| Message ID | 20240206194201.10054-1-rand.sec96@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | i2c: Remove redundant comparison in npcm_i2c_reg_slave | expand |
Hi On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 22:42:01 +0300, Rand Deeb wrote: > In the npcm_i2c_reg_slave() function, there was a redundant > comparison that checked if 'bus->slave' was null immediately after > assigning it the 'client' value. There were concerns about a > potential null dereference because of `client->adapter`, but > according to Wolfram Sang, "we trusted ourselves here" Therefore, > this comparison is unnecessary. > > [...] Applied to i2c/i2c-host on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git Thank you, Andi Patches applied =============== [1/1] i2c: Remove redundant comparison in npcm_i2c_reg_slave commit: 48acf8292280f257fb0047478153a81471ee7f4d
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c index c1b679737240..bdf35b86e559 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c @@ -1247,9 +1247,6 @@ static int npcm_i2c_reg_slave(struct i2c_client *client) bus->slave = client; - if (!bus->slave) - return -EINVAL; - if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN) return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
In the npcm_i2c_reg_slave() function, there was a redundant comparison that checked if 'bus->slave' was null immediately after assigning it the 'client' value. There were concerns about a potential null dereference because of `client->adapter`, but according to Wolfram Sang, "we trusted ourselves here" Therefore, this comparison is unnecessary. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Signed-off-by: Rand Deeb <rand.sec96@gmail.com> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)