +	ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> +	ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));  // <--- HERE
> +}
> 
> 
Seems like I'm blind then :)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
index 030c59010fe1..41306bb52f29 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
@@ -16,7 +16,11 @@ 
 #include <linux/capability.h>
 #include <linux/sizes.h>
 
+#define PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION 0x10
+
 #define VM_MEM_SIZE (4 * SZ_1M)
+#define VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE (2 * SZ_1M)
+#define VM_MEM_MAX_M ((VM_MEM_SIZE + VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE) / SZ_1M)
 
 /* so directly declare capget to check caps without libcap */
 int capget(cap_user_header_t header, cap_user_data_t data);
@@ -58,6 +62,23 @@  asm("test_gprs_asm:\n"
 	"	j	0b\n"
 );
 
+/* Test program manipulating memory */
+extern char test_mem_asm[];
+asm("test_mem_asm:\n"
+	"xgr	%r0, %r0\n"
+
+	"0:\n"
+	"	ahi	%r0,1\n"
+	"	st	%r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
+
+	"	xgr	%r1, %r1\n"
+	"	l	%r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
+	"	ahi	%r0,1\n"
+	"	diag	0,0,0x44\n"
+
+	"	j	0b\n"
+);
+
 FIXTURE(uc_kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block;
@@ -67,6 +88,7 @@  FIXTURE(uc_kvm)
 	uintptr_t base_hva;
 	uintptr_t code_hva;
 	int kvm_run_size;
+	vm_paddr_t pgd;
 	void *vm_mem;
 	int vcpu_fd;
 	int kvm_fd;
@@ -116,7 +138,7 @@  FIXTURE_SETUP(uc_kvm)
 	self->base_gpa = 0;
 	self->code_gpa = self->base_gpa + (3 * SZ_1M);
 
-	self->vm_mem = aligned_alloc(SZ_1M, VM_MEM_SIZE);
+	self->vm_mem = aligned_alloc(SZ_1M, VM_MEM_MAX_M * SZ_1M);
 	ASSERT_NE(NULL, self->vm_mem) TH_LOG("malloc failed %u", errno);
 	self->base_hva = (uintptr_t)self->vm_mem;
 	self->code_hva = self->base_hva - self->base_gpa + self->code_gpa;
@@ -222,6 +244,36 @@  TEST(uc_cap_hpage)
 	close(kvm_fd);
 }
 
+/* calculate host virtual addr from guest physical addr */
+static void *gpa2hva(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self, u64 gpa)
+{
+	return (void *)(self->base_hva - self->base_gpa + gpa);
+}
+
+static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
+{
+	struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
+	switch (run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code) {
+	case PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
+		pr_info("ucontrol pic segment translation 0x%llx\n",
+			run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
+		/* map / make additional memory available */
+		struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map2 = {
+			.user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code),
+			.vcpu_addr = run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code,
+			.length = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
+		};
+		pr_info("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx\n",
+			(void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
+		TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map2));
+		break;
+	default:
+		TEST_FAIL("UNEXPECTED PGM CODE %d", run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
+	}
+}
+
 /* verify SIEIC exit
  * * reset stop requests
  * * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
@@ -256,6 +308,12 @@  static bool uc_handle_exit(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
 	struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
 
 	switch (run->exit_reason) {
+	case KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL:
+		/** check program interruption code
+		 * handle page fault --> ucas map
+		 */
+		uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(self);
+		break;
 	case KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC:
 		return uc_handle_sieic(self);
 	default:
@@ -287,6 +345,66 @@  static void uc_assert_diag44(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
 	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0x440000, sie_block->ipb);
 }
 
+TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_map_unmap)
+{
+	struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
+	struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+	int rc;
+
+	/* copy test_mem_asm to code_hva / code_gpa */
+	TH_LOG("copy code %p to vm mapped memory %p / %p",
+	       &test_mem_asm, (void *)self->code_hva, (void *)self->code_gpa);
+	memcpy((void *)self->code_hva, &test_mem_asm, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+	/* DAT disabled + 64 bit mode */
+	run->psw_mask = 0x0000000180000000ULL;
+	run->psw_addr = self->code_gpa;
+
+	/* set register content for test_mem_asm to access not mapped memory*/
+	sync_regs->gprs[1] = 0x55;
+	sync_regs->gprs[5] = self->base_gpa;
+	sync_regs->gprs[6] = VM_MEM_SIZE;
+	run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+
+	/* run and expect to fail witch ucontrol pic segment translation */
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+	ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION, run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
+	ASSERT_EQ(self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
+	/* map / make additional memory available */
+	struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map2 = {
+		.user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE),
+		.vcpu_addr = self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE,
+		.length = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
+	};
+	TH_LOG("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx",
+	       (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
+	rc = ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
+		TH_LOG("ucas map result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+	uc_assert_diag44(self);
+
+	/* assert registers and memory are in expected state */
+	ASSERT_EQ(2, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+	ASSERT_EQ(0x55, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+	ASSERT_EQ(0x55, *(u32 *)gpa2hva(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE));
+
+	/* unmap and run loop again */
+	TH_LOG("ucas unmap %p %p 0x%llx",
+	       (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
+	rc = ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP, &map2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
+		TH_LOG("ucas map result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+	ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+	ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
+	ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));
+}
+
 TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_gprs)
 {
 	struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;