Message ID | 20240123150914.308510-1-afd@ti.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 67d85ee4bc749ee94cdfe9638618a506638d1926 |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/5] power: supply: bq27xxx: Switch to a simpler IDA interface | expand |
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:09:10 -0600, Andrew Davis wrote: > We don't need to specify any ranges when allocating IDs so we can switch > to ida_alloc() and ida_free() instead of the ida_simple_ counterparts. > > Applied, thanks! [5/5] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move one time design full read out of poll commit: b282c30dad3e10738a4f03043efaff93d9e8de02 Best regards,
Hi, On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 01:48:07AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:09:10 -0600, Andrew Davis wrote: > > We don't need to specify any ranges when allocating IDs so we can switch > > to ida_alloc() and ida_free() instead of the ida_simple_ counterparts. > > Applied, thanks! > > [5/5] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move one time design full read out of poll > commit: b282c30dad3e10738a4f03043efaff93d9e8de02 FWIW, I queued all 5 patches. -- Sebastian
diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery_i2c.c b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery_i2c.c index 3a1798b0c1a79..86ce13a8ab9dd 100644 --- a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery_i2c.c +++ b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery_i2c.c @@ -13,8 +13,7 @@ #include <linux/power/bq27xxx_battery.h> -static DEFINE_IDR(battery_id); -static DEFINE_MUTEX(battery_mutex); +static DEFINE_IDA(battery_id); static irqreturn_t bq27xxx_battery_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *data) { @@ -145,9 +144,7 @@ static int bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client) int num; /* Get new ID for the new battery device */ - mutex_lock(&battery_mutex); - num = idr_alloc(&battery_id, client, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); - mutex_unlock(&battery_mutex); + num = ida_alloc(&battery_id, GFP_KERNEL); if (num < 0) return num; @@ -198,9 +195,7 @@ static int bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client) ret = -ENOMEM; err_failed: - mutex_lock(&battery_mutex); - idr_remove(&battery_id, num); - mutex_unlock(&battery_mutex); + ida_free(&battery_id, num); return ret; } @@ -212,9 +207,7 @@ static void bq27xxx_battery_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client) free_irq(client->irq, di); bq27xxx_battery_teardown(di); - mutex_lock(&battery_mutex); - idr_remove(&battery_id, di->id); - mutex_unlock(&battery_mutex); + ida_free(&battery_id, di->id); } static const struct i2c_device_id bq27xxx_i2c_id_table[] = {
We don't need to specify any ranges when allocating IDs so we can switch to ida_alloc() and ida_free() instead of the ida_simple_ counterparts. Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> --- drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery_i2c.c | 15 ++++----------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)