diff mbox series

[v1,2/2] dw_mmc-bluefield: add hw_reset() support

Message ID 2c459196c6867e325f9386ec0559efea464cfdd6.1718213918.git.limings@nvidia.com
State New
Headers show
Series eMMC RST_N support on BlueField-2 SoC | expand

Commit Message

Liming Sun June 12, 2024, 10:52 p.m. UTC
The eMMC RST_N register is implemented as secure register on
BlueField SoC and controlled by ATF. This commit sends SMC call
to ATF for the eMMC HW reset.

Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ulf Hansson June 20, 2024, 2:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 00:53, Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> The eMMC RST_N register is implemented as secure register on
> BlueField SoC and controlled by ATF. This commit sends SMC call
> to ATF for the eMMC HW reset.

Just to make sure I get this correctly. Asserting the eMMC reset line
is managed through a secure register? Or is this about resetting the
eMMC controller?

No matter what, it looks to me that it should be implemented as a
reset provider.

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
> index 4747e5698f48..24e0b604b405 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>   * Copyright (C) 2018 Mellanox Technologies.
>   */
>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
> @@ -20,6 +21,9 @@
>  #define BLUEFIELD_UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE   2
>  #define BLUEFIELD_UHS_REG_EXT_DRIVE    4
>
> +/* SMC call for RST_N */
> +#define BLUEFIELD_SMC_SET_EMMC_RST_N   0x82000007
> +
>  static void dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>  {
>         u32 reg;
> @@ -34,8 +38,20 @@ static void dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>         mci_writel(host, UHS_REG_EXT, reg);
>  }
>
> +static void dw_mci_bluefield_hw_reset(struct dw_mci *host)
> +{
> +               struct arm_smccc_res res = { 0 };
> +
> +               arm_smccc_smc(BLUEFIELD_SMC_SET_EMMC_RST_N, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> +                             &res);
> +
> +               if (res.a0)
> +                       pr_err("RST_N failed.\n");
> +}
> +
>  static const struct dw_mci_drv_data bluefield_drv_data = {
> -       .set_ios                = dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios
> +       .set_ios                = dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios,
> +       .hw_reset               = dw_mci_bluefield_hw_reset
>  };
>
>  static const struct of_device_id dw_mci_bluefield_match[] = {
> --
> 2.30.1
>
Liming Sun June 25, 2024, 7:13 p.m. UTC | #2
Thanks, Uffe. Please see some comments/questions below.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 10:22 AM
> To: Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>; David Thompson
> <davthompson@nvidia.com>; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] dw_mmc-bluefield: add hw_reset() support
> 
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 00:53, Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > The eMMC RST_N register is implemented as secure register on
> > BlueField SoC and controlled by ATF. This commit sends SMC call
> > to ATF for the eMMC HW reset.
> 
> Just to make sure I get this correctly. Asserting the eMMC reset line
> is managed through a secure register? Or is this about resetting the
> eMMC controller?

Yes, asserting the eMMC reset line (RST_N) is managed through a secure register.
It's the same register but implemented as secure and can only be written in ATF.

> 
> No matter what, it looks to me that it should be implemented as a
> reset provider.

Do you mean that ' hw_reset()' should implement the whole function instead of just the toggling the RST_N?

> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe
> 
> >
> > Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
> > index 4747e5698f48..24e0b604b405 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >   * Copyright (C) 2018 Mellanox Technologies.
> >   */
> >
> > +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> >  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> >  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> >  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
> > @@ -20,6 +21,9 @@
> >  #define BLUEFIELD_UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE   2
> >  #define BLUEFIELD_UHS_REG_EXT_DRIVE    4
> >
> > +/* SMC call for RST_N */
> > +#define BLUEFIELD_SMC_SET_EMMC_RST_N   0x82000007
> > +
> >  static void dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios
> *ios)
> >  {
> >         u32 reg;
> > @@ -34,8 +38,20 @@ static void dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios(struct dw_mci
> *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> >         mci_writel(host, UHS_REG_EXT, reg);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void dw_mci_bluefield_hw_reset(struct dw_mci *host)
> > +{
> > +               struct arm_smccc_res res = { 0 };
> > +
> > +               arm_smccc_smc(BLUEFIELD_SMC_SET_EMMC_RST_N, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> 0, 0,
> > +                             &res);
> > +
> > +               if (res.a0)
> > +                       pr_err("RST_N failed.\n");
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct dw_mci_drv_data bluefield_drv_data = {
> > -       .set_ios                = dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios
> > +       .set_ios                = dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios,
> > +       .hw_reset               = dw_mci_bluefield_hw_reset
> >  };
> >
> >  static const struct of_device_id dw_mci_bluefield_match[] = {
> > --
> > 2.30.1
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
index 4747e5698f48..24e0b604b405 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-bluefield.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ 
  * Copyright (C) 2018 Mellanox Technologies.
  */
 
+#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
 #include <linux/bitfield.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
@@ -20,6 +21,9 @@ 
 #define BLUEFIELD_UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE	2
 #define BLUEFIELD_UHS_REG_EXT_DRIVE	4
 
+/* SMC call for RST_N */
+#define BLUEFIELD_SMC_SET_EMMC_RST_N	0x82000007
+
 static void dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
 {
 	u32 reg;
@@ -34,8 +38,20 @@  static void dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
 	mci_writel(host, UHS_REG_EXT, reg);
 }
 
+static void dw_mci_bluefield_hw_reset(struct dw_mci *host)
+{
+		struct arm_smccc_res res = { 0 };
+
+		arm_smccc_smc(BLUEFIELD_SMC_SET_EMMC_RST_N, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+			      &res);
+
+		if (res.a0)
+			pr_err("RST_N failed.\n");
+}
+
 static const struct dw_mci_drv_data bluefield_drv_data = {
-	.set_ios		= dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios
+	.set_ios		= dw_mci_bluefield_set_ios,
+	.hw_reset		= dw_mci_bluefield_hw_reset
 };
 
 static const struct of_device_id dw_mci_bluefield_match[] = {