@@ -244,13 +244,16 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct acpi_device *device)
return 0;
}
-static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check)
+#define ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS BIT(0)
+
+static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p)
{
struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler;
+ uintptr_t flags = (uintptr_t)p;
- acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, check);
+ acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, p);
- if (check) {
+ if (flags & ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS) {
acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
/*
* Skip devices that are still there and take the enabled
@@ -288,7 +291,9 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check)
static void acpi_scan_check_subtree(struct acpi_device *adev)
{
- acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)true);
+ uintptr_t flags = ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS;
+
+ acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)flags);
}
static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -2601,7 +2606,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan);
*/
void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *adev)
{
- acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, NULL);
+ uintptr_t flags = 0;
+
+ acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_bus_trim);
Precursor patch adds the ability to pass a uintptr_t of flags into acpi_scan_check_and detach() so that additional flags can be added to indicate whether to defer portions of the eject flow. The new flag follows in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> --- v6: Based on internal feedback switch to less invasive change to using flags rather than a struct. v5: New patch resulting from rebase. - Internal review suggested we could also do this with flags so I'm looking for feedback on which option people find more readable. --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)